⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “The Direct Response Resource,Inc. v. Hirsch Presentation Systems USA, Inc.”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2006-08-17 · Published · cited 66× · 449 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57759; 2006 WL 2380622
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2017-03-02 · Published · cited 8× · 566 B.R. 815; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29415
MEMORANDUM OPINION Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This case comes before this Court from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas after withdrawal of the reference. In 2011, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the debtor’s (CryptoMetrics) Second Amended Chapter 11 Plan, after which a creditors’ trust and shareholders’ trust were est
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016-02-12 · Published · cited 4× · 816 F.3d 721; 117 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1817; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 2452
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. IMPRESSION PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellant QUALITY CARTRIDGES, INC., JOHN DOES, 1-20, BLUE TRADING LLC, EXPRINT INTERNATIONAL, INC., LD PRODUCTS, INC., PRINTRONIC CORPORATION, TESEN DEVELOPMENT (HONG KONG) CO. LTD., BENIGNO ADEVA AND HIS
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016-02-12 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. IMPRESSION PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellant QUALITY CARTRIDGES, INC., JOHN DOES, 1-20, BLUE TRADING LLC, EXPRINT INTERNATIONAL, INC., LD PRODUCTS, INC., PRINTRONIC CORPORATION, TESEN DEVELOPMENT (HONG KONG) CO. LTD., BENIGNO ADEVA AND HIS
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020-04-01 · Published · cited 161× · 954 F.3d 502
17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN
In re Qualcomm Inc.public domain
District Court, N.D. California · 2016-02-18 · Published · cited 16× · 162 F. Supp. 3d 1029
ORDER DENYING APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY FOR USE IN FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS (Re: Docket No. 1) PAUL S. GREWAL, United States Magistrate Judge A few months back, Applicant Qual-comm Incorporated received an Examiner’s Report from the Korean Fair Trade Commission. The news was not good: the Examiner charged Qualcomm and its licensing of standard-essential patents with vio
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020-02-28 · Published · cited 2× · 951 F.3d 510
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 3, 2020 Decided February 28, 2020 No. 19-5331 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, APPELLEE v. DONALD F. MCGAHN, II, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
District Court, D. Maryland · 2010-09-09 · Published · cited 179× · 269 F.R.D. 497; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93644; 2010 WL 3703696
MEMORANDUM, ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION PAUL W. GRIMM, United States Chief Magistrate Judge. This Memorandum, Order and Recommendation addresses Plaintiffs Motion For Terminating And Other Sanctions Arising Out Of Defendants’ Intentional Destruction Of Evidence And Other Litigation Misconduct (“Pl.’s Mot.”), ECF1 No. 341, which Plaintiff Victor Stanley, Inc. (“VSI”) fi
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-01-08 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-14-00844-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/8/2015 9:31:40 PM CHRISTOPHER PR
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2015-09-29 · Published · cited 1× · 135 F. Supp. 3d 865; 2015 WL 5707000; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130906
OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge. This case is set for a jury trial commencing October 5, 2015. Based on the parties’ extensive brief and oral argument at the final pretrial conference, the court issues the following opinion arid order on defendant Apple’s numerous motions in limine, including several motions to strike expert testimony. OPINION
District Court, D. Nevada · 2013-03-29 · Published · cited 50× · 290 F.R.D. 615; 2013 WL 1333790; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45647
ORDER RE BARD’S ASSERTION OF THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE AS TO FORTY-THREE JOINT SELECTION DOCUMENTS WILLIAM G. COBB, United States Magistrate Judge. In this order, the court will undertake a review of the assertion of the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine by Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc., and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. (collectively, “Bard”) as to certain do
District Court, W.D. New York · 2007-07-09 · Published · cited 3× · 496 F. Supp. 2d 244; 26 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1511; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52773; 2007 WL 2020063
496 F.Supp.2d 244 (2007) David E. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CORNING INCORPORATED, and D'Ann Grell, Defendants. No. 06 CV 6516 CJS. United States District Court, W.D. New York. July 9, 2007. Patrick J. Boyd, Esq., The Boyd Law Group PLLC, New York, for the Plaintiff. Carolyn G. Nussbaum, Esq., Nixon Peabody LLP, Rochester, for the Defendants. DECISI
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011-02-22 · Published · cited 12× · 445 B.R. 143; 2011 WL 597970
445 B.R. 143 (2011) In re LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC., et al., Debtors. In re Lehman Brothers Inc., Debtor. Nos. 08-13555 (JMP), 08-01420 (JMP) SIPA. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. February 22, 2011. *148 Jones Day, Robert W. Gaffey, Esq., Jayant W. Tambe, Esq., William J. Hine, Esq., Tracy V. Schaffer, Esq., New Yo
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2014-12-31 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2009-02-10 · Published · cited 180× · 965 A.2d 763; 2009 Del. Ch. LEXIS 15; 2009 WL 366613
965 A.2d 763 (2009) AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., Consolidated Derivative Litigation. American International Group, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Maurice R. Greenberg and Howard I. Smith, Defendants. C.A. No. 769-VCS. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Submitted: November 12, 2008. Decided: February 10, 2009. *771 St
District Court, S.D. New York · 2004-11-29 · Published · cited 4× · 346 F. Supp. 2d 538
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SPRIZZO, District Judge. THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Three groups of plaintiffs led by Lungi-sile Ntsebeza (“Ntsebeza plaintiffs”),1 Her-mina Digwamaje (“Digwamaje plaintiffs”), and the Khulumani Support Group (“Khu-lumani plaintiffs”) (collectively “plaintiffs”), respectively, filed the above actions in eight federal district cou
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2008-04-14 · Published · cited 0× · 81 Fed. Cl. 514; 2008 U.S. Claims LEXIS 114; 2008 WL 1780109
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 REGARDING PATENT INFRINGEMENT DEFENSES. SUSAN G. BRADEN, Judge. The Government and Defendant-Interve-nors have asserted ten patent infringement defenses including: validity; anticipation; obviousness; the written description requirement; enablement; best mode; definiteness; the “first sale” doctrine; inequitable conduct; and prosecution laches.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-10-22 · Published · cited 0×
N0. 01-14-01004-CV IN THE FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS FIRST COURT OF APPEAL HOUSTON, TEXAS AT HOUSTON 10/22/2015 4:44:20 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE ___________________________ Clerk Kevin CAMPBELL,
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-01-27 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 3923343 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/27/20
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2009-01-16 · Published · cited 35× · 399 B.R. 722; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 54; 2009 WL 116519
399 B.R. 722 (2009) In re MAGNESIUM CORPORATION OF AMERICA, et al., Debtors. Lee E. Buchwald, Chapter 7 Trustee of Magnesium Corporation of America and Renco Metals, Inc., Plaintiff, v. The Renco Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation; K. Sabel Holdings, Inc., an Alabama corporation; KPMG Peat Marwick LLP; Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corporation; Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, LLP; Ira Leon