⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Teamsters Local 677 Health Services and Insurance Plan v. Friedman”

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992-05-27 · Published · cited 11× · 964 F.2d 1308
OAKES, Chief Judge: In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether internal union disciplinary sanctions should be upheld against Joseph Cimino, Jr., former President and Business Agent of Local 107 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America (“IBT”), AFL-CIO, in Philadelphia. The sanctions were imposed for Cimino’s violation of the IBT Constitution through his knowing assoc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986-04-23 · Published · cited 76× · 787 F.2d 128
787 F.2d 128 54 USLW 2527, 7 Employee Benefits Ca 1273 UNITED RETAIL & WHOLESALE EMPLOYEES TEAMSTERS UNION LOCALNO. 115 PENSION PLAN and Robert E. Zimmer, Michael Paolella,John P. Morris and James Smith, Jr., Trustees of the UnitedRetail & Wholesale Employees Teamsters Union Local No. 115Pension Plan, Appellees/Cross-Appellants,v.YAHN & Mc DONNELL, INC. and the Pennstar Company, Appel
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986-03-31 · Published · cited 10× · 787 F.2d 128; 54 U.S.L.W. 2527; 7 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1273; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 23637
OPINION OF THE COURT BECKER, Circuit Judge. This case presents three important questions concerning the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (“MPPAA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. (1982): 1) whether MPPAA authorizes a right of action to collect withdrawal liability payments pending arbitration proceedings at which employers withdrawing from the plan may challenge assessments of withdraw
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992-05-27 · Published · cited 30× · 964 F.2d 1308; 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2430; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 12205
964 F.2d 1308 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2430, 122 Lab.Cas. P 10,202 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,Charles M. Carberry, Investigations Officer, Appellee,v.INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS,WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO; theCommission of La Cosa Nostra; Anthony Salerno, also knownas Fat Tony; Matthew Ianniello, also known as Matty theHorse; Anthony P
Massachusetts Superior Court · 2025-06-03 · Published · cited 0×
SUPERIOR COURT HEMBIO, INC. F/K/A HEMERA BIOSCIENCES, INC. v. PAUL FIREMAN, ADAM ROGERS, AND HEMERA BIOSCIENCES, LLC Docket: 2184CV01346-BLS2 Dates: May 13, 2025
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2017-01-05 · Published · cited 6× · 563 B.R. 457; 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 29
OPINION AND ORDER Edward A. Godoy, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Pending before the court are cross motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiffs/counterclaim-defendants MMM Healthcare, Inc. (“MMM”) and PMC Medicare Choice, Inc. (“PMC”) and defen-*462dani/counterclaimant Dr. Virgilio Cora Santiago (“Dr. Cora”), the debtor in the underlying bankruptcy ca
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2025-04-03 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ANCHORAGE POLICE & FIRE ) RETIREMENT SYSTEM and ) TEAMSTERS UNION NO. 142 PENSION ) ) FUND, on behalf of themselves and all other former stockholders of Focus ) Financial Partners Inc., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2024-0354-KSJM
District Court, E.D. Washington · 2013-08-05 · Published · cited 3× · 963 F. Supp. 2d 1145; 2013 WL 3990809; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109904
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT EDWARD F. SHEA, Senior District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court, without oral argument, is Defendants Department of the Interior (“DOI”), Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”), Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”), Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (“BSEE”), Office of Natural Resources Revenue
District Court, E.D. California · 2000-02-03 · Published · cited 17× · 245 B.R. 389; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4472; 2000 WL 226398
245 B.R. 389 (2000) Robert J. MALONE and Esther N. Malone, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. NORWEST FINANCIAL CALIFORNIA, INC., a corporation; and Norwest Financial, Inc., a corporation, Defendants. Robert J. Malone and Esther N. Malone, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. U.S. Bancorp, a corporation; and United States National Bank of Oregon, a corporation
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2003-12-30 · Published · cited 44× · 82 P.3d 411; 103 Haw. 325; 2003 Haw. LEXIS 691
Dissenting Opinion of ACOBA, J. I would affirm the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the February 18, 2000 order by the first circuit court (the court) granting the motion of Lessee-Appellee Dai-ichi Hawai'i Real Estate Corporation (Daii-chi) to vacate the arbitration decision on a finding of evident partiality, Hawai'i Revised Statute (HRS) § 658-9(2) (1993).1 As an
District Court, E.D. New York · 2011-09-30 · Published · cited 5× · 822 F. Supp. 2d 196; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113639; 2011 WL 4593147
822 F.Supp.2d 196 (2011) Greta KANTROWITZ, Plaintiff, v. UNIONDALE UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. No. 08-CV-3592 (JFB)(ETB). United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 30, 2011. *199 Steven A. Morelli, Elaine R. Sammon, and Lorraine M. Ferrigno of the Law Offices of Steven A. Morelli, P.C., Garden Cit
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007-05-02 · Published · cited 1× · 368 B.R. 308; 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 1460; 2007 WL 1267830
368 B.R. 308 (2007) In re WORLDCOM, INC., et al., Reorganized Debtors. No. 02-13533 (AJG). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. May 2, 2007. *309 *310 *311 *312 *313
California Court of Appeal · 2011-05-11 · Published · cited 18× · 195 Cal. App. 4th 440; 125 Cal. Rptr. 3d 655; 39 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2112; 2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 569
Opinion DUARTE, J. In this original writ proceeding we discuss the California Public Records Act (Public Records Act) and the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (Retirement Law). (Gov. Code, §§ 6251 et seq., 31450 et seq.)1 The Public Records Act generally requires public agencies to disclose public records, subject to exemptions. (See International Feder
Bauer v. RBX Corppublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004-05-17 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 Bauer et al. v. RBX Industries, Inc. et al. No. 02-4327 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2004 FED App. 0142P (6th Cir.) File Name: 04a0142p.06 _________________ COUNSEL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999-08-24 · Published · cited 117× · 202 F.3d 138; 23 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2068; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 20032
KAPLAN, District Judge. Plaintiffs late husband applied to purchase certain group life insurance upon his employment by defendant Goldman, Sachs & Co. (“Goldman”). The application was approved, but Goldman’s alleged negligence in dealing with the application delayed its effective date until four days after the death of the insured. Plaintiff here seeks reve
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012-12-17 · Published · cited 1× · 912 F. Supp. 2d 494; 2012 WL 6567560; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177959
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [47] NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge. From 1998 through 2008, Plaintiff Sam Tocco gave millions of dollars to Joseph *497Zada, either as loans or for investments, and it is undisputed that Zada still owes Tocco approximately $5 million.. (Defs.’ Exs. 13, Pl.’s Ans. to Interrog. No.
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2026-07-24 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PAUL BERGER, AS TRUSTEE FOR ) THE PAUL BERGER REVOCABLE ) TRUST and KEVIN BARNES, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2025-1183-BWD ) JAMES FOX, LUIS A. AGUILAR, ) GAYLE CROWELL, VALERIE ) MOS
California Court of Appeal · 2020-11-23 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 11/20/20 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR THE PEOPLE, A160701, A160706 Plaintiff and Respondent, (City & County of San Francisco v.
California Court of Appeal · 2020-10-22 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 10/22/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A160701, A160706 v. (City & County of San Francisco UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Super. Ct. No. CGC-20-584402) Defendants and Appella
Panzer v. Doylepublic domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004-05-13 · Published · cited 47× · 2004 WI 52; 680 N.W.2d 666; 271 Wis. 2d 295; 2004 Wisc. LEXIS 419
271 Wis.2d 295 (2004) 2004 WI 52 680 N.W.2d 666 Mary E. PANZER, personally and as Majority Leader of the Wisconsin Senate, John G. Gard, personally and as Speaker of the Wisconsin Assembly, and Joint Committee on Legislative Organization, Petitioners, v. James E. DOYLE, in his official capacity as Governor of Wisconsin and Marc J. Marotta, in his official capacity as acting Secretary of the Wisconsi