Cases

391 F.Supp.2d 1377 (2005) In re IN RE BEXTRA AND CELEBREX MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION In re Bextra and Celebrex Products Liability Litigation In re Celebrex Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation In re Brextra And Celebrex Marketing Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation. Nos. MDL-1699, MDL-1691, MDL-1693, MDL-1694. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litig

[Cite as State v. Nowlin, 2012-Ohio-4923.] COURT OF APPEALS MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT : JUDGES: STATE OF OHIO : W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : William B. Hoffman, J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Julie A. Edwards, J.

249 F.Supp. 414 (1966) James F. CATE, and Continental Casualty Corporation, a Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. DYNALECTRON CORPORATION, Third-Party Defendant. Civ. A. No. 3229-64. United States District Court S. D. Alabama, S. D. January 25, 1966. *415

These are appeals by Max and Esther Gray, plaintiffs below, from jury verdicts in favor of defendant, Mobile Greyhound Park, Ltd. Mrs. Gray sued for personal injuries sustained when she slipped and fell in the grandstand area of defendant's dog track. Her husband claimed damages for medical expenses and loss of consortium. On March 22, 1976, Max and Esther Gray, along with their son Terry, attended the dog track owned and operated by Mobile Greyhound Park, Ltd. They paid a gene

FILED MARCH 21, 2017 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE ROBERT REPIN,

158 Ill. App.3d 676 (1987) 511 N.E.2d 1255 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GARY FONVILLE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 4-86-0745. Illinois Appellate Court — Fourth District. Opinion filed July 21, 1987. *677 *678 Arthur M. Lerner, of Greaves, Ler

OPINION DONNELLY, Judge. The previous opinion is withdrawn and the following is substituted. Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying revocation of his treatment guardianship and the Health and Environment Department (HED) cross-appeals from the judgment ordering it to pay for petitioner’s expert witness fee. Three issues are raised in peti

773 P.2d 1241 (1989) 108 N.M. 434 In the Matter of William (Willie) SANDERS. William (Willie) SANDERS, Petitioner-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. NEW MEXICO HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, Respondent-appellee and Cross-Appellant. No. 10644. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. April 6, 1989. *1242 Anita

R. JASPER SMITH, District Judge. In this case defendant has filed its motion for summary judgment on the grounds that plaintiff is barred from maintaining this action by reason of plaintiff’s previous election of remedies in case No. 9202, between the same parties in Division No. 2 of this Court. The action was filed May 19, 1956, in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, and was removed here June 7, 1956, as a diversi

707 S.W.2d 694 (1986) Wesley Eugene DAHL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 3-85-080-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. March 26, 1986. Kenneth E. Houp, Jr., Austin, for appellant. Ronald Earle, Dist. Atty., Paul Womack, Asst. Dist. Atty., Austin, for appellee. Before POWERS, EARL W. SMITH and BRADY, JJ.

This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit which was induced by the sustaining of demurrers to the three counts of appellant's complaint as last amended. The suit was for damages for the "wrongful and malicious expulsion" of appellant from membership in Skyline Country Club, Inc., in Mobile. Counts One, Two and Three of the complaint as last amended aver that plaintiff was a member in good standing of defendant Skyline at the time his wife was seriously injured while playing

The opinion of the court was delivered, April 5th 1873, by Read, C. J. This is a writ of error to the Criminal Court of Schuylkill county, sued out under the Act of the 15th February 1870, upon the oath of the defendant, and brings, up the whole record. The constitutionality and jurisdiction of this court have been finally settled in Commonwealth v. Green, 8 P. F. Smith 226, and in

This is a suit for the recovery of statutory penalties for breach of a liquor dealer's bond. P. O. Cox is the principal in the bond and the other defendants are sureties. The petition charges that the defendant Cox breached the bond by permitting W. W. Thompson, a minor, to enter and remain in his saloon on three separate occasions. The jury found these allegations true, and returned a verdict for the plaintiff for $3,000. Judgment was entered accordingly, and the defendants have appealed. Th