Cases

HARTZ, Circuit Judge. The jury awarded a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Milton Whittington, Sr., in a suit under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 623 et seq. (ADEA), against The Nordam Group, Inc. Nordam appeals the district court’s judgment on several grounds: the denial of Nor dam’s motion for judgment as a matter

170 P.3d 546 (2007) 2007 OK CIV APP 94 Christopher STEHM, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. The NORDAM GROUP, INC., Defendant/Appellee. No. 104,000. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1. May 18, 2007. Certiorari Denied September 17, 2007. Charles C. Vaught, Armstrong & Lowe, P.C., Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff/Appellant.</

JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge. One month prior to giving birth, Delisa Atchley took maternity leave from her job *1146 at The Nordam Group and received assurances from Nordam managers she could return to the position at the completion of her leave. When she tried to return as promised, she lear

2009 OK CIV APP 58 NORDAM GROUP, INC., and THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST, Petitioners, v. JOHN E. BATEY and THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION COURT, Respondents. Case Number: 106521 Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division 3 Decided: April 16, 2009 Mandate Issued: June 25, 2009 Bonita Hyatt, LAW OFFICE OF ANN FRIES, Tulsa, Oklahoma, for

345 B.R. 542 (2006) KCH SERVICES, INC., Appellant, v. The NORDAM GROUP, INC., Appellee. Civil No. 1:0602-79. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division. July 14, 2006. *543 David G. Gray, Westall, Gray & Connolly, Asheville, NC, for Appellant. Charles Greenough, Tulsa, OK, Kenneth Todd Lauten

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* MURPHY, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this *960appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted wit

McKAY, Circuit Judge. This equitable tolling case revolves around one crucial legal point — that a completely preempted state law claim becomes the federal claim that Congress enacted to replace the state remedy. Respondent Department of Labor and Intervenor The NORDAM Group, Inc. have not appreciated this key point. They therefore incorrectly argue, and the

The opinion of the court was delivered by CARCHMAN, P.J.AD. This appeal requires us to consider the validity of Ordinance 6PFS-I 050510 (the Ordinance), enacted by defendant City of Newark (the City),1 levying a tax on all car rental transactions within the City’s Second and Third Industrial Zones, the latter of which encompasses parts of Newark Liberty International Airport (the

303 F.Supp.2d 1181 (2004) Heather BLAGG, Plaintiff, v. THE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC., Millennium Technologies Consulting, Inc., Ed Bahl, and Mark Cunningham, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 02-WM-273(CBS). United States District Court, D. Colorado. January 21, 2004. *1182 Erin Webber, Lawrence W. Marquess, Littler Mendelson, Denver, CO, for

ENGEL, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Curtis Schmeling appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant NORDAM, a corporation, in Sehmeling’s suit following the termination of his employment with NORDAM. NORDAM is an air repair station, certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), that contracts with commercial airlines to manufacture and perform mainte

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KAREN HANSEN, on her own behalf No. 16-35684 and on behalf of other similarly situated persons; BETTE JORAM, on D.C. No. her own behalf and on behalf of 2:15-cv-01436- other similarly situated persons, RAJ Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION GROUP HEALTH COOPERATIVE,

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellee Richard Miller sued his former employer Defendant-Appellant Eby Realty Group, LLC, (“Eby”), the successor in interest to Eby Management Company, Inc. (“EMC”), alleging unlawful age discrimination and retaliation under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, and breach of contract.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Plaintiff, Civ. Action No. 20-1809 (EGS) v. ELEVATE CREDIT, INC. Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The District of Columbia (“Plaintiff” or “the District”) filed this consumer protection enforcement action against Elevate Credit, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Elevate”) in the Superior Court of

71 F.3d 1526 MACKLANBURG-DUNCAN CO.; Magnetic Peripherals, Inc.;McDonnell Douglas Corporation; PPG Industries;Weyerhauser Company; WolverineCorporation, Plaintiffs-Appellantsand Cross-Appellees,v.AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY; Continental CasualtyCompany; Interstate Fire and Casualty Company;Stonewall Insurance Company,Defendants-Appellees and Cross-Appellants andHome Indemnity Company, Defendant.

744 F.Supp.2d 1191 (2010) Lori R. SHARP and Rex A. Sharp, Plaintiffs, v. WELLMARK, INC. d/b/a/ Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Iowa, Defendant. Case No. 10-CV-2430-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. October 12, 2010. *1193 Barbara C. Frankland, Rex A. Sharp, Gunderson Sharp & Walke, LLP, Prairie Village, KS,

MEMORANDUM SURRICK, District Judge. Presently before the Court is Defendants Mack Trucks, Inc. and Volvo Group North America, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 20.) For the following reasons, the Motion will be granted. I. BACKGROUND A. The Parties 1. Plaintiff Bruce Andersen Plaintiff Bruce Andersen

264 P.3d 725 (2011) 2011 NMCA 103 David MARTINEZ, Worker-Appellant, v. POJOAQUE GAMING, INC., d/b/a Cities Of Gold Casino, Pojoaque Pueblo, and Food Industries Self-Insurance Fund, Employer/Insurer-Appellees. No. 29,975. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. June 10, 2011. Certiorari Denied, September 16, 2011, No. 33,113. Cer

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 20, 2015 Session HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF TENNESSEE, INC., ET AL. v. BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF TENNESSEE, INC. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 10896II Carol L. McCoy, Chancellor No. M2014-01869-COA-R9-CV – Filed June 9, 2016 Interlocutory appeal in suit brought b

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER RE: ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS ON APPEAL BRUCE S. JENKINS, Senior District Judge. On November 13, 2012, the Clerk of the Court docketed the mandate of the court of appeals in the above-captioned proceeding, affirming this court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants and granting CitiMortgage’s motion for sanctions.1 The court of ap

730 F.Supp.2d 1289 (2010) MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM, Plaintiff, v. AETNA HEALTH, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 10-cv-00371-CMA-MJW. United States District Court, D. Colorado. August 5, 2010. *1292 Mark Douglas Herbert, Law Offices of Mark Douglas Herbert, P.C., Golden, CO, for Plaintiff. Franz Hardy, Gordon & Rees, LL