Cases

ORDER The memorandum disposition filed January 19, 1995 is withdrawn. With the memorandum disposition withdrawn, the Petition for Rehearing and the Motion to Certify Questions of State Law to the Oregon Supreme Court are moot. OPINION RYMER, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether the City of Portland’s or

ACCEPTED 03-15-00008-CV 5661355 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

Case: 16-17147 Date Filed: 10/08/2019 Page: 1 of 69 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-17147 ________________________ D.C. Docket Nos. 4:08-md-02004-CDL, 4:12-cv-00176-CDL TERESA TAYLOR,

Standridge, J.: Amy Sanchez, individually and as next friend of her son, Austin Sanchez (Plaintiffs), sued Unified School District No. 469 (USD 469); Kerry Brungardt, the Lansing Middle School principal; and two students and their parents seeking damages allegedly resulting from the students' bullying of Austin. Eventually, the only claim that remained was Plaintiffs’ claim of neg

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Doran Bowers appeals the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing with prejudice Bowers’ civil action, and denying Bowers’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend that judgment. We have reviewed the record and find n

217 F.3d 811 (10th Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF - APPELLANT,v.MICHELLE CHERRY; LADONNA GIBBS; TERESA PRICE, ALSO KNOWN AS TERESA BROWN; SONYA PARKER, DEFENDANTS - APPELLEES,ANDJOSHUA PRICE, JR., ALSO KNOWN AS LIL' JUNE, ALSO KNOWN AS JUNE, ALSO KNOWN AS JUNE ANDERSON, DEFENDANT No. 99-7019 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT June 12

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part. I must respectfully dissent from the principal holdings in the majority opinion based on an extension of Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 66 S.Ct. 1180, 90 L.Ed. 1489 (1946), and the suggested application of Fed.R.Evid. 804(b)(6). From them, the majority finds a waiver of the constitutional right to confrontation and the hearsay rule. In my view the

586 F.3d 1369 (2009) Triantafyllos TAFAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, and SmithKline Beecham Corporation (doing business as GlaxoSmithKline), Smithkline Beecham PLC, and Glaxo Group Limited (doing business as GlaxoSmithKline), Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. David J. KAPPOS, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and United States Patent and Trademark Office, Defendants-Appellants

FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE ADULT AND CHILD MENTAL DAVID B. WILSON HEALTH CENTER Indianapolis, Indiana SHERI BRADTKE McNEIL W. BRENT GILL Kopka, Pinkus, Dolin & Eads, P.C. Nunn Law Office Crown Point, Indiana Bloomington, Indiana

THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION AND INCLUDABLE SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentCharles Schwab Corp. v. CommissionerDocket No. 1271-92.United States Tax Court

ORDER VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on Defendants Michelle and Teresa Grasso’s Motion for Partial ■ Summary Judgment -(Doc. #92), filed on June 30, 2015. Plaintiff *1305Olga T. Grasso filed a response in opposition on July 30, 2015. (Doc. # 98). Michelle and Teresa1

MEMORANDUM*** Moubaye Mohamed Mbaye, a native and citizen of Mali, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision denying him relief under Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (“Convention”), as implemented by Pub.L. No. 105-277, § 2242, 112 Stat. 2681, 2681-821, see 8 C.F.R. 208.17 (2003), a

DAVIS, Judge. *11 This appeal presents the issues of whether (1) North Carolina law recognizes a cause of action for tortious interference with an expected inheritance by a potential beneficiary during the lifetime of the testator; and (2) in cases where a living parent has grounds to bring cla

SELYA, Circuit Judge. In this case, the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (the Commissioner) issued a deficiency notice to the State Police Association of Massachusetts (the Association) for income taxes allegedly- due but unpaid. When the Association protested, the Tax Court sided with the Commissioner. See State Police Ass’n of Mass. v. Commissioner,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S DAU-BERT MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY BY DR. GENTILE, PROF. FISKE, PROF. BIELBY, AND DR. HOFFMAN ILLSTON, District Judge. On July 9,1997, the Court heard argument on defendant’s motions to exclude testimony by Dr. Gentile, Professor Fiske, Professor Bielby, and Dr. Hoffman pursuant to Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786,

844 A.2d 29 (2004) Vaughn KOTER, Ralph Vivian, Sally Ann McGuire, Emil Feist, Michele Kane, Christopher Evans, Sister Mary Eleanor Thornton, RSM, Ruth Whalen, Teresa Hustey, George Hammerbacher, Simon Daywood, Samir Maroun, John Thornton and Elwood Rosengrant v. Joseph COSGROVE, John Elias, and Constance Wynn, in their capacity as the Luzerne County Board of Elections and Kevin Jordan as Director of Voter Services for Luzerne County and the City

OPINION BY BENDER, J.: ¶ 1 Michelle Necole Griffith appeals the judgment of sentence imposed following her conviction of Driving Under the Influence of a Controlled Substance. 75 Pa. C.S. § 3802(d)(2). Griffith contends that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress prescription medication seized from the defendant’s car after police transported her to a local hospital for blood testing. Griffith also asserts that the evid

JOHN M. WALKER, Jr., Circuit Judge: Defendants-appellants Rodney Hampton, Wayne Rodriguez, Jerry Williams, Fred Moye, Michelle Thomas, James Piggott, and Christian Key (hereinafter “appellants”) appeal from judgments of conviction entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Thomas P. Griesa, Chief District Judge). The appellants raise numerous claims of error on appeal. In a su

BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) brought an action against Audrain Health Care, Inc., (Au-drain) alleging that Audrain violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a, by refusing to consider transferring David Lunceford to

08/22/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 22, 2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES DOUGLAS BLACK Appeal from the Criminal Court for Greene County No. 12CR149 John F. Dugger, Jr., Judge ___________________________________