Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ELAINE E. BUCKLO, District Judge. Plaintiff Original Creations, Inc. (“OCI”) sued Life + Gear, Inc.1 (“Life + Gear”) alleging a claim of patent infringement under Title 35 of the United States Code. Specifically, OCI contends that Life + Gear commits infringement of its patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(a)-(c). Life + Gear seeks to dism

OPINION AND ORDER Joan H. Lefkow, United States District Judge On May 12,' 2015, Monster Energy Company (MEC) filed suit against Chinese entities that have offered counterfeit Monster Energy prodúcts for sale online (“defendants”)1 alleging trademark counterfeiting and copyright infringement. (Dkt. 1.) MEC’s five-count second amended complaint brings claims for (1)

799 F.Supp.2d 871 (2011) TECHNOLINES, LP and Echelon Laser Systems, LP, Plaintiffs, v. GST AUTOLEATHER, INC., Defendant. No. 11 C 965. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 30, 2011. *872 Cameron Matthew Nelson, Mark R. Galis, Matthew Joshua Levinstein, Kevin John O'Shea, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Chic

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge. This case illustrates some of the practical difficulties in implementing three of the principles intended to reduce the burden of discovery generally, and electronic discovery in particular: phasing, sampling, and proportionality. In this putative class action, the plaintiffs allege that their employers, Goldman, Sachs &am;

REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, United States District Judge *870MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs CS Wang & Associate, Sat Narayan d.b.a. Express Hauling, Robert Meyer d.b.a. Mangia Nosh, and Taysir Tayeh d.b.a. Chief's Market are all small businesses located in California. The Plaintiffs launched this putative class