Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “The Home Depot, Inc. v. Steadfast Insurance Co.”
Home Depot, Inc. v. Steadfast Ins. Co.public domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0005p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ HOME DEPOT, INC.; HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., │
Shambaugh v. Steadfast Inspublic domain
Case: 23-50004 Document: 00517036288 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/18/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-50004 ____________
Kay v. Home Depot, Inc.public domain
623 So.2d 764 (1993) Mary KAY, Appellant, v. HOME DEPOT, INC., et al., Appellees. No. 93-177. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. August 13, 1993. Rehearing Denied September 24, 1993. *765 J. Larry Hanks and James R. Spence, Orlando, for appellant. Gus R. Benitez of Benitez & Butcher,
Rass Corporation v. The Travelers Companies, Inc.public domain
Blake, J. At issue in the present case is whether the defendant insurance companies, The Travelers Companies, Inc., and Travelers Property Casualty Company of America (collectively Travelers), breached their duties to defend, indemnify, and settle in good faith, as to their insured, the plaintiff, Rass Corporation (Rass). The underlying action, arising out of Rass’s decision to cut
Rass Corporation v. The Travelers Companies, Inc.public domain
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us 15-P-358 Appeals Court RASS CORPORATION vs. THE T
Array Techs., Inc. v. Mitchellpublic domain
JAMES A. PARKER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Defendants Colin Mitchell (Mitchell), NEXTracker (NX), Marco Garcia (Garcia), Daniel S. Shugar (Shugar), Scott Graybeal (Graybeal), and Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flextronics) ask the Court to dismiss Counts Three through Ten of Plaintiff Array Technologies, Inc.'s (ATI's) AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. No. 52).1
Mcgowan & Co. v. Boganpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NANCY F. ATLAS, District Judge. This breach of contract and business torts case is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant McGowan & Company, Inc. (“McGowan” or “Plaintiff’) filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“Plaintiffs Motion”) [Doc. #111], to which Defendants/Counter-Claimants Roger F. Bogan (“Bogan”), Swain &
United States v. American Express Co.public domain
DECISION NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.149 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW.152 ' I. BACKGROUND .152 A. Overview of the GPCC Card Industry.152 B. Competition and Pricing in the GPCC Card Industry.156 C. The Non-Discrimination Provisio
in Re Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc.public domain
FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, NO. CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TE
Chamberlain v. Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.public domain
757 F.Supp.2d 683 (2010) John CHAMBERLAIN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC., William P. Brick, Jimmy C. Weaver, Steven J. Janusek and Raymond D. Booth, Defendants. Case No. 08-cv-13451. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 6, 2010. *6
Salazar v. Majestic Realty Co.public domain
Filed 12/4/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE ALEX SALAZAR, B343420 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 24PSCV02047) v. MAJESTIC REALTY CO. et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Co
Torrech-Hernández v. General Electric Co.public domain
519 F.3d 41 (2008) Néstor M. TORRECH-HERNÁNDEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Caribe Ge International Electric Meters Corp., Defendants, Appellees. No. 07-1341. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard November 5, 2007. Decided March 7, 2008. *42 *43<
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
Ruiz v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.public domain
SUTIN, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur with Point II of the majority opinion on strict liability and otherwise I dissent. A. Rule 56(c) which relates to summary judgment should be amended by the Supreme Court. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court has not is
Acme Process Equipment Co. v. United Statespublic domain
Davis, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court:1 Plaintiff’s first experience as a defense contractor was to bid on and win two negotiated Ordnance Corps contracts, both of which soured into litigation.2 In January 1953, Army Ordnance awarded a contract for the manufacture of 75 mm. recoilless rifles. This project was largely subcontracted, leaving
Stanley v. Morganpublic domain
Case: 24-30119 Document: 44-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/28/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED October 28, 2024 No. 24-30119
Barr v. SECpublic domain
Case: 23-60216 Document: 140-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/30/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 23-60216
Arrizon v. TransUnion, LLCpublic domain
2025 IL App (1st) 231911 No. 1-23-1911 First Division March 31, 2025 ____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
Shahrashoob v. Texas A&M Universitypublic domain
Case: 23-20618 Document: 57-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/08/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 23-20618 January 8, 20
Village Green Holding, LLC v. Jonathan Holtzmanpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE VILLAGE GREEN HOLDING, LLC, ) CCI HISTORIC, INC. and VG ECU ) HOLDINGS LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2018-0631-TMR ) JONATHAN HOLTZMAN, ) VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENTIAL ) PROPERTIES, LLC, and VGM ) CLEARING, LLC, formerly known as ) VILLAGE GR