Cases

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

937 F.Supp. 662 (1996) Gerald Allen THAYER and Dawn Marie Thayer, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civil Nos. 95-40436, 96-40031. Criminal No. 90-50016. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 30, 1996. *663 James L. Edmonds, Grand Blanc, MI, for Petitioners. Mark C. Jones

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-2385 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THOMAS P. THAYER, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

462 F.3d 1169 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Robert Thayer STEVENS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 05-30597. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 28, 2006. Filed September 13, 2006. Mark S. Werner, Federal Defenders of Montana, Billings, MT, for

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * EBEL, Circuit Judge. Counsel for Defendant-Appellant William J. Thayer has submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), requesting permission to withdraw from this case. Counsel contends that no legitimate grounds for appeal exist, and, after reviewing the record, we agree. Counsel’s reque

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAR 03 2000 ________________________

PER CURIAM: Defendants-Appellants, Adelaide Lipton, Armand Storace, Alta Thayer, Dan Lemrond, and Daniel Duliga, were variously charged with and convicted of conspiracy to engage in mail and wire fraud, 1 wire fraud, 2 mail fraud,

Motion of Homeless Empowerment Project for leave to file a brief as amicus curiaegranted. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit for further consideration in light of Reed v. Town of Gilbert,576 U.S. ----,

OPINION PER CURIAM. Enriqueta B. Agcaoili appeals pro se from the order of the District Court dismissing her claims against Richard Thayer for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and entering summary judgment in favor of William Stanley. For the following reasons, we will affirm. I. Agcaoili was injured in 1995, retained Stanley (a lawyer) to file an applic

OPINION PER CURIAM. Enriqueta B. Agcaoili appeals pro se from the order of the District Court dismissing her claims against Richard Thayer for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and entering summary judgment in favor of William Stanley. For the following reasons, we will affirm. I. Agcaoili was injured in 1995, retained Stanley (a lawyer) to file an applic

OPINION OF THE COURT SCIRICA, Circuit Judge. Defendant William Thayer appeals his jury conviction and sentence. William Thayer and his wife and co-defendant Josephine Thayer (who has not appealed her *217 conviction or sentence) were convicted on twenty counts of criminal

384 B.R. 546 (2008) In re Bradley R. THAYER and Judith N. Thayer, Debtors-Defendants. American Residential Mortgage, LP, Plaintiff-Appellee. v. Bradley R. Thayer and Judith N. Thayer, Defendant-Appellants. No. 07-6045. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Eighth Circuit. Submitted: February 13, 2008. Filed: March 31, 2008.

360 B.R. 912 (2007) In re Bradley R. THAYER and Judith N. Thayer, Debtors. American Residential Mortgage, LP, Plaintiff, v. Bradley R. Thayer and Judith N. Thayer, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 04-32735, Adversary No. 04-3338. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota. February 1, 2007. *913 *914

168 F.2d 247 (1948) THAYER v. UNITED STATES. No. 3535. Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. May 10, 1948. *248 W. A. Muir, of Rock Springs (Harold M. Johnson, of Rawlins, on the brief), for appellant. Carl L. Sackett, U. S. Atty., of Sheridan (John C. Pickett, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Cheyenne, on the brief), for appellee

ORDER PER CURIAM: The appellant appealed from a May 1998 Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision that denied his claim for service connection for schizophrenia. On February 15, 2000, the Court dismissed the appeal on the basis that, while his appeal was pending before the Court, a VA regional office had granted the appellant service connection for sc

C. A. 2d Cir. Certio-rari denied.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JACK MITCHELL, § § C.A. No. 174, 2023 Respondent Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Family Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § File No. 22-10-04TN RACHEL and JOSHUA § Petition No. 22-21367 THAYER,

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6045 In re: * * Bradley R. Thayer and Judith N. Thayer, * * Debtors - Defendants * * * Appeal from the United States American Residential Mo