Cases

218 P.3d 358 (2009) Anthony LOBATO, as an individual and as parent and natural guardian of Taylor Lobato and Alexa Lobato; Denise Lobato, as an individual and as parent and natural guardian of Taylor Lobato and Alexa Lobato; Jaime Hurtado and Coralee Hurtado, as individuals and as parents and natural guardians of Maria Hurtado and Evan Hurtado; Janet L. Kuntz, as an individual and as parent and natural guardian of Daniel Kuntz and Stacey Kuntz; Pantaleon

JUSTICE COATS, concurring in the judgment only. 35 While I too believe the court of appeals misconstrued the Act in finding that it declines waiver of governmental immunity for all parking facilities, as a general category or class, and while I would similarly reverse the judgment below, I nevertheless take issue with the majority's understanding of the "park or recreation area" waiver of the statute. In pa

JUSTICE HOOD delivered the judgment of the Court. {1 In this case, we address whether the government waived its immunity for injuries petitioner Sara Burnett sustained when a tree limb fell on her as she camped below in a designated campsite in Cherry Creek State Park. The answer turns on whether the tree was a "natural condition of ... unimproved property" under section 24-10-106(1)(e), C.R.S. (2014), of

OPINION TALLMAN, Circuit Judge: We must once again address the subject of tribal court jurisdiction over disputes arising when non-Indians choose to do business in Indian country. Underlying this jurisdictional question is a multi-mil-lion dollar development contract involving the building and operation of a tourist destination overlooking one of the wor

Filed 6/5/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, D076384 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. JCF33890) ARTEMIS WHALUM, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of

Filed 2/26/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2013 ND 24 Gayln L. Olson, Bradley L. Nelson, Rebecca L. Harstad, Keith Abrahamson, Joann Allard, Deborah A. Ambuehl, Gertrude E. Anderson, Ro

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. This is a case in which the Attorney General for the State of New Mexico (AG) seeks unrestricted money damages exclusively under state law for groundwater contamination in Albuquerque’s South Valley. The district court granted summary judgment to Defendants General Electric (GE) and ACF Industries (ACF) because the AG “failed to raise genuine issues of ma

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, District Judge. ' Plaintiff and Defendants each bring motions for summary judgment in this Title VII employment discrimination action. Plaintiff moves for partial summary judgment as it relates to the definition of “employer” under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Specifically, Plainti

335 F.Supp.2d 1185 (2004) State of NEW MEXICO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Nos. CIV 99-1118 BSJ/KBM, CIV 99-1254 BSJ/ACT (Consolidated). United States District Court, D. New Mexico. April 6, 2004. *1186 *1187 *1188 <

KAPSNER, Justice. [¶ 1] Claimants appeal a district court judgment affirming Job Service North Dakota’s decision denying them unemployment benefits. Because the plain language of N.D.C.C. § 52-06-02(4) only disqualifies claimants from unemployment compensation for employee initiated work stoppages due to a labor dispute, it does not apply to the locked out Claimants. We reverse the district court’s judgment affirming Job Service

FILED IN NO. 13-212 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/11/15 11:24:40 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk TAMI L. WOLE'F, C.S.R. PHONE: (830) 331-8286 NO. 13-212 ROBERTSON ELECTRIC, INC. ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) VS . ) 216TH JUD

ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS