Cases

537 F.3d 1100 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kendall TANKERSLEY, aka Sarah Kendall Harvey; Kendall, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-30334. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 5, 2008. Filed August 12, 2008. *1102 Gail K. Johnson, Smith and West, LLC, Denver

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 07-30334 v.  D.C. No. CR-06-60071-ALA KENDALL TANKERSLEY, aka Sarah Kendall Harvey; Kendall, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from th

277 F.Supp.2d 908 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, v. William H. TANKERSLEY, Defendant. No. 2:01-CR-122AS. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. August 18, 2003. *909 Stephen C. Bower, James N. Thiros, Nick J. Thiros, Alison L. Benjamin, Cohen and Thiros, Merrillville, IN, for defendant.

ORDER William Tankersley masterminded a scheme of false advertising and solicitation directed at persons interested in United States Postal Service jobs. On July 19, 2001, Tankersley was indicted on one conspiracy count, sixteen counts of wire fraud, ten counts of mail fraud, twenty-nine counts of money laundering, three counts of filing false tax returns, and one count of forfeiture. Tankersley claimed double jeopardy and moved to dism

269 F.Supp.2d 1178 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Amanda K. TANKERSLEY, Defendant. No. 4:03CR3000. United States District Court, D. Nebraska. June 5, 2003. *1180 Alan L. Everett, Assistant United States Attorney, Lincoln, NE, for Plaintiff. John C. Vanderslice, Federal Public Defender's Office-Lincoln, Linc

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 01-3425 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIAM H. TANKERSLEY, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District o

Per Curiam: Plaintiff seeks to recover additional costs allegedly incurred in tbe performance of a contract with the Department of the Navy, acting through the Bureau of Yards and Docks, under which plaintiff, for the sum of $3,408,713, agreed to furnish the materials and perform the work for the construction of 60 ammunition storage magazines, roads, railroads, and extensions to water and fire alarm systems at the Naval Ammuniti

KANNE, Circuit Judge. William H. Tankersley pled guilty to two counts of criminal contempt of court. On appeal, Tankersley argues that the district court erroneously declined to reduce his sentence by two levels for acceptance of responsibility; that the district court erred when it enhanced his sentence for substantially interfering with the administration of justice; and that

BEAM, Circuit Judge. Amanda Tankersley appeals her conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The issue on appeal is whether Tankersley’s underlying burglary conviction is an adequate predicate offense for the felon-in-possession charge. We find that it is, and affirm the district court. 1

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-3799 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the

382 B.R. 522 (2008) In re Richie Adele TANKERSLEY, Debtor. David C. Seitter, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Anne Wedow, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05-26151. Adversary No. 07-06111. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas. February 13, 2008. *523 Adam M. Laboda, Spencer Fane Britt & Browne LLP, Kansas City, MO, for Plai

636 F.2d 1228 U. S.v.Tankersley 80-1207 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 12/11/80 1 N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

*851MEMORANDUM OPINION Phyllis M. Jones, United States Bankruptcy Judge Before the Court is the Objection to Exemptions Claimed by Debtors [Doc. No. 89] (“Objection”) filed on July 7, 2016, by M. Randy Rice, the duly appointed Chapter 7 Trustee (“Trustee”). The Trustee raises three objections to the exemptions claimed by the Debtors, Bobby “B

546 F.2d 425 U. S.v.Tankersley No. 76-1801 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit 11/9/76 1 E.D.Ky. AFFIRMED

*261 POSNER, Circuit Judge. The Federal Trade Commission brought suit against William Tankersley (and corporations controlled by him, but we can ignore that detail) seeking relief against a wide-ranging, nationwide scheme to defraud persons seeking employment by the Postal Service of millions of dollars i

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 16, 2018 No. 04-18-00211-CV Nancy L. TANKERSLEY and Charlie R. Tankersley, Appellants v. TRIPLE I. RANCHES, A Texas Partnership,

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING joined. Senior Judge DAVIS wrote an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. DIAZ, Circuit Judge: All attorneys licensed in Maryland who are not permanently retired must pay an annual fee to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland. In addition to paying the fee, Maryland attorneys must also disclose their

Debra M. Brown, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This criminal case is before the Court on Javier Alejandro Moline-Borroto's motion to suppress, Doc. # 64; which was joined by Daniel Gustavo Pena-Morales, Doc. # 65; Valentine Sybreg Castro-Balza, Doc. # 68; Pavel Isaac Burgos-Coronado, Doc. # 69; Kevin Carlos Delgado-Mata, Doc. # 71; Joseph Nicole Vergara-Moran, Doc. # 72; and Cesar Augusto Salemi-Nicoloso, Doc. # 86. <

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge. Plaintiff Michael Tankersley (“Mr. Tankersley” or “Plaintiff’) brings this action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against Defendants Michael Almand, et al.1 (“Defendants”), alleging violations of Section 7 of the Federal Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and the Supremacy Clause of the Unit

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 7, 2019 No. 04-18-00211-CV Nancy L. TANKERSLEY and Charlie R. Tankersley, Appellants v. TRIPLE I. RANCHES, A Texas Partnership,