Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HON. KEITH P. ELLISON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ' This is a trademark infringement case between two companies that deliver, service and remove on-site portable toilets, dumpster units, and restroom trailers. Pending before the Court are both parties’ motions for summary judgment, as well as the Defendant’s motion to strike. (Doc. Nos. 29, 30 and 43.

ACCEPTED 15-25-00142-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS CAUSE NO. 15-25-00142-CV 9/29/2025 12:00 AM

886 A.2d 1 (2005) AMERICAN LEGACY FOUNDATION, a Delaware non-profit corporation, Plaintiff, v. LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. C.A. No. 19406. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County. Submitted: May 20, 2005. Decided: August 22, 2005. *6 David C. McBride, Esquire, Martin S.

NUMBER 13-06-00038-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG CITY OF ALTON, CARTER & BURGESS, INC., TURNER, COLLIE & BRADEN, INC., AND CRIS EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., Appellants, v. SHARYLAND WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION, Appellee. On appeal from th

NUMBER 13-06-00038-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI

NUMBER 13-06-00038-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG CITY OF ALTON, CARTER & BURGESS, INC., TURNER, COLLIE & BRADEN, INC., AND CRIS EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., Appellants, v. SHARYLAND WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION, Appelle

NUMBER 13-06-00038-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI

The Coastal Club, Inc., Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, RespondentCoastal Club, Inc. v. CommissionerDocket No. 94770United States Tax Court

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

KETCHUM, Justice: The petitioner, Donald Cottle (“Cottle”), appeals from the order of the Circuit Court of Webster County denying him relief under Rule 60(b) of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure from the circuit court’s July 9, 2014, order entered in favor of the respondent, Mary Davis (“Davis”). Cottle is the owner of a parcel within a larger tract of

277 S.W.3d 132 (2009) CITY OF ALTON, Carter & Burgess, Inc., Turner, Collie & Braden, Inc., and Cris Equipment Company, Inc., Appellants, v. SHARYLAND WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION, Appellee. No. 13-06-00038-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. February 5, 2009. *138 Christopher A. Funk, Walker & Twenhaf

STOWERS, Chief Justice. I. INTRODUCTION A nuisance is "a substantial and unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of real property." 1 The Right to Farm Act provides that an agricultural facility or an agricultural operation at an agricultural facility used for commercial pu

[J-20-2025] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, McCAFFERY, JJ. PUNXSUTAWNEY HUNTING CLUB, INC., : No. 23 WAP 2023 AND PITCH PINE HUNTING CLUB, INC., : : Appeal from The Order of the Appellants : Commonwealth Court entere

2013 VT 9 State v. Vuley (2011-087) 2013 VT 9 [Filed Feb-08-2013] NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of De

655 F.3d 915 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guillermo AGUILA-MONTES DE OCA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 05-50170. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 25, 2010. Filed August 11, 2011. *916 Steven F. Hubachek and Vincent J. Brunkow, Federal Defenders of Sa

243 P.3d 289 (2010) STATE of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lloyd PRATT, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 27897, 27898, 27899. Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai`i. November 18, 2010. *290 Daniel G. Hempey (Elif Z. Yarnall with him on the brief), for Defendant-Appellant. Tracy Murakami, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney (Craig A.

Express Scripts, Inc., et al. v. Anne Arundel County, Maryland, Misc. No. 1, September Term, 2025, Opinion by Booth, J. CERTIFIED QUESTION—MARYLAND COMMON LAW OF PUBLIC NUISANCE Pursuant to a certification order from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, the Supreme Court of Maryland (“Supreme Court”) was requested to answer the following questions: 1. Under Maryland’s common law, can the licensed dispensing of, or

585 F.3d 1247 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Roland HINKSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 05-30303. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 16, 2008. Filed November 5, 2009. *1250 Dennis P. Riordan and Donald M. Horgan, San Francisco, CA, and Curtis

Volume 1 of 2 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 05-30303 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. CR-04-00127-RCT DAVID ROLAND HINKSON, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 05-50170 v.  D.C. No. CR-04-02175-RTB GUILLERMO AGUILA-MONTES DE OCA, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the U