⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Terry Wilkes”

Wilkes v. Terrypublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2011-11-07 · Published · cited 3× · 717 S.E.2d 644; 290 Ga. 54; 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3426; 2011 Ga. LEXIS 867
717 S.E.2d 644 (2011) WILKES v. TERRY. No. S11A1410. Supreme Court of Georgia. November 7, 2011. *645 Sarah Gerwig-Moore, Andrew Mahler, Danielle L. Brewer, Joseph Scott Key, McDonough, for appellant. Samuel S. Olens, Atty. Gen., Paula K. Smith, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jason C. Fisher, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019-04-12 · Published · cited 0× · 121 N.E.3d 1095
Bailey, Judge. Case Summary [1] Paul Michael Wilkes ("Wilkes") appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Celadon Trucking Services, Inc., Celadon Logistics Services, Inc. and Celadon Group, Inc. (collectively, "Celadon") and Cummins, Inc., Cummins Corporation, and Cummins John Doe Entities (collectively, "Cummins") (at times, collectively referred to as "Def
Montana Supreme Court · 2001-07-13 · Published · cited 12× · 2001 MT 118; 27 P.3d 433; 305 Mont. 335; 2001 Mont. LEXIS 183
27 P.3d 433 (2001) 2001 MT 118 Mary WILKES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. The ESTATE OF Lawrence R. WILKES, Defendant, Respondent and Cross-Appellant. No. 00-515. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs March 1, 2001. Decided July 13, 2001. *434 For Appellant: Scott B. Spencer, Attorne
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993-09-23 · Published · cited 13× · 631 A.2d 880; 1993 D.C. App. LEXIS 233; 1993 WL 375307
FARRELL, Associate Judge, dissenting: The government’s position in this case, broadly read, is that when the prosecution has proven all of the elements of the charge beyond a reasonable doubt and the defendant then attempts to disprove his sanity at the time of the offense through psychiatric witnesses, the exclusionary rule should not bar the prosecutor from testing the foundation of the witnesses’ conclusions
Williams v. Terrypublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990-10-09 · Published · cited 4× · 398 S.E.2d 239; 197 Ga. App. 209; 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 1260
197 Ga. App. 209 (1990) 398 S.E.2d 239 WILLIAMS v. TERRY et al. A90A1861. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided October 9, 1990. Wilkes, Johnson & Smith, Ken W. Smith, for appellant. Terry A. Dillard, Bryant H. Bower, Jr., for appellees. DEEN, Presiding Judge. Lurner O. Williams brought a medical malpract
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992-11-13 · Published · cited 11× · 616 A.2d 614; 532 Pa. 494; 1992 Pa. LEXIS 507
532 Pa. 494 (1992) 616 A.2d 614 Richard W. HANKEE and Jamie Hankee, his wife, Appellants, v. WILKES-BARRE/SCRANTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, Appellee, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Intervenor/Appellee. Frederick G. SCHRAMM and Betty Jane Schramm, his wife, v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY SANITATION AUTHORITY, Appellee, Carson-Pirie-Scott and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Intervenors-Appellees. APPEAL OF F
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016-07-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 22, 2016 Session CENTRAL BANK v. JEFF WILKES, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hardin County No. CH179 Donald E. Parish, Judge ___________________________________ No. W2015-02079-COA-R3-CV – Filed July 21, 2016 _____________________________
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016-07-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 22, 2016 Session CENTRAL BANK v. JEFF WILKES, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hardin County No. CH179 Donald E. Parish, Judge ___________________________________ No. W2015-02399-COA-R3-CV – Filed July 21, 2016 ___________________
Neal v. Wilkespublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court · 2004-07-20 · Published · cited 181× · 685 N.W.2d 648; 470 Mich. 661
685 N.W.2d 648 (2004) 470 Mich. 661 Julie NEAL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry WILKES, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 122498, Calendar No. 7. Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued March 9, 2004. Decided July 20, 2004. *649 Traci M. Kornak P.C. (by Traci M. Kornak), Grand Rapids, for the plainti
State v. Wilkespublic domain
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2008-10-10 · Published · cited 60× · 756 N.W.2d 838; 2008 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 139; 2008 WL 4531547
756 N.W.2d 838 (2008) STATE of Iowa, Appellant, v. Richard S. WILKES, Appellee. No. 07-0824. Supreme Court of Iowa. October 10, 2008. *840 Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Richard J. Bennett, Assistant Attorney General, and Daniel Feistner, County Attorney, for appellant. Leslie G. Peters, Avoca, for appellee. AP
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014-04-29 · Published · cited 0× · 7 N.E.3d 402; 2014 WL 1688039; 2014 Ind. App. LEXIS 188
OPINION MAY, Judge. Jeremiah D. Wilkes appeals his two convictions of Class B felony sexual misconduct with a minor. 1 He alleges the court’s admission of hearsay and vouching testimony denied him his right to a fair trial. We affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY <
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988-03-30 · Published · cited 0× · 845 F.2d 1013; 1988 WL 37749
845 F.2d 1013 Moore (Tyrone)v.Paul (Terry), Sincavage (Allen), Mr. Ottersman, Wilkes-BarrePolice Dept., Commissioner of All County Prisons NO. 87-5602 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. MAR 30, 1988 Appeal From: M.D.Pa., Caldwell, J.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012-11-29 · Published · cited 652× · 700 F.3d 675; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 24592; 2012 WL 5954632
OPINION OF THE COURT HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal requires us to decide whether the District Court erred when it denied a police officer’s motion to dismiss a civil rights action. I On the evening of September 28, 2009, fifteen-year-old Nicole James sent a text message to a friend stating that she plan
Wilkes v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004-09-10 · Published · cited 12× · 604 S.E.2d 601; 269 Ga. App. 532; 2004 Ga. App. LEXIS 1215
604 S.E.2d 601 (2004) 269 Ga. App. 532 WILKES v. The STATE. No. A04A1132. Court of Appeals of Georgia. September 10, 2004. *603 Ellis R. Garnett, Augusta, for appellant. Daniel J. Craig, District Attorney, Charles R. Sheppard, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. SMITH, Chief Judge.
Miller v. Wilkespublic domain
Alaska Supreme Court · 1972-04-28 · Published · cited 10× · 496 P.2d 176; 1972 Alas. LEXIS 264
496 P.2d 176 (1972) Terry J. MILLER et al., Appellants, v. Fred M. WILKES, Appellee. No. 1559. Supreme Court of Alaska. April 28, 1972. James H. Lack, Anchorage, for appellants. Warren W. Matthews, Jr., Matthews, Dunn & Baily, Anchorage, for appellee. Before BONEY, C.J., and RABINOWITZ, CONNOR and ERWIN, JJ. OPINION BONEY, C
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016-07-08 · Published · cited 141× · 828 F.3d 763; 2015 WL 11120665
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Chief District Judge CHRISTENSEN ORDER The opinion filed August 25, 2015 is hereby amended as follows: The last paragraph on page 41 through the last paragraph on page 43 of the slip opinion should be removed and replaced with the following: The main theory of Kachikian’s defense was that Kachikian lacked the required criminal intent because he bel
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2017-08-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 16-1720 Filed August 2, 2017 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. TERRY LEE COFFMAN, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Story County, James B. Malloy, District Associate Judge. A defendant appeals his conviction for operating while intoxicated, claiming
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2018-06-22 · Published · cited 59× · 914 N.W.2d 240
MANSFIELD, Justice. This case requires us to decide whether an officer was justified in pulling behind a vehicle and activating his emergency lights when the vehicle was stopped by the side of a highway after 1:00 a.m. with its brake lights engaged. We conclude the officer's actions were justified under the "community caretaking function" exception to the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment and article I, section 8 of the Io
Wilkes v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001-06-25 · Published · cited 104× · 364 Md. 554; 774 A.2d 420; 2001 Md. LEXIS 397
CATHELL, Judge. This case concerns whether police officers’ use of a K-9 inspection for controlled dangerous substances (CDS) during a routine traffic stop improperly extended the traffic stop beyond what is considered reasonable under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Petitioner, Timothy Johnson Wilkes,1 was charged by criminal information filed on October 30, 1996, with poss
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015-08-25 · Published · cited 5× · 801 F.3d 970
OPINION CLIFTON, Circuit Judge: Six defendants appeal their criminal convictions stemming from a widespread criminal enterprise offering illegal private investigation services in Southern California. *981At the center of this criminal enterprise was Pellicano Investigative Agency, known as PIA. Defendant Anthony Pellicano operated PIA, ostensibl