Cases

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0224p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ OHIO TELECOM ASSOCIATION (24-3133); TEXAS │ ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS (24-3206); CTI

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 2 Pages 656–747 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED July 24, 2024 No. 22-60008 Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Cle

SRINIVASAN, Circuit Judge, joined by TATEL, Circuit Judge, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc: In this case, a panel of our court upheld the FCC’s 2015 Open Internet Order, commonly known as the net neutrality rule. The parties who unsuccessfully challenged the Order before the panel have now filed petitions seeking review by the full court sitting en banc. The court today denies en banc review. E

USCA11 Case: 24-10277 Document: 60-1 Date Filed: 01/24/2025 Page: 1 of 26 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-10277 ____________________ INSURANCE MARKETING COALITION LIMITED,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WIDE VOICE, LLC, No. 21-71375 Petitioner, FCC No. 20-362 v. OPINION FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents, AT&T CORP.; AT&T SERVICES, INC.; MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, LLC, Respondents-Intervenors. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Fede

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 1, 2021 Decided May 27, 2022 No. 20-1471 INTELIQUENT, INC., PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Communications Commission

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 1, 2019 Decided October 1, 2019 No. 18-1051 MOZILLA CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 18-

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 1, 2019 Decided October 1, 2019 No. 18-1051 MOZILLA CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 18-

Case: 19-60896 Document: 00515905664 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 18, 2021

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 6, 2017 Decided June 13, 2017 Amended August 4, 2017 No. 15-1461 GLOBAL TEL*LINK, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS CENTURYLINK PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL.,

PUBLIC COPY - SEALED INFORMATION DELETED Antb Qlourt rif ppt1 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 27, 2019 Decided December 10, 2019 No. 18-1271 FLAT WIRELEss, LLC, PETITIoNER V. FEDERAL CoMN[uI.ITcATIoNs CoMMIssIoN AN]) UNITED STATES OF AIvIERICA, RES

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _________________ Nos. 17-1107, 17-1109, 17-1110, 17-1111 _________________ PROMETHEUS RADIO PROJECT *National Association of Broadcasters **Cox Media Group LLC, Intervenors v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMIS

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 9, 2013 Decided January 14, 2014 No. 11-1355 VERIZON, APPELLANT v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, APPELLEE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE & TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLIANCE, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1179 ___________________________ Minnesota Telecom Alliance lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Federal Communications Commission; United States of America

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 9, 2013 Decided January 14, 2014 Reissued January 15, 2014 No. 11-1355 VERIZON, APPELLANT v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, APPELLEE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE & TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLIANCE, ET AL.,

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1639 ___________________________ North Dakota Retail Association; North Dakota Petroleum Marketers Association; Corner Post, Inc. Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Board of

Case: 24-60013 Document: 151-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/27/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED January 27, 2025

Case: 24-10245 Document: 96-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/23/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED May

ACCEPTED 15-24-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/21/2025 4:06 PM No. 15-24-00120-C