Cases

MOORE, Judge. Roxanne Michelle Tanner ("the mother") appeals from judgments entered by the Mobile Circuit Court ("the trial court") that, among other things, require her visitation with her son, M.C.T. ("the son"), to be supervised, denied her request to modify her child-support obligation to Justin Clay Tanner ("the father"), and ordered her to pay a portion of the fees of the son's guardian ad litem. We affirm the judgments in par

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge, dissenting. “If the court finds that either parent is voluntarily unemployed or underemployed, it shall estimate the income that parent would otherwise have and shall impute to that parent that income .... ” Rule 32(B)(5), Ala. R. Jud. Admin. “This court, noting that the language of Rule 32 is mandatory, has held that where a trial court finds a parent to be voluntarily unemployed o

STROUD, Judge. Appellant Sara Tanner appeals from an order, entered 12 January 2015, imposing a constructive trust upon her funds for the benefit of the marital estate of plaintiff and defendant Mary Margaret Tanner. All parties to the appeal agree that Appellant was properly joined as a necessary party, but because Appellant had not been joined as a party prior to the hearing and order

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge I,Julissa and Richard Tanner were divorced by decree entered on May 20, 2014. The trial court awarded custody of their three minor children to Richard and ordered one weekend a month of supervised visitation to Julissa. Julissa appeals, challenging the trial court’s decisions regarding supervised visitation, an evidentiary ruling, a

MOORE, Judge. In appeal no. 2120047, Jeremy T. Tanner (“the husband”) appeals from the denial of his motion to “set aside” a judgment of divorce, entered by the Mobile Circuit Court (“the trial court”), divorcing him from Erica D. Tanner (“the wife”). In appeal no. 2120303, the husband appeals from a judgment entered by the trial court denying his objection to the wife’s relocation with the parties’ children.1

256 P.3d 1099 (2011) 243 Or. App. 389 COX-TANNER v. TANNER. A145125 Court of Appeals of Oregon. June 8, 2011. Affirmed without opinion.

975 So.2d 1190 (2008) David Warrens TANNER, Former Husband, Appellant, v. Maria Baeza TANNER, Former Wife, Appellee. No. 1D07-4962. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. March 6, 2008. Bryan S. Gowdy and John S. Mills of Mills & Creed, Jacksonville; Jeanine B. Sasser, Jacksonville, for Appellant. Diana S. Farhat, Jacksonville, and James J.

956 So.2d 1106 (2007) Sheila TANNER, Appellant v. Windell Ray TANNER, Appellee. No. 2006-CA-00423-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. May 22, 2007. *1107 Stanley Alex Sorey, Raleigh, attorney for appellant. Daniel Dewayne Ware, Magee, attorney for appellee. Before LEE, P.J., BARNES and CARLTON, JJ. LEE, P.J

Mercure, J.P. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Delaware County (Becker, J.), entered January 12, 2006, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, for visitation with the parties’ child. The parties are the parents of Lucas (born in 1999). They resided together with the child until he was approximately three years old. Since that time, the child ha

PER CURIAM. Appellee concedes the trial judge erred by including a provision in the Amended Final Judgment of Dissolution, not requested by the parties, that terminates the former wife’s entitlement to periodic alimony upon remarriage or cohabitation, whichever comes first. See Bridges v. Bridges, 842 So.2d 983, 984 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)(agreeing that Florida law does not recognize cohabitation as a basis for automatic

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 421 OPINION William P. Tanner III appeals a judgment awarding Georgia L. Tanner $120,867.10 in costs and attorney fees. He challenges the trial court's interpretation of a marital settlement agreement (MSA) provision and the amount of attorney fees awarded. *Page 42

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-23-00268-CV Valeria Indira Tanner, Appellant v. Derrick Thedell Tanner, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 22-0539-FC4, THE HONORABLE JOHN MCMASTER, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 11, 2025 NO. 03-23-00268-CV Valeria Indira Tanner, Appellant v. Derrick Thedell Tanner, Appellee APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, KELLY AND CRUMP

[Cite as Tanner v. Carmichael, 2025-Ohio-4501.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) DERRYL TANNER C.A. No. 24CA012167 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE EBONY CARMI

[Cite as State v. Tanner, 2025-Ohio-2087.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellee : C.A. No. 30264 : v.

320 Ga. 557 FINAL COPY S24A1076. TANNER v. THE STATE. BOGGS, Chief Justice. Appellant Dewayne David Tanner challenges the trial court’s dismissal of his 2024 motion to withdraw his 2017 guilty pleas to malice murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting death of his wife, Stephanie Tanner, and the non-fatal shooting of his mother-in-law, Beverly Broach. The trial court properly dismissed Appellant’s motion as untimely, and we therefore affirm. I

[Cite as Tanner v. Robinson, 2025-Ohio-1938.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Jose Tanner, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 24AP-405 v. : (C.P.C. No. 23JU-9973) Briana Robinson, :

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA24-166 Filed 15 October 2024 Guilford County, No. 21 CRS 79319 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MILAN DION TANNER. Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 5 June 2023 by Judge Lora C. Cubbage in Guilford County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 11 September 2024. Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Assistant Attorney Gener

[Cite as State v. Tanner, 2024-Ohio-988.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES: : : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. W. Sco

[Cite as State v. Tanner, 2022-Ohio-4224.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : CASE NO. CA2021-12-167 Appellee, : OPINION 11/28/2022