⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Tate v. State of Maryland”

Tate v. Marylandpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-02-19 · Published · cited 0× · 139 S. Ct. 1245; 203 L. Ed. 2d 265
Petition for rehearing denied.
Tate v. Marylandpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2018-11-05 · Published · cited 0× · 139 S. Ct. 465; 202 L. Ed. 2d 355
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.
Tate v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2018-06-25 · Published · cited 1× · 187 A.3d 660; 459 Md. 587
Greene, J. I. The dispositive question before us in this case is whether, under the totality of the circumstances, Petitioner Brian Arthur Tate knowingly and voluntarily pleaded guilty to first-degree murder. After failing to seek leave to appeal his conviction following his guilty plea and failing to obtain requested postconviction relief,
Tate v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2017-12-18 · Published · cited 0× · 175 A.3d 151; 456 Md. 524
Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Transferred to the regular docket as No. 65, Sept.Term, 2017.
Tate v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2017-12-18 · Published · cited 0× · 456 Md. 524; 175 A.3d 151
Opinion of the Court of Special Appeals unreported (No. 2823, Sept.Term, 2014). Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Transferred to the regular docket as No. 65, Sept.Term, 2017.
Tate v. Statepublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008-10-02 · Published · cited 20× · 957 A.2d 640; 182 Md. App. 114; 2008 Md. App. LEXIS 120
957 A.2d 640 (2008) 182 Md. App. 114 Darren Joseph TATE v. STATE of Maryland. No. 0284, Sept. Term, 2006. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. October 2, 2008. *641 Celia A. Davis (Nancy S. Forster, Public Defender, on brief), for Appellant. Carrie J. Williams (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen., on br
Tate v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008-06-12 · Published · cited 5× · 950 A.2d 100; 405 Md. 106; 2008 Md. LEXIS 314
950 A.2d 100 (2008) 405 Md. 106 Darren Joseph TATE v. STATE of Maryland. No. 34, September Term, 2008. Court of Appeals of Maryland. June 12, 2008. Celia Anderson Davis, Assistant Public Defender (Nancy S. Forster, Public Defender), Baltimore, for petitioner. Carrie J. Williams, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen.), Baltim
Tate v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2009-01-01 · Published · cited 0× · 983 A.2d 433; 411 Md. 358
983 A.2d 433 (2009) 411 Md. 358 RASHAAD G. TATE v. STATE. Pet. Docket No. 330. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Denied November 13, 2009. Petition for writ of certiorari denied.
Tate v. Statepublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007-09-27 · Published · cited 12× · 933 A.2d 447; 176 Md. App. 365; 2007 Md. App. LEXIS 132
933 A.2d 447 (2007) 176 Md. App. 365 Darren Joseph TATE v. STATE of Maryland. No. 0284, Sept. Term, 2006. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. September 27, 2007. *450 Celia A. Davis (Nancy A. Forster, Public Defender, on brief), for appellant. Carrie J. Williams (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen., on
Tate v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008-01-01 · Published · cited 0× · 962 A.2d 373
962 A.2d 373 (2008) DARREN J. TATE v. STATE. Pet. Docket No. 476. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Denied December 30, 2008. Petition for writ of certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008-05-06 · Published · cited 65× · 524 F.3d 449; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 9697; 2008 WL 1947906
524 F.3d 449 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Davon TATE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-4026. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: January 30, 2008. Decided: May 6, 2008. *450 ARGUED: Martin Gregory Bahl, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel
State v. Tatepublic domain
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2013-11-05 · Published · cited 171× · 130 So. 3d 829; 102 A.L.R. 6th 865; 2013 WL 5912118; 2013 La. LEXIS 2376
KNOLL, Justice. 11 This criminal post-conviction proceeding presents the res nova issue of whether Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), in which the United States Supreme Court held mandatory life imprisonment without parole for juvenile homicide offenders violates the Eighth Amendment prohibition of cruel and unusual punishments, applies retroactively in state collateral p
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-07-17 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) STATE OF MARYLAND, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 1:17-cv-2139 (KBJ) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) EDUCATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-10-22 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) DELORES FORD, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17-2525 (ABJ) ) STATE OF MARYLAND )
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015-02-03 · Published · cited 0× · 221 Md. App. 425; 109 A.3d 182; 2015 Md. App. LEXIS 19
HOTTEN, J. Appellant, the Comptroller of Maryland (“the State”), appeals from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, granting appellee’s, Kenneth R. Shipe’s, motion to release a tax judgment lien held by the State for unpaid income taxes regarding the 1997 and 1998 tax years. The State noted an appeal and pre
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2014-10-17 · Published · cited 6× · 521 B.R. 427
OPINION AND ORDER FINDING RESPONDENT REMAINS IN CONTEMPT AND RENEWING REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF AN ARREST WARRANT JOHN S. DALIS, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter is before me on remand from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia (“District Court”) following Debtor Kipp Leshone Tate’s appeal of my Order of Civil Contempt and Application for the Issuance of an Arrest War
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024-01-23 · Published · cited 2× · 91 F.4th 238
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1351 Doc: 70 Filed: 01/23/2024 Pg: 1 of 23 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-1351 MARYLAND SHALL ISSUE, INC.; FIELD TRADERS LLC; CINDY’S HOT SHOTS, INC.; PASADENA ARMS, LLC; WORTH-A-SHOT, INC.,
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2014-07-24 · Published · cited 2× · 357 Wis. 2d 172; 2014 WI 89; 849 N.W.2d 798; 2014 WL 3672705; 2014 Wisc. LEXIS 697
*202SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J. ¶ 52. (<dissenting). "Advances in technology offer great benefits to society in many areas. At the same time, they can pose significant risks to individual privacy rights."1 The proliferation of cell phones and their location tracking capabilities exemplify the risks to privacy rights posed by technol
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021-05-28 · Published · cited 14× · 999 F.3d 374
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0121p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Ap
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2012-12-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 19, 2012 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. HOWARD LAVELLE TATE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2009-A-75 Steve Dozier, Judge No. M2010-02555-CCA-R3-CD Filed December 17, 2012 The defendant, Howard Lavelle Tate, was convicted of two counts of the sale of over 0.5 grams o