Cases

Opinions of the United 2003 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-11-2003 Trustees Natl v. Lutyk Precedential or Non-Pre

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 36 In the Matter of the Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litigation. Donald J. Terwilliger, &c., Appellant, v. Beazer East, Inc., &c., et al., Defendants, Honeywell Int

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. In this appeal two creditors, Hoxie Feeders, Inc. and Sprague National Bank, both claim first priority security interests in the same cattle. The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court’s summary judgment for Hoxie holding that Hoxie’s purchase money *639 securi

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

ACCEPTED 01-15-00556-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/21/2015 10:14:05 PM CHRIST

ACCEPTED 14-15-00882-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/28/2015 8:14:08 PM CHRISTOPHER

ACCEPTED 01-15-00571-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/24/2015 9:45:33 PM CHRIST

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Gabbard v. Madison Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn., Slip Opinion No. 2021-Ohio-2067.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43

Brogan, Judge. {¶ 1} Appellants, Michael F. Dakin, Warrior Racing, Inc., Indian Creek Properties, L.L.C., and Indian Creek Fabricators, Inc., appeal from the trial court’s order granting appellee Tipp City a permanent injunction prohibiting the display of a mural on the wall of their building. {¶ 2} Tipp City brought this action against appellants on July 5, 2007, claiming that the mural violated its sign

Herbert R. Brown, J. This case presents two issues for our determination: (1) whether, under R.C. Chapter 4117, the Public Employees’ Collective Bargaining Act, a provision in a collective bargaining agreement prevails over a conflicting provision in a municipal home-rule charter, and (2) whether the collective bargaining agreement at issue here requires the city to deduct contributions to PEOPLE. For the reasons which follow, we

394 B.R. 721 (2008) In re M. FABRIKANT & SONS, INC., et al., Reorganized Debtors. The Official Committee of Unsecured, Creditors of M. Fabrikant & Sons, Inc.; and Fabrikant-Leer, International, Ltd., Plaintiff, v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.; ABN Amro Bank N.V.; Bank of America, N.A.; HSBC Bank USA, National Association; Bank Leumi USA; Israel Discount Bank of New York; Antwerpse Diamantbank, N.V.; Sovereign Precious Metals, Llc; and S

Douglas, J., dissenting. The specific issue presented here is whether R.C. 4117.14(1) is unconstitutional either because it divests municipalities of essential powers of self-government, or because it unlawfully delegates municipal legislative authority. I believe that R.C. 4117.14(1) passes muster on both counts. I dissent to today’s decision at some length because, in my judgment, the majority opinion flouts

[Cite as Elevation Ents., Ltd. v. NMRD, Ltd., 2023-Ohio-4433.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Elevation Enterprises Limited, : No. 22AP-105 Plaintiff-Appellant, : (C.P.C. No. 19CV-0274) v. : (REGULAR CALENDA

[Cite as J.P. v. T.H., 2020-Ohio-320.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) J. P. C.A. No. 19CA011469 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE T. H.

[Cite as Ra v. Ohio Atty. Gen., 2020-Ohio-1346.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Kevin Ra et al., : Plaintiffs-Appellants, : No. 19AP-533 v. : (Ct. of Cl. No. 2019-00212JD) Ohio Attorney General's Office,

[Cite as Precision Strip, Inc. v. Dircksen, 2020-Ohio-6668.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT AUGLAIZE COUNTY PRECISION STRIP, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 2-19-12 v. STEVEN DIRCKSEN, ET AL., OPINION DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. PRECISION STRIP, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 178 Ohio St.3d 3.] WEIDMAN, APPELLEE, v. HILDEBRANT, APPELLANT. [Cite as Weidman v. Hildebrant, 2024-Ohio-2931.] Statute of limitations—R.C. 2305.11—Libel—Discovery rule—Discovery rule applies to claims of libel based on reputational injuries when the publication of the libelous statements was secretive, concealed, or otherwise inherently unknowable to plaintiff due to nature

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Weidman v. Hildebrant, Slip Opinion No. 2024-Ohio-2931.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Parker Bey v. Byrd, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-2766.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of an

MEMORANDUM OPINION KARON OWEN BOWDRE, Chief Judge. This matter comes before the court on Defendants CMC, Inc and Harsco Corporation’s “Joint Motion for Summary Judgment,” (Doc. 74), and CMC and Harsco’s “Joint Motion to Exclude Testimony of DR Davies Contractor LLC,” (Doc. 76). Plaintiff Gadsden Industrial Park, LLC sued CMC and Harsco for conversion and negligence stemm