⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Tara Wilcox”

Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008-10-16 · Published · cited 0× · 214 P.3d 466; 2008 Colo. App. LEXIS 1424; 2008 WL 4592122
214 P.3d 466 (2008) Clark DeWITT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TARA WOODS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Minnesota limited partnership, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06CA2006. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II. October 16, 2008. Rehearing Denied January 22, 2009. Certiorari Denied August 17, 2009. Wilcox & Ogden, P.C., Ralph Ogden, Denver, Colora
California Court of Appeal · 2006-07-17 · Published · cited 7× · 45 Cal. Rptr. 3d 902; 141 Cal. App. 4th 418; 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6433; 2006 Daily Journal DAR 9321; 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1082
45 Cal.Rptr.3d 902 (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 418 Barry BLUM, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; Copley Press, Inc. et al., Real Parties in Interest. No. B189560. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Seven. July 17, 2006. *903 Mark Weidmann and Lee Franck, Los Angele
California Court of Appeal · 2006-08-22 · Published · cited 31× · 47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 206; 141 Cal. App. 4th 1550
47 Cal.Rptr.3d 206 (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 1550 Michael C. SEEVER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COPLEY PRESS, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. B180062. Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Seven. August 15, 2006. As Modified August 22, 2006. *207 Mark Weidman
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016-11-17 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Nov 17 2016, 9:20 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005-09-27 · Published · cited 2× · 705 N.W.2d 195; 2005 Minn. App. LEXIS 765; 2005 WL 2356548
Syllabus by the Court The protections provided by Minn. Stat. § 550.366 (2004) for "farm debtors" who have incurred debt to purchase "agricultural property" are not lost when a "farm debtor" enters another profession after leaving the business of farming. OPINION Appellant Glacial Plains Cooperative ("Glacial Plains") challenges the district court's grant of declaratory and injunct
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000-06-23 · Published · cited 112× · 2000 WI 68; 611 N.W.2d 906; 235 Wis. 2d 781; 2000 Wisc. LEXIS 409
SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, CHIEF JUSTICE ¶ 75. (concurring). I agree with Part VI of the lead opinion that the Gritzners' complaint states a claim against Roger Bubner for negligent failure to control Michael's conduct. The Gritzners' complaint also states a claim against Roger Bubner for negligent failure to warn Tara's parents. But, in contrast to the lead opinion, I would not have this court conclude, after applying pu
State v. Maltbiepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002-08-09 · Published · cited 0× · 113 Wash. App. 1007; 2002 Wash. App. LEXIS 2696
Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 01-1-00636-7, Wm. Thomas McPhee, J., entered August 7, 2001. Reversed by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Morgan and Seinfeld, JJ.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005-01-05 · Published · cited 2× · 126 F. App'x 767
MEMORANDUM * Joaquin Batista (“Batista”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Stewart Enterprises (“Stewart”). As the facts are familiar to the parties, we do not recite them here except as necessary to understand our disposition. We review the district court’s decision on summary judgment de novo, see Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, 349 F.3d 634, 639 (9th Cir.2003), and the
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003-12-03 · Published · cited 0× · 81 F. App'x 986
MEMORANDUM * Price Costco Wholesale Corp. (“Costco”) appeals a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Bradley Cohn, as well as two post-trial awards of attorney’s fees. We affirm. A. The Jury Award The jury’s award was not excessive as a matter of law. California Civil Code section 3333 permits compensation for “all the detriment proximately caused” by emplo
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2001-02-13 · Published · cited 18× · 2001 WI 8; 622 N.W.2d 436; 241 Wis. 2d 110; 2001 Wisc. LEXIS 5
241 Wis.2d 110 (2001) 2001 WI 8 622 N.W.2d 436 Noah FILPPULA-McARTHUR, a minor, by his Guardian ad Litem, Janet S. Angus and Lori McArthur, Plaintiffs-Appellants, James T. BALL, Appellant-Petitioner, v. Thomas HALLOIN, M.D., Bellin Memorial Hospital, Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund, The Medical Protective Company, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Physicians Insurance of Wisconsin
Halim v. Gonzalespublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-12-15 · Published · cited 0× · 212 F. App'x 705
MEMORANDUM ** Mohammed Halim, and his wife, Ashiyana Halim, natives and citizens of Fiji, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their application for asylum, withholding of re*706moval, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under
District Court, S.D. California · 1998-07-01 · Published · cited 161× · 16 F. Supp. 2d 1192; 5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 475; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12603; 1998 WL 601451
16 F.Supp.2d 1192 (1998) Javier MORA, Plaintiff, v. CHEM-TRONICS, INC., Defendant. No. 97cv0851-J (JFS). United States District Court, S.D. California. July 1, 1998. *1193 *1194 *1195 *1196
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1997-10-30 · Published · cited 0× · 730 A.2d 1244; 1997 Del. Ch. LEXIS 151; 1997 WL 1110526
OPINION JACOBS, Vice Chancellor. Pending is the defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, or, in the alternative, to dismiss Count III of the Complaint for failure to make a demand. Because the Court grants the defendants’ motion to dismiss on personal jurisdiction grounds, it does not reach the demand question. The jurisdictional issue arises against the followi
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2023-12-13 · Published · cited 0×
Reverse and Remand and Opinion Filed December 13, 2023 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00997-CV PENNY L. YATES, Appellant V. WENDY HURTADO, Appellee On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dal
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019-03-19 · Published · cited 1× · 120 N.E.3d 1139
Kirsch, Judge. [1] Randy L. Thornton ("Thornton") appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Matthew Pietrzak ("Pietrzak"), Stephanie Buttz ("Buttz") (together, "Appellees"), Eric Lee ("Lee"), and Dianna Johnson ("Johnson"), who are all probation officers. 2 Thornton raises the following restated issue for
Montana Supreme Court · 1998-06-25 · Published · cited 71× · 1998 MT 164; 961 P.2d 1267; 289 Mont. 367; 55 State Rptr. 657; 1998 Mont. LEXIS 144
961 P.2d 1267 (1998) 1998 MT 164 Thomas Alan PARK, Petitioner, v. MONTANA SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARK COUNTY; Hon. Wm. Nels Swandal, Presiding Judge; and State of Montana, Respondents. No. 97-516. Supreme Court of Montana. Heard April 3, 1998. Submitted April 14, 1998. Decided June 25, 1998.
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2025-02-27 · Published · cited 0×
SECOND DIVISION MARKLE, LAND and DAVIS, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules February
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003-05-13 · Published · cited 22× · 2003 WI 37; 661 N.W.2d 27; 261 Wis. 2d 150; 2003 Wisc. LEXIS 405
DAVID T. PROSSER, J. ¶ 61. (concurring). This case raises troubling questions about our procedures for reviewing an applicant's request for admission to the Wisconsin bar. ¶ 62. Under SCR ch. 40, the Board of Bar Examiners screens each applicant. A candidate must satisfy the legal competence requirements set out in SCR 40.03, SCR 40.04, or SCR 40.05, and also satisfy the character and fitness requir
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2013-02-07 · Published · cited 9× · 83 Mass. App. Ct. 267; 982 N.E.2d 1215; 2013 Mass. App. LEXIS 21
Milkey, J. After a jury trial in Superior Court, the defendant was found guilty of rape aggravated by kidnapping, G. L. c. 265, *268§ 22(a); kidnapping aggravated by sexual assault, G. L. c. 265, § 26, third par.; and indecent assault and battery, G. L. c. 265, § 13H. The judge sentenced him on the aggravated rape and indecent assault and battery charges, and placed the i
District Court, S.D. New York · 1992-01-14 · Published · cited 6× · 782 F. Supp. 232; 17 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1176; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 312; 1992 WL 6499
782 F.Supp. 232 (1992) FIRST CITY NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Michael ZELLNER, Joseph Krader, Zellner Plastering Co., Inc., et al., James R. Wilcox, Defendants and Plaintiffs on Counterclaim, v. INTERDISCOUNT SERVICES, LTD., Tara Cole, First California Lessors Corp., and Gene Lobato, Defendants on Counterclaim. Nos. 87 Civ. 6081(RWS), 87 Civ. 6100(RWS), 87 Civ. 6102(RWS) and 87 Civ. 6353(RWS).