Cases

David Newbern, Justice, concurring. In Lane v. Lane, 295 Ark. 671, 752 S.W.2d 25 (1988), a course of treatment consisting of negligent acts in the form of improper injections continued until less than two years prior to the filing of the action. In this case the only treatment rendered by the doctor occurred more than two years before the action was filed unless it can be said that leaving

791 F.2d 926 Taylorv.Phillips 86-6501 United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. 6/3/86 1 E.D.N.C. AFFIRMED

Wilner, J. We granted certiorari in this case to review, again, the manner in which Article IV, § 22 of the Maryland Constitution, providing for an in banc appeal from a "decision or determination of any point or question" by a Circuit Court judge, is intended to operate. In the end, our decision will be based on the wording of § 22 and Md. Rule 2-551. To be faithful

Leahy, J. Bashunn Phillips (“Appellant”) is charged with the first-degree murder of Shar-Ron Mason and related crimes. Phillips filed a motion in limine to exclude certain cell phone evidence in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, and, on February 12, 2016, the court granted Phillips’s motion. The State sou

Getty, J. This appeal requires us to determine whether a deoxyribonucleic acid (“DNA”) analysis conducted in accordance with the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (“FBI”) Quality Assurance Standards (“QAS”) qualifies for automatic admissibility under § 10-915 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article (“CJP”) of the Maryland Code

FRIEDMAN, J. This case requires us to decide what to do with a statute that appears to be obsolete regarding the admissibility of DNA evidence. Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, appellant Richmond Phillips (“Phillips”) was convicted of two counts of murder in the first degr

OPINION SANDERS, Presiding Judge, Eastern Section. The Defendant has appealed from a chancery decree finding him liable to the trust estate, of which he was Trustee, for failure to sell real estate, which was the primary corpus of the trust estate, and invest the proceeds in more productive securities, and also holding the Defendant liable for outrageous conduct for not being more responsive to the needs

PER CURIAM. On the authority of Aspen v. Bayless, 564 So.2d 1081 (Fla.1990), which was decided after the trial court denied the motion to tax costs and attorneys’ fees, we reverse. We remand for entry of an award for appellant, defendant below, in accordance with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 and sections 768.79 and 45.061, Florida Statutes (1989). SCHEB, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENB

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Moore v. State, 114 So.3d 291 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Simmons v. State, 104 So.3d 1185 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); Perie v. State, 125 So.3d 973 (Fla. 2d DCA June 14, 2013). STEVENSON, TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

The opinion of the court was delivered by Luckert, J.: After a trial ended with a hung jury, Kelvin Phillips, Jr., was retried and convicted of the premeditated first-degree murder of James Earl Dyer, Jr.; conspiracy to commit first-degree murder; and criminal possession of a firearm. On direct appeal from Phillips’ second trial, we consider the three issues Phillips raises. First, we hold that the Kansas crimi

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge This is a no-merit appeal filed on behalf of Charles Douglas Taylor after the Miller County Circuit Court revoked his probation and sentenced him to twelve years' imprisonment. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738,

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:A petition for certification of the judgment in A-000625-16 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.

CASANUEVA, Judge. James David Phillips appeals his judgments and sentences for sexual battery on a person less than twelve years of age and lewd and lascivious molestation on a person less than twelve years of age. He raises several issues on appeal, but we find merit only in his argument that his judgment for lewd and lascivious molestation should be remanded to omit the language stating that the victim was less than twelve

TERENCE KERN, United States District Judge Before the Court are (1) Defendant Phillips 66 Company's Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support ("Motion for Summary Judgment") (Doc. 49) and (2) the parties' briefs regarding Plaintiff's claim for benefits under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), pursuant to the Court's July 26, 2017 ERISA Scheduling Order (Doc. 35): (a) Plaintiff's Opening Brief (Doc. 48),

Miller, Presiding Judge. Following a jury trial, Anthony Bernard Taylor was convicted of possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine ( OCGA § 16-13-30 ). Taylor moved for a new trial, which the trial court denied. On appeal, Taylor contends (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his drug conviction; and (2) the trial court abused its discretion in limiting his time for voir dire with certain prospective jurors. Discerni

AFFIRMED.

OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. In 2005, the City of Henderson, Kentucky, raised its taxes. The resulting $500 tab was too dear for James Phillips, a certified public accountant and Henderson resident. He assailed the tax hike before the city council, in the Henderson Gleaner, and in the course of advising his clients. When Tax Day 2006

Taylor, Bankruptcy Judge: INTRODUCTION Appellants, Tammy R. Phillips and Tammy R. Phillips, a Professional Corporation (jointly, "Creditors"), obtained an $8,250 judgment against debtor, Kevan Gilman. Under California law, they were entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees in obtaining and collecting this amount, and the state court awar

PER CURIAM. The trial court’s order establishing visitation is affirmed. Matters and conditions occurring subsequent to the date of the hearing before the trial court upon which its order of April 21, 1987, nunc pro tunc April 26, 1986 (the hearing date), was based, are not within the scope of review on this appeal. AFFIRMED. SMITH, C.J., and BOOTH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.