Cases

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-1208 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Per Curiam: A jury convicted Terry Ray Hayes of first-degree premeditated murder, and the sentencing judge imposed the enhanced sentence of life without the possibility of parole for 50 years (hard 50 sentence). On direct appeal, this court affirmed Hayes' murder conviction but vacated the hard 50 sentence because Kansas' statutory scheme for imposing the enhanced sentence violated Haye

OPINION Brian Quinn, Chief Justice Terry Len Hayes appeals his conviction for felony assault. Through a single issue, he contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his Amended Motion for New Trial. That is, he believed himself, entitled .to a new trial because the court bailiff informed jurors, during trial, that the parties were discussing a plea bargain. Because a plea bargain necessari

SUSAN M. CHEHARDY, Chief Judge. I ¡.On appeal, defendant challenges his guilty pleas. For the following reasons, we affirm defendant’s convictions but remand for re-sentencing and correction of the commitment. Facts and Procedural History In this case, the convictions resulted from guilty pleas so the facts surrounding the offenses were gleaned from the bill of informati

ORDER PER CURIAM. From an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying compensation, the appellant appealed asserting application of the mutual benefit, special errand, and dual purpose rules. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

JUDE G. GRAVOIS, Judge. JgNTRODUCTION In this, his second appeal, defendant/appellant, Calvin Hayes, seeks review of his sentences, claiming that they were illegally rendered. For the following reasons, we affirm defendant’s sentences and remand the matter for correction of the commitment. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On March 23, 2012, the Jefferson Par

In re Terry D. Hayes Logging Cont.; American Interstate Ins. Co.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Office of Workers’ Compensation, Dist. # 2, No. 95-07383; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA98-0193. Denied. MARCUS, TRAYLOR, and KNOLL, JJ., would grant the writ. VICTORY, J., not on panel.

liTHIBODEAUX, Judge. Terry Hayes Logging and its insurer, American Interstate Insurance Company (AIIC), instituted an action to terminate the workers’ compensation benefits-of its injured employee, Larry Baxley. Baxley was accused of violating two anti-fraud provisions of the state’s workers’ compensation statutes, La.R.S. 23:1208 and 23:1208.1, by failing to answer truthfully questions regarding his medical history. The wor

*862The opinion of the court was delivered by Rosen, J.: Terry Ray Hayes appeals from his convictions and sentences for premeditated first-degree murder and aggravated assault. He challenges the denial of his request for a voluntaiy manslaughter instruction and the district court’s imposition of a hard 50 life sentence. Hayes was marri

JOSEPHINE LINKER HART, Justice. 11 This is an appeal from the denial of postconviction relief under Rule 37 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure. By per curiam order handed down November 7, 2013, we remanded this case to settle the record because there were gaps and inconsistencies in the material we had before us that prevented us from determining w

FOURTH DIVISION BARNES, P. J., ANDREWS and BOGGS, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. (Court of Appeals Rule 4 (b) and Rule 37 (b), February 21, 2008) http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/

STATE OF LOUISIANA * NO. 2017-KA-0789 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL CARDELL A. HAYES * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL D

RITA W. GRUBER, Judge. |,Terry Edward Hayes brings this appeal from four felony convictions in his trial by jury in the Washington County Circuit Court. He contends that the circuit court 1) should have granted a hearing on his motion for a new trial, and 2) erred in denying a continuance for his new counsel to prepare for the sentencing hearing. The State contends that no reversible error resulted fr

*449MEMORANDUM Stengel, District Judge This case is part of a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) involving claims of liver damage from the use of Tylenol at or just above the recommended dosage.1 The first “bellwether” case is scheduled for trial.2 *450

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 496 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 497 OPINION This appeal presents issues arising from the expert report requiremen

288 S.W.3d 334 (2009) Lee HAYES v. GIBSON COUNTY, Tennessee. No. W2007-01849-SC-R11-CV. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Jackson. April 8, 2009 Session. July 2, 2009. *335 J. Mark Johnson, Trenton, Tennessee, for the appellant, Lee Hayes. Floyd S. Flippin and Terri Smith Crider, Humboldt, Tennessee, for the

518 F.3d 989 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Terry Jean HAYES, also known as Terry Jean Johnson, Appellant. No. 07-1208. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: November 13, 2007. Filed: March 14, 2008. *990 *991 Adam Douglas Fein, argued, Mich

OPINION ¶ 1 This is Matthew R. Hayes' (Student) appeal from the trial court's May 17, 1999, order requiring Student not to harass, threaten, or abuse Appellee Jennifer Spielmann (Teacher), after Student allegedly left a threatening message on Teacher's voice mail system. Student contends Teacher lacked standing to seek a restraining order and failed to provide sufficient evidence to support the order, and the trial judge's decision to issue a c