Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Tara Reilly”
PER CURIAM. Ten years ago, we revoked the respondent’s license to practice law. This matter comes before us on the respondent’s application for reinstatement of his license to practice law under Iowa Court Rule 34.25(9). We provisionally grant the respondent’s application for reinstatement of his law license subject to the conditions set forth in this opinion.
Reilly v. Dalypublic domain
666 N.E.2d 439 (1996) Therese B. REILLY, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Walter J. DALY, et al., Appellees-Defendants. No. 49A05-9509-CV-354. Court of Appeals of Indiana. June 7, 1996. Transfer Denied November 13, 1996. *441 Ronald E. Elberger, George T. Patton, Jr., William C. Ahrbecker, Bose McKinney & Evans, India
Gensey v. Taras DMDpublic domain
JOHNSON, J, I. INTRODUCTION Before the court for consideration is plaintiff’s complaint filed on April 17, 2009. Plaintiff’s complaint alleges statutory causes of action under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 Pa.C.S. §951, etseq. Anon-juiy trial was held on April 27 through 30, 2010. II. FINDINGS OF FACT (1) Individual defendant Michael Taras DMD (def
Feng Jin v. Reillypublic domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oliver, J.), dated August 2, 2001, which granted the respective motions of the defendants Richard C. Reilly, Jr., and Tara A. Reilly, and of Elizabeth G. Nast and Monica Piazza, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on *374the g
Ferris v. Location 3 Corp.public domain
BROWN, C.J. ¶ 1. Jason and Tara Ferris allege that Thomas Sauer, James Lechner, and Shan Mason conspired to lie on behalf of Location 3 Corporation in a real estate condition report, in violation of Wis. Stat. *159§§ 895.446 and 943.20(l)(d) (2009-10).'1 The defendants moved for partial summary judgment, arguing that the claim was barred by th
Kris Grice v. Katherine Reillypublic domain
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ July 27, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A17A2042. KRIS GRICE v. KATHERINE REILLY. On May 24, 2017, this Court granted Kris Grice’s application for discretionary appeal of the trial court’s order denying his motion for new trial on the granting of a three-year extension to a temporary protective ord
Amended November 8, 2016 Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Michael Gerard Reillypublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 05–1365 Filed September 2, 2016 Amended November 8, 2016 IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Complainant, vs. MICHAEL GERARD REILLY, Respondent. On review of the report of the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa. A former attorney whose license to practice law we previously revoked submitted an applicati
Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reillypublic domain
Justice Thomas, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. I join the opinion of the Court (with the exception of Part III — B—1) because I agree that the Massachusetts cigarette advertising regulations are pre-empted by the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act, 15 U. S. C. § 1831 et seq. I also agree with the Court’s disposition of the First Amendment challenges to the other regul
Jennifer Swain v. Estate of Shelley A. Tyre by and through James H. Reilly as Administrator d.b.n, c.t.a.public domain
OPINION Justice INDEGLIA, for the Court. Before this Court is a question of first impression. We are called upon to determine whether the Rhode Island Slayer’s Act, G.L.1956 chapter 1.1 of title 33 (Slayer’s Act, or Act), prohibits the testatrix’s stepchildren, Jennifer and Jeremy Swain (plaintiffs), from inheriting as named contingent testamentary beneficiaries (contingent beneficiaries) because this inh
United States v. Williamspublic domain
BAUM, Chief Judge: Appellant was tried by a special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was found guilty of one specification of unauthorized absence from July 2,1999 until January 13, 2000 in violation of Article 86 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), and one specification of missing movement by design in violation of Ar
MEMORANDUM OPINION T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge. This is an architectural works copyright infringement action. Plaintiff claims that defendants’ design and construction of the high-rise apartment building known as “Two Park Crest” in McLean, Virginia, infringes plaintiffs architectural works copyright embodied in a high-rise condominium building in Minneapolis, Minnesota, known as Grant Park. D
558 F.Supp.2d 273 (2008) SEARS PETROLEUM & TRANSPORT CORP., et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Civ. Action No. 5:03-CV-1120 (DEP). United States District Court, N.D. New York. May 20, 2008. *276 Lathrop, Gage Law Firm, William R. Hansen, Esq., Bernadette Reilly, Esq., of Counsel, Duane,
Ackley v. Gulf Oil Corp.public domain
726 F.Supp. 353 (1989) Frank ACKLEY d/b/a Village Square Chevron, et al. v. GULF OIL CORPORATION, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and Cumberland Farms, Inc. ROBERT A. COHN/R.A.C. CAR SERVICE, INC. v. GULF OIL CORPORATION, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., and Cumberland Farms, Inc. Civ. Nos. B-86-402 (EBB), B-87-370 (EBB) and B-87-716 (EBB). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. M
769 F.Supp.2d 997 (2011) TECSEC, INC. Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP., et al., Defendants. No. 1:10CV115 (LMB/TCB). United States District Court, E.D. Virginia. March 3, 2011. *1000 Brian Mark Buroker, Michael Andrew Oakes, Hunton & Williams, Washington, DC, Stephen Michael Sayers, Thomas J. Cawley, Hunton
Swift v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
637 F.Supp. 125 (1986) Johnny SWIFT, Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. Civ. No. 86-CV-70614-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D. June 11, 1986. Taras P. Jarema, Dennis J. Simon & Associates, P.C., Southfield, Mich., for plaintiff. Michael J. O'Reilly, Dearborn, Mich., for defendant. MEMOR
Liguori v. Yergerpublic domain
Liguori v Yerger (2021 NY Slip Op 04911) Liguori v Yerger 2021 NY Slip Op 04911 Decided on September 1, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L
763 F.Supp.2d 800 (2011) TECSEC, INC., Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP., et al., Defendants. No. 1:10cv115 (LMB/TCB). United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. January 12, 2011. *802 Brian Mark Buroker, Michael Andrew Oakes, Hunton & Williams LLP, Washington, DC, Stephen Michael Saye
Washington, Senior Judge: *91 This case stems from the collapse of a portion of the roadway at the intersection of 14th and F Streets, N.W., which damaged a sewer main and other underground utilities beneath the intersection. After repairing the damage, appellee District of Columbia Water and S
Sweat v. Butlerpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS BY DEFENDANT, CITY OF CRUMP, TENNESSEE J. DANIEL BREEN, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs, Tara Sweat and Jeremy Hunter Sweat, brought this action against the City of Crump, Tennessee, and Larry Butler, a former Crump police officer, in a complaint filed on September 26, 2014, alleging violations of 42' U.S.C. § 1983 and Tennessee tort law. (Docket Entry ! (“D.E.”) 1.) Before the Co
Clay Woerner v. Emory Children's Center, Inc.public domain
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ March 05, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A17A1671. CLAY WOERNER et al. v. EMORY CHILDREN’S CENTER, INC. et al. Clay and Deborah Woerner seek to appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their complaint for declaratory relief seeking to prevent the production of their son’s medical records in a contribu