Cases

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge Paul and Melissa Klein, in their own right and on behalf of their minor child D.K., filed this appeal of a Hearing Officer Determination, alleging that the District of Columbia denied D.K. a free appropriate public education in violation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement A

Cite as 2017 Ark. 326 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-16-990 DESOTO GATHERING COMPANY Opinion Delivered November 30, 2017 LLC; DESOTO DRILLING APPELLANTS APPEAL FROM THE FAULKNER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 23CV-15-1218]

896 N.E.2d 791 (2008) The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Salvador ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-06-1314. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division. September 8, 2008. *792 Mark A. Oates, Angela C. Vigil and Jenny A. Austin of counsel, Baker & McKenzie, LLP, Chicago, for Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Carolina Lopez-Young 1 bri

MEMORANDUM OPINION RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Tadeusz Latynski-Rossiter is a nineteen-year-old student who suffers from learning disabilities. To address his needs, his parents placed him in a private school in Maryland. They seek reimbursement for his tuition under the Individuals with Disabilitie

Re Document No.: 21,23 MEMORANDUM OPINION RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs are the parents of children with special needs who litigated cases *99 brought against the Distr

MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment! Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs, the parents of T.C., a minor child with special needs, seek to recover from Defendant, the District of Columbia

Cite as 2019 Ark. App. 419 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS Digitally signed by Elizabeth DIVISION I Perry No. CR-18-793 Date: 2022.07.26 13:27:24 -05'00' Adobe Acrobat version: 2022.001.20169 Opinion Delivered: September 25, 2019 MICHAEL JENKINS APPEAL FR

JUSTICE BURKE delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Freeman, Thomas, Kilbride, Garman, and Karmeier concurred in the judgment and opinion. OPINION Defendant Salvador Ortiz was convicted of first degree murder after a bench trial and sentenced to 47 years in priso

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Appellat

FIRST DIVISION SEPTEMBER 08, 2008 No. 1-06-1314 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of Plaintiff-Appellee, ) Cook County.

NUMBERS 13-10-00427-CR 13-10-00428-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG DON STONE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appell

NUMBERS

919 N.E.2d 941 (2009) 235 Ill.2d 319 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Salvador ORTIZ, Appellee. No. 107363. Supreme Court of Illinois. November 19, 2009. *943 Lisa Madigan, Attorney General, Springfield, Richard A. Devine and Anita Alvarez, State's Attorneys, Chicago (James E. Fitzgerald,

ANDERSON, J.: Appellant Willie Earl Reese, Jr. was indicted and charged with the murder of his wife Teresa. Following a jury trial, he was found guilty and sentenced to thirty-five years in prison. He now appeals, asserting the trial court erred in the admission of hearsay testimony, the admission of photographs of the victim’s body and autopsy, denying certain requested jury charges, and failing to grant a mistrial based on

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams