Cases

83 F.3d 436 Taylorv.Rice NO. 94-8739 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Apr 02, 1996 1 Appeal From: M.D.Ga., No. 90-00277-5-CV-4-MAC 2 REVERSED IN PART, VACATED

FILED 17-0081 12/22/2017 12:48 PM

ACCEPTED FILED: 10/30/2015 5:03:25 PM02-15-00342-CV SECOND COURT OF APPEALS SHERRI ADELSTEIN D

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH. RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge. Lorenzo Taylor appeals from a district court order granting the Secretary of State’s motion for summary judgment. Taylor claimed that the State Department violated the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701-796Í, when it refused to hire him as a Foreign Service Officer

94 P.3d 659 (2004) 105 Hawai`i 104 Debbie TAYLOR-RICE, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Alexa Dawn Taylor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE of Hawai`i, Defendant-Appellee, and Kenneth Richard Leigh; John Does 1-10; Jane Does 1-10; Doe Partnerships 1-10; Doe Corporations 1-10; Roe "Nonprofit" Corporations 1-10; and Roe Governmental Entities 1-10, Defendants. Edward J. Blasie, Sr., Individual

202 S.W.3d 565 (2005) LILLIE TAYLOR, Appellant v. PRODUCERS RICE MILL, INC. and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellees CA 04-488 Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division I Opinion Delivered February 9, 2005 KAREN R. BAKER, Judge Appellant, Lillie Taylor, appeals the denial of her workers' compensation claim for additional benefits relating to her compensab

979 P.2d 1086 (1999) 91 Hawai`i 60 Debbie TAYLOR-RICE, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Alexa Dawn Taylor, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE of Hawai`i, Defendant-Appellant, and Kenneth Richard Leigh; Linda Nusser; Citizens Utilities Company, a Delaware corporation, dba Kaua`i Electric; GTE Hawaiian Tel Corp., Inc., a Hawai`i corporation, dba GTE Hawaiian Tel Co. Corp.; John Does 1-10; Jane Does

PER CURIAM This interlocutory appeal arises from respondent Taylor Rice's suit contesting the validity of a sex offender residency restrictions ordinance enacted by petitioner, the City of Krum. Krum presents issues regarding Rice's standing to bring this suit and the trial court's jurisdiction over a civil challenge to an allegedly penal ordinance. We do not reach these issues, however, because Rice's claims were rendered moot dur

KERRY FITZGERALD, Justice, dissenting. Appellee Taylor Rice attacks an ordinance that the parties agree is a criminal ordinance proscribing the parameters of where he wanted to live, that is, with his parents, when the same proscription was part of his probationary conditions. Even if Rice prevailed on his attack on the ordinance, he would still be precluded from living in his parents’ house because of

Conner, J. This is the third time the parties appear before us on appeal. The former wife appeals the final order entered after an evi-dentiary hearing on her motion for contempt. In the motion, the former. wife sought an adjudication of contempt against the former husband and a determination of the lump sum alimony arrearage which accrued fo

[Cite as State v. Taylor, 2016-Ohio-7745.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellant, : CASE NO. 2016-A-0022 - vs - : RODNEY P. TAYLOR, JR.,

KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: My colleagues and I agree that the only way Kathy Adams (Adams) survives summary judgment in favor of the U.S. Department of State (Department) on her Rehabilitation Act claim is under 29 U.S.C. § 705(20)(B)(ii), the “record of impairment” definition of “disability.”1 Applying *955

REINHARD, Judge. Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the trial court dismissing their petition alleging breach of contract and tortious interference with contract by defendants. We affirm. This case presents one principal issue for resolution: Does plaintiffs’ failure to appeal the trial court’s possibly erroneous dismissal with prejudice of their causes of action preclude them from refiling and pursuing t

JUSTICE HOOD delivered the Opinion of the Court., T1 Under the Colorado Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act ("CUFTA"), §§ 88-8-101 to -112, C.R.S. (2015), any action to avoid an intentionally fraudulent transfer is extinguished if not brought within four years after the transfer was made or, if later, within one year after the transfer was or. could reasonably have been discovered, § 38-8-110(1)(a). In this c

BYE, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The umbrella policy Allstate Indemnity issued to the Underwoods contains an ambiguity which must be construed in Rice’s favor, and results in coverage for the Un-derwoods’ personal activity of allowing the permissive use of their vehicle by Howard Wiebe. I therefore dissent from the decision to affirm the district court. Under the section of the umbrella poli

NAKAMOTO, J. Defendant appeals a judgment convicting him of first-degree burglary, ORS 164.225, assigning error to the trial court’s failure to acquit him of that crime. As relevant here, the first-degree burglary statute requires the state to establish that a defendant unlawfully entered a “dwelling,” as defined in ORS 164.205(2). In this case, defendant entered a mostly enclosed, roofed area between and connected to a house

JUSTICE COTTER delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Kevin Mark Taylor (Taylor) appeals from an order of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, denying his petition for postconviction relief. We affirm. ISSUE ¶2 We restate the following issue on appeal:

623 S.E.2d 477 (2005) 280 Ga. 88 TAYLOR v. TAYLOR. No. S05F1412. Supreme Court of Georgia. December 1, 2005. *478 Sarah M. Tipdon-Downie, Vidalia, for appellant. Howard C. Kaufold, Jr., Durden, Kaufold, Rice & Barfield, P.C., Vidalia, for appellee. SEARS, Chief Justice. Husband, Ch

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Victor B. White seeks to appeal the district court’s text orders dismissing some, but not all defendants, and denying recon*445sideration in this civil rights action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Victor B. White seeks to appeal the district court’s text orders dismissing some, but not all defendants, and denying recon*445sideration in this civil rights action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only