⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Teague v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company”

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993-03-02 · Published · cited 0× · 109 N.C. App. 276; 426 S.E.2d 457; 1993 N.C. App. LEXIS 216
LEWIS, Judge. Defendant issued a renter’s insurance policy to plaintiff effective 10 November 1988 to 10 November 1989. Plaintiffs apartment was burglarized the weekend of 23-24 September 1989. Upon notification of the theft by plaintiff, defendant issued a $1,000 check to her which she promptly cashed. On 13 October 1989 plaintiff submitted a personal property inventory form listing the items stolen, including an Epson comput
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012-06-21 · Published · cited 2× · 868 F. Supp. 2d 1335; 2012 WL 2368541; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85679
Memorandum Opinion and Order MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. I. Introduction Despite experiencing extreme financial difficulty at the time, Todd and Rhonda *1337Pittman — the plaintiffs in this case — went on a European vacation in the summer of 2010. They returned stateside to a burglarized home; their art collection was m
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2020-11-20 · Published · cited 0×
11/20/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 15, 2020 Session CRAIG WILLIAMS ET AL. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-14-0777 JoeDae L. Jenkins, Chancellor _____
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2020-11-20 · Published · cited 0×
11/20/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 15, 2020 Session CRAIG WILLIAMS ET AL. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-14-0777 JoeDae L. Jenkins, Chancellor _____
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009-04-07 · Published · cited 17× · 10 So. 3d 806; 2006 La.App. 1 Cir. 1266R; 2009 La. App. LEXIS 470; 2009 WL 928287
10 So.3d 806 (2009) Michael A. TEAGUE, M.D. v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, St. Paul Insurance Company, Seale, Smith, Zuber and Barnette, Donald Zuber, Catherine Nobile, Catherine Laufer, and ABC Insurance Agency. No. 2006 CA 1266R. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. April 7, 2009. Writ Denied June 17, 2009.
Holland v. Teaguepublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008-09-17 · Published · cited 7× · 996 So. 2d 325; 2008 WL 4225904
996 So.2d 325 (2008) Jeremy Wayne HOLLAND and Laura Christine Holland, Individually and on Behalf of their Deceased Father, Stephen L. Holland, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Charles TEAGUE and Joyce Teague and XYZ Insurance Company, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 43,496-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. September 17, 2008.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004-07-09 · Published · cited 5× · 852 A.2d 227; 371 N.J. Super. 119
852 A.2d 227 (2004) 371 N.J. Super. 119 STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Vincent CONNOLLY, Fred Caruso, Club X's, Defendants, and Teague Hibbard, Defendant-Appellant. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted December 9, 2003. Decided July 9, 2004. *228
Richard v. Teaguepublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994-05-04 · Published · cited 45× · 636 So. 2d 1160; 1994 WL 167794
636 So.2d 1160 (1994) James Ray RICHARD, et al, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gerald TEAGUE, et al, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-17. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. May 4, 1994. Rehearing Denied June 20, 1994. *1163 Robert C. McCall, for James Ray Richard, et al. Alfred Veazie Pavy Boudreaux, for
Teague v. Adamspublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994-03-11 · Published · cited 8× · 638 So. 2d 836; 1994 WL 72485
Sandra Lynne Teague appeals from a judgment based on a directed verdict entered in favor of James Adams, doing business as Dixieland Motors. Because Mrs. Teague submitted substantial evidence to support her cause of action, we reverse and remand. While Mrs. Teague was test-driving a used vehicle owned by Dixieland Motors ("Dixieland"), the vehicle began to shake and pull to one side, eventually leaving the road and crashing into a tree at the bottom of an embankment. Mrs. Teagu
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999-06-10 · Published · cited 16× · 985 P.2d 1183; 127 N.M. 603; 1999 NMCA 109
ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING BUSTAMANTE, Judge. {76} All parties have requested rehearing on various aspects of our opinion filed March 8,1999. After due consideration, we have determined to deny the requests. However, one aspect of the motions — addressing the proper standard for granting punitive damages in insurance-bad-faith cases — requires extended discussion. Rat
New Mexico Supreme Court · 2004-01-20 · Published · cited 83× · 85 P.3d 230; 135 N.M. 106; 2004 NMSC 004
85 P.3d 230 (2004) 135 N.M. 106 2004-NMSC-004 In re Joseph Edward Sloan, Debtor. Joseph Edward SLOAN and Byron Z. Moldo, Chapter 7, Trustee, Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant. No. 27,928. Supreme Court of New Mexico. January 20,
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003-02-12 · Published · cited 0× · 320 F.3d 1073; 2003 WL 297807
CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION OF STATE LAW PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge. The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, N.M. Stat. Ann. §§ 39-7-1 to 39-7-13 (2002) and N.M. R.App. P. 12-607, desires to submit to the Supreme Court of New Mexico a request that the Court exercise its discretion to accept the followin
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004-03-04 · Published · cited 9× · 360 F.3d 1220; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 4215
PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees Sloan (Debtor and Insured) and Moldo (Bankruptcy Trustee) appeal from the district court’s judgment awarding $560,000 in compensatory damages based upon breach of contract, bad faith failure to settle, and a violation of the New Mexico Insurance Practices Act. Defendant-Ap-pellee/Cross-Appellant State Farm (In
Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994-03-29 · Published · cited 9× · 869 P.2d 1130; 73 Wash. App. 479; 1994 Wash. App. LEXIS 129; 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1658
73 Wn. App. 479 (1994) 869 P.2d 1130 TEAGUE MOTOR COMPANY, INC., ET AL, Respondents, v. FEDERATED SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. No. 12787-7-III. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three. March 29, 1994. Patrick K. Shine and Lukins & Annis P.S.; Michael G. Black, for appellant. James K. Hayner
Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2001-01-23 · Published · cited 2× · 621 N.W.2d 553; 9 Neb. Ct. App. 872; 2001 Neb. App. LEXIS 14
621 N.W.2d 553 (2001) 9 Neb.App. 872 STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, and Robert J. Hitz III, Appellee. No. A-99-1463. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. January 23, 2001. *556 Dean J. Sitzmann and Fred B. Campbell,
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006-11-07 · Published · cited 1× · 636 S.E.2d 207; 180 N.C. App. 215; 2006 N.C. App. LEXIS 2238
TYSON, Judge. Patricia Lowe, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, and Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company (collectively, "defendants") appeal from an order entered 9 December 2005 granting North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company's ("plaintiff") motion for summary judgment and denying defendants' motion for summary judgment. We reverse and remand. I. Background Patricia Lowe
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016-12-30 · Published · cited 1× · 796 S.E.2d 29; 251 N.C. App. 385; 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 1354; 2016 WL 7976125
McGEE, Chief Judge. *386 I. Background David Wichnoski, O.D., P.A., d/b/a Spectrum Eye Care ("Spectrum") (together with Wichnoski RE, LLC, "Plaintiffs"), is a professional corporation engaged in the practice of optometry in Unit 105 ("the unit" or "Plaintiffs' unit") of
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1966-01-06 · Published · cited 0× · 279 Ala. 111; 182 So. 2d 375; 1966 Ala. LEXIS 957
Coverage under an insurance policy cannot be created or be enlarged by waiver or estoppel. Mooradian v. Canal Ins. Co.,272 Ala. 373, 130 So.2d 915; Inland Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hightower,274 Ala. 52, 145 So.2d 422; 1 A.L.R.3d 1139. All the elements of a binding contract, including a new consideration, are essential to alter a contract so as to create a primary
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023-02-08 · Published · cited 22× · 59 F.4th 1176
USCA11 Case: 21-12493 Document: 53-1 Date Filed: 02/08/2023 Page: 1 of 38 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-12493 ____________________ CHERRI WALKER,
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-12-18 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00478-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/18