Cases

274 S.W.3d 629 (2009) Glennda TAYLOR, Appellant, v. BALLARD R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent; Treasurer of the State of Missouri— Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent. No. WD 69406. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. January 27, 2009. *630 John R. Stanley, Overland Park, KS, for appellant. Howard C

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS David Taylor, FILED Petitioner Below, Petitioner March 29, 2013 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APP

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Edward J. Mercer seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting in part and declining to adopt in part the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, and dismissing as untimely all but one of Mercer’s claims in his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. This c

*299 LANDAU, J. The issue in this mandamus proceeding is whether the trial court correctly denied defendants’ motion to change venue. ORS 14.080(2) provides that venue is proper wherever a defendant engages in “regular, sustained business activity.” In this case, plaintiffs, a husband and wife, initiated

OPINION I. INTRODUCTION In this case we hold that: (1) orders imposing monetary discovery sanctions are not made appealable by subdivision (k) of Code of Civil Procedure section 904.1, and (2) even if they were, the order challenged in this case could not be appealed because the amount of the sanction did not exceed the statutory appealability threshold of $750. Thomas O. Ballard purports to appeal from an order impo

ORDER OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION 11 Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides that "[in any case in which it appears that a prior controlling appellate decision is dispositive of the appeal, the court may summarily affirm or reverse, citing in its order of summary disposition this rule and the controlling decision." Okla. S.Ct. Rule 1.201. 2 After reviewing the record in this case, THE COURT FINDS that ou

PER CURIAM. We affirm the judgments of conviction without prejudice to appellant’s right to raise an ineffective assistance of counsel claim pursuant to rule 3.850. See York v. State, 731 So.2d 802 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Mills v. State, 714 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Rodriguez v. State, 715 So.2d 329 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Geddis v. State, 715 So.2d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from a non-final order transferring venue from Palm Beach County to Santa Rosa County. The trial court has broad discretion in dealing with issues of venue. Groome v. Abrams, 448 So.2d 82 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). Appellant has failed to meet his burden of showing an abuse of that discretion. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). Ac

358 F.Supp. 409 (1973) Deward H. BALLARD, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Robert Pendleton TAYLOR et al., Defendants. No. EC 72-84-S. United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, E. D. April 25, 1973. *410 David W. Houston, III, of Houston, Chamberlin & Houston, Aberdeen, Miss., for plaintiff. Taylor B. Smith, of Threadgill &

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-294 No. COA21-202 Filed 3 May 2022 Brunswick County, Nos. 09-CRS-56342, 09-CRS-56348, 09-CRS-56687 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. JABAR BALLARD, Defendant. Appeal by Defendant from order entered 15 October 2020 by Judge J. Stanley Carmical in Brunswick Co

The plaintiff, Henry W. Taylor, appeals from a judgment quieting his title to twenty-four and one-half acres of land in the Claremont district of Berkeley, *Page 234 subject to a right of way across it, adjudged to belong to the respondents, E. D. Walden and Virginia E. Walden. The parties claim from a common source of title. E. E. Hewlett and Ione Fore Hewlett, his wife, the common grantors, acquired title to twenty-seven acres of land, bounded on

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-294 No. COA21-202 Filed 3 May 2022 Brunswick County, Nos. 09-CRS-56342, 09-CRS-56348, 09-CRS-56687 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. JABAR BALLARD, Defendant. Appeal by Defendant from order entered 15 October 2020 by Judge J. Stanley Carmical in Brunswick Co

Smith, Presiding Judge. Kurtis Taylor petitioned to adopt his stepson, R. C. J, and to terminate the parental rights of Frederick Johnson, R. C. J.’s biological father, pursuant to OCGA §§ 19-8-6 and 19-8-10. Johnson objected and sought to maintain his parental rights in his son. Following a hearing, the trial court granted Taylor’s petition and entered a final decree of adoption. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

Ray Washam and Ballard Services, Inc. (together hereinafter referred to as "Ballard"), appeal from an order denying their motion to compel arbitration of an action filed against them and others by Rosa Conner and her husband Joseph Conner. We reverse and remand. According to the allegations in the complaint, a dispute arose when the house owned by the Conners was damaged by fire. At that time, the Conners had in force a homeowners' insurance policy with Odessy Re (London) Ltd.

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED MEMORANDUM OPINION FARNAN, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint to add Lieutenant Paul Harvey as a Defendant (D.I. 87). For the reasons discussed, the Court will grant Plaintiffs motion. I. Background On October 26, 2004, Plaintiff Timothy Ward filed the present actio

OPINION OF THE COURT Chief Judge Lippman. The issue presented by this appeal is whether plaintiff Aurora Loan Services, LLC had standing to commence this mortgage foreclosure action. We now affirm that part of the Appellate Division order (114 AD3d 627 [2d Dept 2014]) upholding Supreme Court’s grant of summary

SUPERIOR COURT COMMONWEALTH vs. SAGE BALLARD Docket: 2081CR0308 Dates: November 2, 2021 Present: David A. Deakin Associate

JARVIS BALLARD * NO. 2024-CA-0606 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM ST. BERNAR

978 F.Supp. 751 (1997) Danny B. BALLARD, Plaintiff, v. VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, Defendant. No. 95-2868 M1/V. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. July 21, 1997. *752 *753 Jeffery D. Parrish, Borod & Kramer, Memphis, TN, for Plaintiff. Frederick J. Lewis,

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiff in this case, the former Dean of Students at Defendant Perry Street Preparatory Public Charter School (“Perry Street”), alleges that Defendant discriminated against him on the-basis of his gender when it,denied him a promotion, and subsequently retaliated against him for filing a co