Cases

232 F.Supp.2d 934 (2002) James M. TERRY, by and Through His Mother and Next Friend, Arbunes TERRY, and Arbunes Terry Plaintiffs v. Richard HILL, Deputy Director, Division of Mental Health Services, Arkansas Department of Human Services in his Official Capacity Defendant No. 4:01CV458 SMR. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division. May 6, 2002. Be

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Sep 08 2017, 8:33 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court

318 Ga. 185 FINAL COPY S23A0810. HARPER v. THE STATE. MCMILLIAN, Justice. On August 27, 2003, a jury found Terry Harper, along with his co-defendant Emmanuel Ruiz, guilty of murder and related charges in connection with the shooting deaths of Joe Luhrman, David Carty, and Tracy Glover in 2001.1 On appeal, Harper contends that 1 The crimes were committed on September 26, 2001. Harper and his co- defendant Emmanuel Ruiz were indicted by a Fulton Count

MATHIAS, J. Affirmed. ALTICE, J., Concurs. KIRSCH, J., Dissents with opinion.

Appellate Case: 23-5091 Document: 96-1 Date Filed: 10/03/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH October 3, 2024

THOMAS, Judge. This is the second time these parties have been before this court. See Terry v. Terry (No. 2120113, August 30, 2013), — So.3d — (Ala.Civ.App.2013) (table). The relevant facts relating to the previous appeal are as follows. On March 28, 2011, Michelle Terry, also known as Michelle Vandergrift, filed a complaint for a divorce in the Madison Circuit Court (“the trial

DON E. BURRELL, J. The State appeals the suppression of statements George Owen Harper (“Defendant”) made to a deputy sheriff who stopped Defendant’s vehicle to question him about potential criminal activity. The State claims the suppression (based on the trial court’s conclusion that a Miranda1 violation had occurred) was erroneous because Defendant was not in custody at the time of the qu

191 Ill. App.3d 245 (1989) 547 N.E.2d 574 In re MARRIAGE OF LYNDEN HARPER, Petitioner-Appellant, and TERRY J. HARPER, n/k/a Terry J. Palumbo, Respondent-Appellee. No. 4-89-0326. Illinois Appellate Court — Fourth District. Opinion filed November 9, 1989. Thorpe Facer, of Allen & Korkowski & Associates, of Rantoul, for appellant. L. Keit

HUNSTEIN, Chief Justice. This is an appeal from the denial of injunctive relief sought by appellants, D.C. Tunison, Mary Tunison and Arlene Tunison, to protect their riparian rights to a 20-acre woods pond1 situated on their property and that of adjacent property owner, appellee Terry Harper. This petition was filed after appellee, a farmer who uses the pond to irrigate crops on his property, incre

*89Justice Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court. In Davis v. Michigan Dept. of Treasury, 489 U. S. 803 (1989), we held that a State violates the constitutional doctrine of intergovernmental tax immunity when it taxes retirement benefits paid by the Federal Government but exempts from taxation all retirement benefits paid by the Stat

Appellant, Jane Irene Harper, was arrested on October 12, 1983, for driving under the influence of alcohol, in violation of § 32-5A-191, Code of Alabama 1975. On October 24, 1983, appellant was found guilty in the Municipal Court of Troy, Alabama, and filed notice of appeal to the Circuit Court. A trial by jury was held in the Pike County Circuit Court on March 26, 1984, and appellant was found guilty as charged. It was determined that appella

PER CURIAM. In this adoption case, we hold the execution of a consent to adopt document must strictly comply with section *47263-9-340 of the South Carolina Code (2010). We affirm the family court’s determination that the consent document signed by the birth mother was rendered invalid by (1) the failure of the attorney-witness to be present when the birth mother sign

410 S.E.2d 629 (1991) Henry HARPER, et al., v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION. Lawrence E. LEWY, et al. v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION. Record Nos. 900770, 900792. Supreme Court of Virginia. November 8, 1991. *630 Joseph B. Hyman, Arlington (Lawrence E. Lewy, on briefs), for appellants, in Record No. 900770.

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur

OPINION Appellant, Christopher James Harper, pled guilty in open court to intentionally or knowingly possessing a usable quantity of marijuana in an amount of five pounds or less but more than four ounces and was sentenced to fifteen months confinement pursuant to a plea agreement.2 In his single point of error, Appellant asserts the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress the marijuana se

260 P.3d 596 (2011) 244 Or. App. 10 STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Armond Ramoan HARPER, Defendant-Appellant. 080833771; A141919. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted December 20, 2010. Decided June 29, 2011. Anne Fujita Munsey, Senior Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on

249 Ga. 519 (1982) 292 S.E.2d 389 HARPER v. THE STATE. 38480. Supreme Court of Georgia. Decided June 2, 1982. Rehearing Denied June 22, 1982. G. Terry Jackson, for appellant. Spencer Lawton, Jr., District Attorney, David T. Lock, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Janice G. Hild

401 S.E.2d 868 (1991) Henry HARPER, et al. v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION. Lawrence E. LEWY, et al. v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION. Record Nos. 900770, 900792. Supreme Court of Virginia. March 1, 1991. *869 Michael J. Kator (Stephen A. Bryant, W. Lester Duty, Mary-Leslie Duty, Gregory S. Hooe, Duty and Duty, T

In this case we consider whether a judgment in a bill of review proceeding that sets aside a parentage adjudication, but does not make a new parentage adjudication, is an appealable judgment. We conclude that it is not. Kelly Jo Wood married Terry Kiefer in 1995. The next year, while married to Kiefer, Wood began an affair with Ioannis John Touris. In 1998, Wood became pregnant with Touris's child, and A.K.1 was born later that

[Cite as State v. Harper, 2014-Ohio-347.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 12CA0076-M Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE ISHA S. HARPER