Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “TSAWD Holdings, Inc.”
Mary F. Walrath, United States Bankruptcy Judge Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB ("WSFS") and Sport Dimension a/k/a Body Glove ("Sport Dimension"). The dispute is which party has a priority interest in the inventory, and its proceeds, sold by the Debtors on consignment from Sport Dimension (the "Disputed Goods"). For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant
Mary F. Walrath, United States Bankruptcy Judge *678Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment under Rule 56(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff-Intervenor Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB ("WSFS") seeks disgorgement of proceeds from certain goods sold on consignment. Defendant Performance Apparel Corporation ("PAC") contends it is en
MEMORANDUM OPINION2 Mary F. Walrath, United States Bankruptcy Judge Before the Court is a Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Intervening Plaintiff, Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB (<CWSFS”), seeking a declaration that it has a perfected security interest in the Debtors’ inventory and sale proceeds senior to that of M J Soffe, LLC (“Soffe”) and seekin
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 Mary F. Walrath, United States Bankruptcy Judge Before the Court is a Joint Motion for Summary Judgment2 filed by TSA Stores, Inc. (“TSA Stores”) and Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc. (“Yusen”) (collectively, the “Movants”) in an adversary proceeding brought by 02Cool, LLC (“02Cool”). In its Complaint, 02Cool seeks a determination
JCF AFFM Debt Holdings. L.P. v. Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc. (In re Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc.)public domain
OPINION1 Sontchi, J. INTRODUCTION Before the Court are two related motions to dismiss the remaining claims and counterclaims in this adversary proceeding. Ultimately, beyond the comprehensive arguments, this matter is simple. The parties put forward antithetic theses to justify their priority entitlement to the funds in the bank account at issue here. Those f
Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc. v.public domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 20-1136 _____________ IN RE: OREXIGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC., Debtor MCKESSON CORPORATION; RXC ACQUISITION COMPANY, Appellants _______________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delawar