Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
13 opinions for “Tang v. Sawyer Gas”
Weiss v. Sawyerpublic domain
28 F.Supp.2d 1221 (1997) Doris Irene WEISS, Plaintiff, v. K.J. SAWYER, et al., Defendants. No. CIV-96-2034-R. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. September 19, 1997. *1222 *1223 *1224 Doris Irene Weiss, Harrah, OK, pro se. Donald N. Downie,
Harrod v. Statepublic domain
Angelo Reno Harrod v. State of Maryland, Nos. 7 & 8, September Term, 2023. Opinion by Tang, J. CRIMINAL LAW – EVIDENCE – FACTS IN ISSUE AND RELEVANCE – SUBSEQUENT CONDITION OR CONDUCT OF ACCUSED – IN GENERAL Evidence of defendant’s attempted flight and analogous conduct during apprehension was relevant as evidence of consciousness of guilt; it tended to show that he wanted to evade capture and prevent evidence linking him to the shooting from being recovered. CRIMINAL LAW – EVIDENCE – FACTS I
Harrod v. Statepublic domain
Angelo Reno Harrod v. State of Maryland, Nos. 7 & 8, September Term, 2023. Opinion by Tang, J. CRIMINAL LAW – EVIDENCE – FACTS IN ISSUE AND RELEVANCE – SUBSEQUENT CONDITION OR CONDUCT OF ACCUSED – IN GENERAL Evidence of defendant’s attempted flight and analogous conduct during apprehension was relevant as evidence of consciousness of guilt; it tended to show that he wanted to evade capture and prevent evidence linking him to the shooting from being recovered. CRIMINAL LAW – EVIDENCE – FACTS I
Oregon Restaurant and Lodging v. Thomas Perezpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OREGON RESTAURANT AND No. 13-35765 LODGING ASSOCIATION, a non-profit Oregon corporation; WASHINGTON D.C. No. RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION, a non- 3:12-cv-01261- profit Washington corporation; MO ALASKA CABARET, HOTEL, RESTAURANT & RETAILERS ASSOCIATION, a non-profit Alaska corporation; NATIONAL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION, a non- profit Illinois
Mayor and City Council of Balt v. Alex Azar, IIpublic domain
ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1614 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Health and Human Services; DIANE FOLEY, M.D.,
107 F.3d 1328 65 USLW 2577, 25 Media L. Rep. 1363,97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1307,97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1925 VALLEY BROADCASTING COMPANY, dba KVBC (TV), Channel 13, LasVegas, NV; Sierra Broadcasting Company, dba KRNV(TV), Channel 4, Reno, NV, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.UNITED STATES of America; Federal CommunicationsCommission, Defendants-Appellants. No. 93-16191.
Graham v. Hall-McMillen Co., Inc.public domain
925 F.Supp. 437 (1996) Elmer M. GRAHAM, Plaintiffs, v. HALL-McMILLEN COMPANY, INC., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:94CV116-D-A. United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Western Division. May 9, 1996. *438 Jim M. Greenlee, Assistant United States Attorney, Oxford, Mississippi, Channah S. Broyde, United States Department of
East Texas Medical Center Gilmer v. Birder Porterpublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM
714 F.Supp. 1084 (1989) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Roderick STILLWELL; and Roderick Stillwell, in his own right, Plaintiffs, v. HUGHES HELICOPTERS, INC.; McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Co.; Parker Hannifin Corp.; Edward E. Vukonich; James P. Coyne; and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. No. CV 87-1840-WDK. United States District Court, C.D. California. June 1, 1989.<
In re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigationpublic domain
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction and Procedural Background ...................................971 II. The Federal Arbitration Act 973 *971III. Waiver of the Right to Arbitrate.........
Mildner v. Gulottapublic domain
WEINSTEIN, District Judge (dissenting). Despite my high regard for New York’s tradition in maintaining the high ethical standards of its bar, I reluctantly conclude that its disciplinary procedure is constitutionally infirm in denying attorneys the due process and equal protection guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. There is no inconsistency between fair treatment of lawyer
07/01/2002 Case Announcementspublic domain
[Cite as 07/01/2002 Case Announcements, 2002-Ohio-3343.] The Supreme Court of Ohio CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS July 1, 2002 DISCIPLINARY CASES 2001-0412. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary. Patricia A. Cleary is reinstated to the practice of law. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 2002-0902. Butcher v. Lewis. Stark App. No. 2001CA00219, 2002-Ohi
Laaman v. Helgemoepublic domain
437 F.Supp. 269 (1977) Jaan LAAMAN et al. v. Raymond A. HELGEMOE, Warden New Hampshire State Prison, et al. Civ. A. No. 75-258. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. July 1, 1977. *270 *271 *272 *273