Cases

HUNTER, JR., Robert N. Judge. *824 Tanglewood Property Owners' Association, Inc. ("Plaintiff") appeals an 11 February 2015 order denying Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and a 7 March 2016 judgment. Plaintiff also appeals a 23 August 2016 order denying Plaintiff's motion for judgment

STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT — ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION } In re 49 Tanglewood Final Plan Approval } Docket No. 76-6-12 Vtec } Decision on Motion for Summary Judgment This acrimonious dispute essentially revolves around one issue: whether a proposed subdivision r

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SELENA E. MOLINA LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER SENIOR MAGISTRATE IN CHANCERY 500 NORTH KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DE 19801-3734

OPINION 1 J. BRETT BUSBY, Justice. These consolidated appeals arise out of a protracted dispute between Stewart and Marla Feldman and Tanglewood Homes Association, Inc. over the Feldmans’ desire to expand their home. When the Association rejected the Feldmans’ expansion plans as a violation of the Tangl

AFFIRM in Part, and REVERSE and REMAND in Part; Opinion Filed May 21, 2019. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01096-CV BCH DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Appellant V. LAKEVIEW HEIGHTS ADDITION PROPERTY OWNERS' AS

OPINION Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice This appeal concerns the validity and enforceability of a property restriction— specifically a one-foot reserve strip (“the Non-Access Easement”)—that if valid precludes ingress and egress across the strip. This court has previously reviewed this dispute, holding that neither side was entitled'to summary judgment and remanding to the trial cou

IQVIA, Inc. v. Cir. Clinical Sols., Inc., 2023 NCBC 1. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION WAKE COUNTY 22 CVS 7425 IQVIA, INC., Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON MOTION TO DISMISS CIRCUIT CLINICAL SOLUTIONS, INC.,

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 14-3050 _____________ CRYSTAL BYRD; BRIAN BYRD, Individually, and on Behalf of all Similarly Situated Persons, Appellants v. AARON’S INC; ASPEN WAY ENTERPRISES INC, d/b/a Aaron’s Sales and Leasing, A Franchisee of

728 S.W.2d 39 (1987) TANGLEWOOD HOMES ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Appellants, v. Charles L. and Sally HENKE, Appellees. No. 01-86-00024-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). January 22, 1987. Rehearing Denied March 12, 1987. *40 Eugene M. Nettles Scott, Douglass & Luton, Ronald M. Chamberlain, Jr

Order Granting Motion to Dismiss JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge. In the years following Las Vegas’s real estate crash, lenders and investors were at loggerheads over the legal effect of a homeowners association’s (HOA’s) nonjudicial foreclosure of a superpriority lien on a lender’s first trust deed. The Nevada Supreme Court settled the debate last September in SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-445 No. COA21-366 Filed 5 July 2022 New Hanover County, No. 19-CVS-1668 CAPE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., DESMOND P. MCHUGH and wife, GERALDINE MCHUGH, MICHAEL L. BODNAR and wife, PATRICIA L. BODNAR, BRUCE ANDERSON and wife, ARLENE ANDERSON, DONNA J. MARTIN and spouse, PETER MARTIN

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-445 No. COA21-366 Filed 5 July 2022 New Hanover County, No. 19-CVS-1668 CAPE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., DESMOND P. MCHUGH and wife, GERALDINE MCHUGH, MICHAEL L. BODNAR and wife, PATRICIA L. BODNAR, BRUCE ANDERSON and wife, ARLENE ANDERSON, DONNA J. MARTIN and spouse, PETER MARTIN

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00177-CV ___________________________ HICKS AIRFIELD PILOTS ASSOCIATION, Appellant V. BARBARA ANN BRUNSON; KEVIN BRUNSON; RIO CONCHO AVIATION, INC.; SOUTHLAKE HOSPITALITY, INC. D/B/A WING IT CAFÉ!; AND BARB

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

BROCK, Justice. We note first that this contract was executed in Virginia, and that the interpretation of a contract is governed by the law of the place where the contract was made. Bundy v. Commercial Credit Corporation, 200 N.C. 511, 516, 157 S.E. 860, 863 (1931); Fast v. Gulley, 271 N.C. 208, 155 S.E. 2d 507 (1967). Secondly, the contract on its face provides that in construing the contract the laws of the

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT April 24, 2015 No. 14-3050 CRYSTAL BYRD; BRIAN BYRD, Individually, and on Behalf of all Similarly Situated Persons, Appellants v. AARON'S INC; ASPEN WAY ENTERPRISES INC, d/b/a Aaron

*423 Dooley, J. ¶ 1. Plaintiff Birchwood Land Company (“Birch-wood”) appeals the decision of the Superior Court, Grand Isle Unit denying Birchwood’s motion for attachment and granting defendant Judith Krizan’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Birchwood’s complaint alleged that Erizan was unjus

Value Health Sols. Inc. v. Pharm. Research Assocs., Inc., 2019 NCBC 68. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 18-CV-12318 VALUE HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC. and NAGARAJAN PARTHASARATHY, Plaintiffs, ORDER AND OPINION ON v. PLAINTIFF

Dooley, J. ¶ 1. This appeal involves a dispute between developer, Birchwood Land Company, Inc., and contractor, Ormond Bushey & Sons, Inc., arising out of a construction contract. Developer sued for breach of contract, claiming mainly that contractor had removed excavated sand from the construction site without permission. Contractor counterclaimed for amounts due under the cont

ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Judge. I,Appellee SEECO, Inc. (“SEECO”), was granted a directed verdict in a negligence case brought against it by appellants, Freddie and Gail Sammons and Paul and Alice Tygart, in Yell County Circuit Court. On appeal, appellants contend that the trial court erred in granting the directed verdict because they had established a prima facie case of negligence and res ipsa loquitur applied.