Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Taylor v. City of New York”
Taylor v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Taylor v City of New York (2019 NY Slip Op 08924) Taylor v City of New York 2019 NY Slip Op 08924 Decided on December 12, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursua
Taylor v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Harriet Taylor, Respondent, The againstCity of New York, Appellant. Rich, Intelisano & Katz, LLP (Robert J. Howard of counsel), for appellant. Harriet Taylor, respondent pro se. Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Cenceria P. Edwards, J.), entered January 18, 2018. The order denied defendant's motion to vacate a judgment of
Taylor v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
*297OPINION & ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge. Plaintiff Tiffany Taylor brings this employment discrimination action against the City of New York and her former employer, the New York City Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”). Taylor alleges that she was discriminated against on the basis of her sex, race, color, and na
Taylor v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
OPINION & ORDER ROBERT P. PATTERSON, JR., District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On July 31, 2012, Plaintiff Dwaine Taylor1 (“Plaintiff’) filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City of New York, the New York City Department of Correction (“DOC”), Supervising Warden Arthur Olivari, Chiefs of Department Larry W. Davis, Sr. and Michael Hourihane, Warden Will
Matter of Taylor v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.), entered September 25, 2014, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denying the petition to annul a determination of respondents, dated December 6, 2013, which denied petitioner’s appeal of an unsatisfactory performance rating (U-rating) for the 2012-2013 school year, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, u
Taylor v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Taylor v City of New York 2026 NY Slip Op 03128 May 19, 2026 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. Otis Taylor, Appellant, v The City of New York, et al., Respondents. Decided and Entered: May 19
Taylor v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
269 F.Supp.2d 68 (2003) Benyamin TAYLOR Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Sgt. James Ryan, Sgt. Charles Trentacosta, P.O. Murray, Det. Povermo, Det. Bobbet, Det. Cummings, Undercover # 11012, Undercover # 7604, and Does1-10 Defendants. No. 01-CV-5750 ILG. United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 23, 2003. *69 Jon L. Norins
Taylor v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
953 F.Supp. 95 (1997) James TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK; Allyn Sielaff, individually and in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Correctional Services; Robert DeRosa, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Anna M. Kross Center (C-95) Prison; Deputy Warden Rosado; Deputy Warden Bedron; Captain Perez; Officer Rodriguez; Officer Torres; Officer Tucker: individually and in their capac
Taylor v. New York City Hous. Auth.public domain
Taylor v New York City Hous. Auth. (2024 NY Slip Op 03099) Taylor v New York City Hous. Auth. 2024 NY Slip Op 03099 Decided on June 06, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J
Taylor v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
*530OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. Judgment unanimously modified and new trial ordered on the issue of liability only and as so modified affirmed without costs. The jury determination as to damages is affirmed. Order unanimously reversed without costs and motion for indemnification denied. In this negligence action for pe
Taylor v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Evans, J.), entered December 22, 1988, which, after jury trial, found in favor of defendants against plaintiffs and dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. The Supreme Court marshaled the evidence in this complex medical malpractice case, submitting each alleged act of malpractice to the jury by way of special interrogatories. The jury found in favor of defendants. We
Taylor v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Ira B. Harkavy, J. The court is required to determine the validity of an indemnification clause in a lease between Arenia and Ernestine Institute, Inc. as landlord-lessor (Arenia) and the City of New York, as tenant-lessee (City). On or about May 4, 1972, pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Estimate, adopted November 11, 1971, the City entered into a lease
Taylor v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
In a proceeding seeking the entry of an order of filiation declaring the infant petitioners to be the children of Rudolph Taylor, Jr., deceased, and to have the infant petitioners’ birth certificates amended to show their legal surnames and to include the surname of their biological father, the petitioners appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated March 12, 1986, which denied the application for an order of filiation an
Taylor v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ralph A. Beisner, J., on assessment of damages; Irwin M. Silbowitz, J., on issue of liability), entered on June 20, 1984, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages only, without costs and without disbursements, unless plaintiff Isaiah Taylor, within 20 days after service upon his attorney of a copy of the order to be entered herein with notice of entry, serves and fi
Taylor v. New York City Transit Authoritypublic domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), entered January 24, 2012, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability finding that the defendant Jim Jones was not negligent in the operation of his motor vehicle, is in favor of the defendants and against him, in effect, dismissing the complaint.
Taylor v. New York City Housing Authoritypublic domain
In an action, inter alla, to recover damages for wrongful death, etc., the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J), dated March 8, 2012, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The defendant failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement
Taylor v. New York City Housing Authoritypublic domain
In an action, inter alla, to recover damages for wrongful death, etc., the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J), dated March 8, 2012, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The defendant failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement
Taylor v. New York City Housing Authoritypublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT David I. Schmidt, J. Defendant New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) moves for an order (1) vacating the note of issue and certificate of readiness filed by plaintiffs llene Taylor, as administratrix of the estate of Geraldine Taylor, Roshawn Taylor, an infant, by his mother and natural guardian, Sheohnna Taylor, Sheohnna Taylor, individually, and Terence Vaughn, individually and as
Taylor v. City of Buffalopublic domain
Taylor v City of Buffalo (2024 NY Slip Op 03632) Taylor v City of Buffalo 2024 NY Slip Op 03632 Decided on July 3, 2024 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.<
Taylor v. City of Buffalopublic domain
Taylor v City of Buffalo (2024 NY Slip Op 03632) Taylor 2024 NY Slip Op 03632 Decided on July 3, 2024 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.