Cases

Bauer, Circuit Judge. Petitioner-appellant Mack Sims seeks a writ of habeas corpus, arguing his due process rights were violated because the state withheld evidence favorable to his case. In November of 1993, security guard Shane Carey was shot in Elkhart, Indiana. Approximately fifteen to twenty minutes after the shooting, the Elkhart police found Mack Sims near a walking path around twenty feet from where the shooting occurred. Af

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 18-1573 MACK A. SIMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WILLIAM HYATTE, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. No. 3:14-cv-01936-RLM — Robert L. Miller,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 18-1573 MACK A. SIMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WILLIAM HYATTE, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. No. 3:14-cv-01936-RLM — Robert L. Miller,

MEMORANDUM WILLIAM M. NICKERSON, Senior District Judge. This case involves claims of employment discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment as to all claims, filed by Defendant Peninsula Regional Medical Center (“PRMC”). ECF No. 19. In his Opposition, Plaintiff Brandon Taylor (

ORDER In light of the parties’ September 24, 2008, Stipulation to Dismiss Appeal No. 06-17403, this case is resubmitted. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b), this case is DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

By order of May 2, 2017, the application for leave to appeal the September 22, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v Hyatt (Docket No. 153081). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on June 20, 2018, 502 Mich 89,

OPINION FONES, Justice. Plaintiff, taxpayer, sued the Commissioner of Revenue alleging that the State has erroneously assessed sales taxes upon gross receipts from a portion of his business operations. The trial judge found that the “continuous supervision” exemption, applicable to the lease and rental of tangible personal property, applied and thus plaintiff was not liable for the taxes assessed. We reverse.

STROUD, Judge. *222 Rodney Nigee Pledger Taylor ("defendant") appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of first-degree murder. Among defendant's arguments on appeal, defendant argued that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because he invoked h

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra

Taylor v New Jersey Tr. Corp. (2021 NY Slip Op 06462) Taylor v New Jersey Tr. Corp. 2021 NY Slip Op 06462 Decided on November 18, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Burea

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra

Taylor v New Jersey Tr. Corp. (2021 NY Slip Op 06462) Taylor v New Jersey Tr. Corp. 2021 NY Slip Op 06462 Decided on November 18, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Burea

Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 497 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CR-22-707 AARON SCOTT TAYLOR Opinion Delivered November 1, 2023 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE SALINE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V.

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0206p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ BRENDON TAYLOR, │ Plain

OPINION GEMMILL, Judge. ¶ 1 Emory Ray Stout appeals a superior court judgment denying his special action petition seeking transcripts rather than electronic recordings of justice court proceedings in anticipation of filing an Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32 (“Rule 32”) of-right petition for post-conviction relief. Because Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.4(d) (“Rule 32.4(d)”) provides for “tran

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan April 5, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 154994

ROBINSON, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with and join part I of the majority opinion. I dissent, however, from part II of the opinion because I conclude that the jury had sufficient evidence to find the defendant, Christopher Taylor, guilty of reckless driving. The state charged the defendant with reckl

669 S.E.2d 239 (2008) STATE of North Carolina v. Eddie Lamar TAYLOR. No. 719A05. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 12, 2008. *249 Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by William B. Crumpler and Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorneys General, for the state. Staples Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Anne M. Gomez and Daniel K.

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case arises out of the horrific bombing of the United States Marine Corp barracks in Beirut, Lebanon in 1983. The attack destroyed the facility, killing 241 servicemen and leaving scores wounded. Plaintiffs are family members of eight servicemen killed in the explosi