Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “Thakur v. Casey”

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.public domain

District Court, N.D. California · 2017-06-23 · Published · cited 19× · 258 F. Supp. 3d 1013

*1017ORDER RE: WILLFULNESS AND ENHANCED DAMAGES Re: Dkt. Nos, 2186, 2191 LUCY H.' KOH, United States District Judge On May 5, 2014, after a thirteen-day trial and approximately four days of deliberation, a jury in this patent case reached a verdict, which included a finding of willful infringement'of one of Apple’s patents, U.S

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · company profile: Apple Inc. → · find the judge →

Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.public domain

District Court, N.D. California · 2014-09-08 · Published · cited 2× · 67 F. Supp. 3d 1100; 113 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1040; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127972; 2014 WL 4443407

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART APPLE’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW • [PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION] LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge On May 5, 2014, after a thirteen-day trial and approximately four days of deliberation, a jury in this patent case reached a verdict. ECF No. 1884. On May 23, 2014, Apple filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law, amended j

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · company profile: Samsung Electronics Co. → · find the judge →

San Jacinto River Authority v. Vicente Medinapublic domain

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2024-11-26 · Published · cited 0×

Opinion issued November 26, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00013-CV ——————————— SAN JACINTO RIVER AUTHORITY, Appellant V. VICENTE MEDINA; ASHLEY MEDINA; ARIS ANTONIOU; TODD ALLEN; DEAMON BEEMA

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

Adhikari v. Daoud & Partnerspublic domain

District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009-11-03 · Published · cited 8× · 697 F. Supp. 2d 674; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126195; 2009 WL 6067064

697 F.Supp.2d 674 (2009) Ramchandra ADHIKARI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DAOUD & PARTNERS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-cv-1237. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. November 3, 2009. *678 Agnieszka M. Fryszman, Matthew K. Handley, Maureen E. McOwen, Cohen *679

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

Rumsey v. Michigan Department of Correctionspublic domain

District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004-05-28 · Published · cited 2× · 327 F. Supp. 2d 767; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14684; 2004 WL 1682906

327 F.Supp.2d 767 (2004) Charles RUMSEY, Jr., Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS[1], Jonatha Maystead and Kathy Honton, Defendants. Civil Action No. 03-CV-72221-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. May 28, 2004. *768 *769 Charles Rumsey,

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

Gerhardt v. Marespublic domain

District Court, D. New Mexico · 2016-01-20 · Published · cited 3× · 179 F. Supp. 3d 1006; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26552; 2016 WL 808039

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendant Roscoe Woods’ Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint, filed October 16, 2015 (Doc. 29)(“Woods Motion”); (ii) the Racing Commission Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, filed October 28, 2015 (Doc. 31)(“Commission Motion”); and (iii) the Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply to D

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →