Cases

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0224p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ OHIO TELECOM ASSOCIATION (24-3133); TEXAS │ ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS (24-3206); CTI

Case: 24-60219 Document: 105-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/19/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED May 19, 2025 No. 24-60219 ______

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 2 Pages 656–747 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED July 24, 2024 No. 22-60008 Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Cle

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WIDE VOICE, LLC, No. 21-71375 Petitioner, FCC No. 20-362 v. OPINION FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents, AT&T CORP.; AT&T SERVICES, INC.; MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, LLC, Respondents-Intervenors. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Fede

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 1, 2019 Decided October 1, 2019 No. 18-1051 MOZILLA CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 18-

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES; No. 20-71765 LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES; CITY OF GLENDORA, FCC No. CALIFORNIA; CITY OF RANCHO 19-250 PALOS VERDES; CITY OF TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA, OPINION Petitioners, CITY OF COCONUT CREEK, FLORIDA; CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS, CALIFORNIA; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS OFFICERS AND ADVISORS; TOWN OF BRECKE

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 1, 2019 Decided October 1, 2019 No. 18-1051 MOZILLA CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 18-

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 6, 2017 Decided June 13, 2017 Amended August 4, 2017 No. 15-1461 GLOBAL TEL*LINK, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS CENTURYLINK PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL.,

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _________________ Nos. 17-1107, 17-1109, 17-1110, 17-1111 _________________ PROMETHEUS RADIO PROJECT *National Association of Broadcasters **Cox Media Group LLC, Intervenors v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMIS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________ No. 96-60502 _______________ CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Petitioner, VERSUS FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * _______________

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 9, 2013 Decided January 14, 2014 No. 11-1355 VERIZON, APPELLANT v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, APPELLEE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE & TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLIANCE, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1179 ___________________________ Minnesota Telecom Alliance lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Federal Communications Commission; United States of America

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 9, 2013 Decided January 14, 2014 Reissued January 15, 2014 No. 11-1355 VERIZON, APPELLANT v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, APPELLEE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE & TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLIANCE, ET AL.,

USCA11 Case: 23-11270 Document: 68-1 Date Filed: 08/29/2025 Page: 1 of 55 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-11270 ____________________ ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ,

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit May 23, 2014 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court

Case: 10-51113 Document: 00511724657 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 13, 2012 No. 10-51113

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUL 31, 2006 No. 05-11682 THOMAS K. KAHN ________________________ CLERK

Opinion of the Court by Kruger, J. *574 *880 Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 ( section 425.16 ), commonly known as the anti-SLAPP statute, allows defendants to request early judicial scr

ORDER AND OPINION DENYING STAY AND GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN; District Judge. Plaintiff Araceli King.brings.this action against Defendant Time Warner Cable for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C, § 227 et seq. King alleges that Time Warner, placed 163 automated or .prerecorded calls to her cellular phone. without her cons