Cases

Order entered October 8, 2015 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00889-CV JAGADISH BALACHANDRACHARI, Appellant V. THERESA KIM-HOA TANG, Appellee On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Reversed and Remanded; Opinion Filed July 22, 2016. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00889-CV JAGADISH BALACHANDRACHARI, Appellant V. THERESA KIM-HOA TANG, THE

Order entered December 29, 2015 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00889-CV JAGADISH BALACHANDRACHARI, Appellant V. THERESA KIM-HOA TANG AND THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, Appellees On Appea

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered September 21, 2000, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiffs’ motion to remove the action from Civil Court to Supreme Court and amend the complaint so as to increase the ad damnum clause from $25,000 to $1 million, unanimously affirmed, without costs. The motion was properly denied for lack of a recent medical affidavit setting forth th

Filed 3/18/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, D084192 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. SCD155370) KIM H. TANG, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego Coun

In an action, inter alia, pursuant to Administrative Code of the City of New York § 8-107 (7) to recover damages for retaliation, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated May 22, 2007, as granted the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the amended complaint. Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the def

OPINION OF THE COURT Lawrence Knipel, J. *704Plaintiff moves to vacate a judgment of this court entered October 10, 2006, which, upon a short form order dated September 6, 2006, granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint upon plaintiff’s default in appearing for oral argument, dismissed the amended complaint. The

WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge. We review the petition of Zi Zhi Tang (“Tang”), a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China. Tang filed an application for asylum and withholding of removal, alleging that the abortion performed on his wife, Li Zhen Tang (“Li Zhen”), constituted persecution by the Chinese government as a forced abortion under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42

E-FILED CNMI SUPREME COURT E-filed: Nov 21 2025 10:48AM Clerk Review: Nov 21 2025 10:48AM Filing ID: 77836717 Case No.: 2023-SCC-0013-CIV

15-131(L) United States v. Tang Yuk et al. 15-131(L) United States v. Tang Yuk et al. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term, 2016 (Argued: September 27, 2016 Decided: March 15, 2018)

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Tang (Janny) Nguyen and five others were charged with various offenses after they imported from Vietnam and sold in Nebraska thousands of cigarettes without paying pertinent federal, state, and local taxes. The most culpable defendants pleaded guilty and agreed to cooperate. The case went to trial against Ms. Nguyen and a codefendant, who was acquitted by

Susan L. Carney, Circuit Judge: Three defendants found by a jury to have engaged in a criminal conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine challenge their convictions, contending that venue did not properly lie in the Southern District of New York, the place of their prosecutions. We consider whether, although the bulk of their joint criminal activity took place in the U.S. Virgin Islands and in Florida,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ZI ZHI TANG,  Petitioner, No. 04-70804 v.  Agency No. A71-565-867 ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an

ORDER ON RULE 29(C) AND RULE 33 MOTIONS JOHN M. GERRARD, District Judge. The defendant has filed two post-verdict motions: a motion for judgment of acquittal pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 29(c), and a motion for new trial pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 33. (Filing 186) For the reasons explained below, the Court will deny both motions. RULE 29(C) MOTION On a motion for

18 Ariz. App. 40 (1972) 499 P.2d 991 The VALLEY NATIONAL BANK of Arizona, a corporation, Appellant, v. Kim S. TANG et al., Appellees. No. 1 CA-CIV 1628. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. July 27, 1972. Rehearing Denied September 11, 1972. Review Denied November 21, 1972. Rawlins, Ellis, B

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Sansoogapsan II, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Butler, J.), dated November 16, 2012, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) to vacate an order of the same court dated August 1, 2012, granting that branch of the plaintiffs’ unopposed motion which was for leave to enter a default judgment against it upon its failure to appear or answe

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Sansoogapsan II, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Butler, J.), dated November 16, 2012, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) to vacate an order of the same court dated August 1, 2012, granting that branch of the plaintiffs’ unopposed motion which was for leave to enter a default judgment against it upon its failure to appear or answe

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge: Kim King (King) and Kent Norman (Norman) appeal pro se the district court’s dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 class action against the Governor of Oregon, the Attorney General of Oregon, and the Superintendent of the Oregon State Hospital. They contend that the district court erred in ignoring their original complaint after they filed an amen

*1217 HUG, Circuit Judge: The Government appeals the district court’s order granting defendant Ching Tang Lo’s motion for acquittals on a charge of possessing ephedrine, a listed chemical used to manufacture methamphetamine, and a related money laundering charge. Lo contends that this court does not ha

FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge: Yu Tang and nine other citizens of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), all of whom entered the United States without inspection, appeal the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the United States Attorney General and others.1 Tang challenges the promulgation and enforcement of 8 C.F.R. § 245.9(b)(6). She asserts that it violates the Chinese Student Protection