Cases

661 F.3d 495 (2011) TW TELECOM HOLDINGS INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CAROLINA INTERNET LTD., Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-1068. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. November 15, 2011. *496 Christopher Sean Spivey, Calvin Terbeek, T. Wade Welch, Esq., T. Wade Welch & Associates, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

ROBERT H. JACOBVITZ, United States Bankruptcy Judge Debtor Cashco, Inc. ("Debtor" or "Cashco") commenced Adversary Proceeding No. 18-1055-j in this Court by removing a *141state court class action lawsuit to bankruptcy court. See Docket No. 11 - Notice of Removal. Plaintiff in the adversary proceeding subsequently filed a motion for r

ROBERT H. JACOBVITZ, United States Bankruptcy Judge *11At a status conference held December 12, 2018, an issue arose concerning the applicability of the automatic stay to the removal of a state court class action lawsuit to this Court initiating Adversary Proceeding No. 18-1055-J, and whether, if the stay did not apply to removal, the automatic stay applies to the continua

KEVIN R. ANDERSON, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION The matter before the Court is a motion for relief from stay to allow the film studios to continue their prosecution of pending copyright litigation against the Debtor in the Central District of California. The Court has heard the arguments of counsel, heard the testimony of witnesses, and received exhibits into evidence as noted on the record.

MATHESON, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Savant Home, Inc. (“Savant”) is a custom home designer and builder. It holds a registered copyright to a floor plan of a three-bedroom ranch house (“Anders Plan”). Savant built a model house embodying that plan in Windsor, Colorado (“Savant house”). In June 2009, Ron and Tammie Wagner toured the Savant house

JOHN F. FISCHER, Chief Judge. 11 Plaintiff Hawk Enterprises, Inc., appeals an order of the district court granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to Hawk's tortious interference theory of recovery.1 The appeal has been assigned to the accelerated docket pursuant to Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.86(b), 12 0.8. Supp. 2008, ch. 15, app. 1, and the matter stands submitted without appellate br

ORDER This matter is before us on Appellee’s Motion to Amend Opinion to Clarify Authority of IRS Office of Appeals over Rescission of I.R.C. § 6707A Penalties. Upon careful consideration, the motion is granted. The court’s February 21, 2017 opinion is withdrawn and replaced by the attached revised opinion. MATHESON, Circuit Judge.

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION RICHARD F. CEBULL, District Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiff Montana Silversmiths brings this action for copyright infringement and misappropriation of trade secrets against Taylor Brands and two of its former employees, Chris Roth and Marcia Eaton, who now work for Taylor Brands. M

FILED U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit November 5, 2015 Blaine F. Bates NOT FOR PUBLICATI

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 13, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-730 Lower Tribunal No. 15-23495 ________________ National Medical Imaging, LLC, et al.,

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT H. JACOBVITZ, United States Bankruptcy Judge Debtor, Bartolo Montoya, pro se (Mr. Montoya, or “Debtor”), complains that the Pueblo of Isleta Tax Administration and the Isleta Tribal Court willfully violated the automatic stay by entering an Order on Motion for Tax Lien and Stay of Proceedings Against Real and Personal Property (“Tax Lien and Stay Order” or “Or

Appellate Case: 22-7061 Document: 010111031799 Date Filed: 04/15/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 15, 2024

OPINION * PER CURIAM Pro se appellant Edward C. Tidwell (“Tidwell”) appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in his bankruptcy adversary proceeding. We will affirm the District Court’s dismissal. I. Tidwell, a resident of Antioch, California, attempted to intervene in a Chapter 11 proceed

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge. On January 23, 2017, the Dale Circuit Court ("the trial court") entered a judgment modifying certain provisions of a judgment that divorced Myong C. Alt ("the wife") and Mark J. Alt ("the husband"). The trial court, apparently ex mero motu, amended that modification judgment the next day. On February 24, 2017, the husband filed a notice of appeal to this court. However, while the a

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY * CAROLYN B. McHUGH, Circuit Judge. Johnny Brett Gregory, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se,1 wishes to appeal the district court’s rejection of his Rule 60(d)(3) motion to set aside its order denying him habeas relief. To do so, he must first obtain a certificate of appealability (COA) from this court. F

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM STAY HELEN E. BURRIS, US Bankruptcy Judge, District of South Carolina THIS MATTER is before the Court for consideration of the Motion filed by Henry Lazcano and Guaray “Mike” Gupta (“Mov-*341ants”).1 Movants seek relief from the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)2

McKAY, Circuit Judge. John H. Schoppe petitions for review of a Tax Court decision finding him liable for tax deficiencies for the years 2002 through 2007. While the case was proceeding in this court, Mr. Schoppe filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition. That filing prompted this court to request supplemental briefing from the parties on whether the automatic bankruptcy stay in 11

Chapter 11 ORDER ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY Howard R. Tallman, Chief Judge United States Bankruptcy Court This case comes before the Court on Dr. Judy Baack’s Motion for Relief from Automatic Stay Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(d) (docket # 62) (the “Motion”). The Court conducted a preliminary hearing on the Motion on February 11, 2014

Opinion PEARCE, Judge: 11 Paul Melancon set fire to his brother's house. After his arrest, he met with a prosecutor and accepted a plea deal. As part of that deal, Paul Melancon agreed to testify that he had enkindled the house as part of a plan his brother, Michael Melancon (Defendant), had devised to collect the proceeds of an insurance policy. Before Defen

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge. Timothy Andrews ("the husband") and Wanda Andrews ("the wife) were divorced by an October 2, 2013, judgment of the Houston Circuit Court ("the trial court") that incorporated a settlement agreement reached by the parties. The October 2, 2013, divorce judgment provided, in relevant part: "(5) ALIMONY: The husband shall pay to the wife the sum of $500 each month, for a period of eigh