Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Tailored Brands, Inc.”
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 21, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00328-CV KENNETH SAWYER, ANAYA DUBROIS-LATTIMER, AND COURTNEY JONES, Appellants V. THE MEN’S WEARHOUSE, TAILORED BRANDS, INC., TAILORED SHARED SERVICES, LLC, TAILORED BRANDS PURCHASING, LLC, JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC., AND TWIN
Morrison v. Eminence Capital, LLCpublic domain
OPINION & ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Larry Morrison brings this action under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) against Defendants Eminence Capital 1, John Doe, and Tailored Brands, Inc. (“Tailored Brands”). Defendants now move for dismissal under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b), 12(b)(1), and 12
Coty Inc. v. Excell Brands, LLCpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: Imitation may well be the sincerest form of flattery, but if taken too far it can also be costly. Plaintiffs in this case—Coty, Inc., Coty B.V., Calvin Klein Trademark Trust, Calvin Klein, Inc., Calvin Klein Cosmetic Corporation, Vera Wang Licensing LLC, V.E.W., Ltd., and Ate My Heart Inc. (collectively, “
Opinion issued November 4, 2021. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NOS. 01-19-00844-CV, 01-19-00845-CV & 01-19-00846-CV ——————————— JANE DOE, Appellant V. YUM! BRANDS, INC., PIZZA HUT, INC., AND MUY P
OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge In this trademark lawsuit, two fashion companies go toe-to-toe over the right to affix a metal plate to the toe of “luxury” men’s sneakers. Plaintiff LVL XIII Brands, Inc. (“LVL XIII,” pronounced “Level 13”) is a New York start-up company that manufactures, markets, and sells men’s luxury athletic footwear. LVL XIII brings this action against defendan
Commonwealth Brands, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
678 F.Supp.2d 512 (2010) COMMONWEALTH BRANDS, INC.; Conwood Company, LLC; Discount Tobacco City and Lottery, Inc.; Lorillard Tobacco Company; National Tobacco Company, L.P.; and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES of America; United States Food and Drug Administration; Margaret Hamburg, Commissioner of the United States Food and Drug Administration; and Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the United States Department of Health
In re Chiquita Brands Int'l, Inc.public domain
KENNETH A. MARRA, United States District Judge This is a civil action to recover damages for the murder of six United States citizens in the Republic of Colombia. The Plaintiffs are a missionary organization, New Tribes Mission ("NTM"), and the relatives and representatives of six Americans who were kidnapped and killed in the 1990s by a Colombian terrorist organization known as the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia-"the
Luis Manuel Rodriguez v. Imperial Brands, PLC.public domain
USCA11 Case: 24-11487 Document: 90-1 Date Filed: 07/23/2026 Page: 1 of 32 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-11487 ____________________ LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, MARIA ROD
Bioganic Safety Brands, Inc. v. Amentpublic domain
174 F.Supp.2d 1168 (2001) BIOGANIC SAFETY BRANDS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Don AMENT, Colorado Commissioner of Agriculture, Defendant. No. 01-B-1808. United States District Court, D. Colorado. November 20, 2001. *1169 *1170 *1171 M. Miller Baker, Richard B. Roge
Victor S. Urrutia v. Interstate Brands Internationalpublic domain
HJELM, J. [¶ 1] After sustaining injuries in an industrial workplace accident, Victor S. Urrutia was paid total incapacity workers' compensation benefits by his employer, Interstate Brands International. For more than three years, he received the full amount of those benefits while also collecting Social Security retirement benefits. When Interstate learned that Urrutia was receiving
706 A.2d 877 (1998) NABISCO BRANDS, INC. and Travelers Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (ALMARA), Respondent. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs April 11, 1997. Decided January 6, 1998. *878 James M. Poerio, Pittsburgh, for petitioners. Daniel K. Bricmont, Pittsbur
Zakaryan v. Men's Wearhouse, Inc.public domain
HOFFSTADT, J. *664The Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA) deputizes individual employees to step *665into the shoes of our state's labor enforcement agency and sue their employers for underpaid wages and
Zakaryan v. The Men's Warehouse, Inc.public domain
Filed 3/28/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO ARTHUR ZAKARYAN, B289192 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC647541) v. THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles Count
Canna Provisions, Inc. v. Bondipublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1628 CANNA PROVISIONS, INC.; GYASI SELLERS; WISEACRE FARM, INC.; VERANO HOLDINGS CORP., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General* Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Apple Inc.public domain
Case: 21-1568 Document: 72 Page: 1 Filed: 02/09/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ UNILOC USA, INC., UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A., Plaintiffs-Appellants UNILOC 2017 LLC, Plaintiff v. APPLE INC., Defendant-Appellee ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, Intervenor-Appell
Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Apple Inc.public domain
Case: 21-1568 Document: 72 Page: 1 Filed: 02/09/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ UNILOC USA, INC., UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A., Plaintiffs-Appellants UNILOC 2017 LLC, Plaintiff v. APPLE INC., Defendant-Appellee ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, Intervenor-Appell
SportFuel, Inc. v. PepsiCo, Inc.public domain
Kanne, Circuit Judge. SportFuel appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment for Gatorade and its parent company, PepsiCo. SportFuel brought this suit against Gatorade alleging violations of its trademark after Gatorade rebranded itself with the slogan, "Gatorade The Sports Fuel Company." The district court deemed Gatorade's slogan a fair use protected by the Lanham Act. We af
Fortiline, Inc. v. Hayne McCallpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FORTILINE, INC. and PATRIOT ) SUPPLY HOLDINGS, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Consolidated v. ) C.A. No. 2024-0211-MTZ ) HAYNE MCCALL, CHRISTOPHER ) ANTOS
Curtin v. United Trademark Holdings, Inc.public domain
Case: 23-2140 Document: 74 Page: 1 Filed: 05/22/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ REBECCA CURTIN, Appellant v. UNITED TRADEMARK HOLDINGS, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2023–2140 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent an
State v. Cabela's Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, ex rel. ) KATHLEEN JENNINGS, Attorney ) General of the State of Delaware, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) C.A. N23M-06-118 JRJ ) CABELA’S INC.,