Cases

Dillard, Chief Judge. In 2010, Governor Sonny Perdue ordered a special investigation into the nearly decade-long suspicions that administrators, principals, and teachers in the Atlanta Public Schools System (“APS”) had engaged in widespread cheating on standardized tests used to assess the progress of elementary and middle-school students in Georgia. After the conclusion of that i

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

764 A.2d 844 (2000) 136 Md. App. 236 In re TAMARA R. No. 275, Sept. Term, 2000. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. December 29, 2000. *845 Seri A. Wilpone, Hughesville, for appellant. Mary M. Pizzo, Asst. Public Defender (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender, on brief), Baltimore, for appellee. Argu

103 F.Supp.2d 1124 (2000) ESTATE OF Tamara COOPER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MILWAUKEE COUNTY, et al., Defendants. No. 99-C-1054. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. July 14, 2000. Bettie A. Rodgers, Law Offices of Bettie Rodgers & Associates, Shorewood, WI, Lawrence G. Albrecht, First Blondis Albrecht Bangert & Novotnak, Milwaukee, WI, for plaintiffs

261 S.W.3d 811 (2008) Larry RAMSEY, Appellant, v. Jeffrey L. DAVIS and Tamara M. Davis, Appellees. No. 05-07-00327-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. August 11, 2008. Rehearing Overruled September 19, 2008. *813 John M. Gillis, Dallas, TX, for Appellant. Marc R. May, Gay, McCall, Isaacks, Gordon &

SELYA, Circuit Judge. Music is an international language that has the capacity to bring together people from every corner of the world. It is also an economic engine, capable of yielding financial gain to those who own and control it. This appeal, which involves a controversy over the authorship of a hit song, exposes us to that coarser side of the music industry.

JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Manisha Palla ("Plaintiff") sued Defendants L M Sports, L T Leasing, and Paul Garcia for negligence following an accident on Lake Tahoe that resulted in the amputation of her right leg. L M Sports and L T Leasing (collectively "Defendants") filed a limitation of liability action under

Daniel R. Borcheet, Deputy Clerk. {¶ 1} On March 8, 2003, plaintiff, Tamara L. Shupe, was driving her van south on State Route 99 between Monroeville and Willard, near a location identified as “Conservation Club,” when a tree limb fell upon her vehicle, causing substantial property damage. Plaintiff filed this complaint seeking to recover $1,000, her insurance coverage deductible for automotive repair. Plaintiff submitted the fi

557 F.3d 746 (2009) James D. SHALES, John Pavlak, and Tamara L. Smith, Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL CHAUFFEURS, SALES DRIVERS AND HELPERS LOCAL UNION NO. 330, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal of James Gordon Banks. No. 07-3342. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 22, 2008. Decided February 27, 2009.

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

ACCEPTED 04-12-00630-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

Tom Glaze, Justice. Tamara and David Bankston were divorced on December 27, 1985, and the couple’s two minor daughters were awarded to Tamara. David was ordered to pay Tamara $220 per month child support, plus two-thirds of the health insurance premiums for the children, and reimbursement of one-half of the dental and non-covered medical expenses incurred on the children’s behalf. Over the years, David f

OPINION By the Court, Parraguirre, J.: In this appeal, the beneficiary of a will challenges a district court order invalidating the will as the product of the beneficiary’s undue influence. A rebuttable presumption of undue influence is raised if the testator and the beneficiary shared a fiduciary relationship, but undue influence may also be proved without raising this presumption

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. This case comprises appeals by both sides — the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (“the IRS”) and the taxpayers Gordon and Lorna Kaufman — from a decision of the Tax Court. The subject is deductions on the couple’s joint returns of the asserted value of Lorna Kaufman’s donation to the National Architectural Trust of a fagade easement restricting alterations o

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

OPINION Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice In the underlying lawsuit, appellee, Longview Energy Company (“Longview”), sued two of its directors and others for, among other claims, breach, of fiduciary duty by taking a corporate opportunity that belonged to Longview., Following a jury trial, several liability questions were submitted to the jury. The two liability questions addr

EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge: In 1995, J. Howard Marshall, II (“J. Howard”) made what the IRS later determined was an indirect gift of Marshall Petroleum, Inc. (“MPI”) stock to MPI’s other shareholders: (1) Eleanor Pierce (Marshall) Stevens (“Stevens”), J. How'ard’s former wife, who was the beneficiary of a trust that was funded by MPI stock; (2) E. Pierce Marshall (“E. Pierce”), J. Howard’s son; (3) Elaine T. Marshall (“Ela

702 N.W.2d 792 (2005) 270 Neb. 370 Ivan EICHER and Delores Eicher et al., appellees and cross-appellants, v. MID AMERICA FINANCIAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION et al., appellants and cross-appellees. Ivan Eicher and Delores Eicher et al., appellees, v. Mid America Financial Investment Corporation et al., appellants. Nos. S-03-1257, S-04-1184. Supreme Court of Nebraska.