Cases

EATON, J. ¶ 1. Defendant appeals his convictions, following trial by jury, on two counts of violation of an abuse protection order (VAPO), second offense. See 13 V.S.A. § 1030. Because we find the State failed to prove defendant was validly served with the order he was accused of violating, we reverse. ¶ 2. The evidence in support of the jury verdict was as follows

OPINION Opinion by Justice Evans Timothy O’Reilly appeals the county criminal court of appeals’s judgments affirming his convictions following a jury trial in municipal court for violations of two ordinances of the City of Richardson: (a) violation of Richardson, Texas Code of Ordinances ch. 14, art. 1, § 14-2(10) (2016) (nuisance o

Sykes, Circuit Judge. For more than half a century, Caterpillar Inc. paid unemployment benefits to laid-off employees at its manufacturing plant in Joliet, Illinois. This arrangement lasted until Caterpillar and the local union agreed to end the program in their 2012 collective-bargaining agreement. In exchange for the elimination of the benefits, Caterpillar distributed $7.8 million to

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alexander Matthews appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint and amended complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d

F. Dennis Saylor IV, United States District Judge This is a federal constitutional challenge to the firearm licensing policies of the Town of Brookline and the City of Boston. Plaintiffs Michael Gould, Christopher Hart, Danny Weng, Sarah Zesch, John Stanton, and Commonwealth Second Amendment, Inc. have brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA TIMOTHY MATTHEWS, Petitioner Employee, v. THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, CITY OF TUCSON, Respondent Employer, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT, Respondent Insurer.

436 B.R. 545 (2010) In re Jerone O'NEAL, Debtor. Diane Harper Hunt, Plaintiff, v. Jerone O'Neal, Debtor-Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 08-34846. Adversary No. 09-00805. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 13, 2010. *550 Timothy L. Rowells, Law Offices of Timothy Rowells & Assoc., Chicago, IL

OPINION HENRY, Senior Judge. The St. Matthews Fire Protection District appeals from an adverse summary judgment in the Jefferson Circuit Court, dismissing its claims against various Jefferson County tax collection officials arising from their failure to assess and collect a portion of the tax revenue due the District. Upon review, we affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUN

*775 COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. A group of seven plaintiffs, including Samantha Hill and Missouri Lieutenant Governor Peter Kinder (acting in his personal capacity), brought this action to challenge various provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“the Act”). Pub.L. No. 111-148, 124 Sta

ORDER David G. Campbell, United States District Judge In May 2013, this Court ruled that the Gaming Compact between the State of Arizona and the Tohono O’odham Nation did not prohibit the Nation from building a new casino in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Arizona v. Tohono O’odham Nation, 944 F.Supp.2d 748 (D.Ariz.2013) (“Tohono O’odham II”). Subsequently, the Nation began constructing a

ORDER David G. Campbell, United States District Judge Plaintiff Tohono O’odham Nation (the “Nation”) is currently constructing a major casino on land purchased in 2003 near Glendale, Arizona. In May 2013, this Court ruled that the 2002 Gaming Compact between the State of Arizona and the'Nation did not prohibit construction of another casino in the Phoenix metropolitan area, and the Nation elected to be

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2347 LIBERTY UNIVERSITY, INCORPORATED, a Virginia Nonprofit Corporation; MICHELE G. WADDELL; JOANNE V. MERRILL, Plaintiffs − Appellants, and MARTHA A. NEAL; DAVID STEIN, M.D.; PAUSANIAS ALEXANDER; MARY T. BENDORF; DELEGATE KATHY BYRON; JEFF HELGESON, Plaintiffs,

,~uise Pearson Clerk Court of Criminal Appeals § Ex.Parte Shane T. O'Grady P.O. Box 12.:308 § RE: Cause No. 58863 capitol Station § 412th Judicial Court Austin, Texas 78711 § § Dear Clerk, at this time I find it necessary to request your assistance to the following. ·Now comes Shane T. O'Grady in Cause No. 58863

Richard B. Teitelman, Judge Krikor Partamian, M.D. (Dr. Partami-an), and Phoenix Urology of St. Joseph, Inc. (collectively Appellants), appeal from a judgment awarding $4.3 million to Douglas Stewart (Respondent) on his claim for *54 medical negligence. Appellants argue that the trial court abused its

307 F.Supp.2d 1181 (2004) David GROGAN, Plaintiff, v. Timothy P. O'NEIL, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 03-2091-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 15, 2004. *1182 Gregory E. Keller, Harnes Keller LLP, New York City, James M. Crabtree, Lenexa, KS, for Plaintiff. Matthew J. Salzman, Kent E. Whittaker, Stinso

857 S.W.2d 57 (1993) Stanley JAMPOLE, William Jampole, Daniel Joseph Jampole, Debra E. Bodell, and Laura Sue Vinogradov, Appellants, v. W. Douglas MATTHEWS and Schmidt, Matthews & Brannon, P.C., n/k/a Schmidt & Matthews, Appellees. No. 01-91-00312-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). March 4, 1993. Opinion on Motion for Rehearing May 13,

292 F.Supp.2d 1282 (2003) David GROGAN, Plaintiff, v. Timothy P. O'NEIL, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 03-2091-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. November 21, 2003. *1283 *1284 Gregory E. Keller, Harnes Keller, LLP, New York City, James M. Crabtree, Lenexa, KS, for Plaintiff. <

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from the latest in a series of lawsuits by opponents of a proposed off-shore wind power generation facility in Nantucket Sound. Plaintiffs — who include the Town of Barnstable, a nonprofit advocacy group named Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, and businesses and individuals residing near the proposed facility

Supreme Court In re N.O. : No. 2023-224-Appeal. (PJ 22-2677) In re K.O. : No. 2023-226-Appeal. (PJ 22-2678) (Dissent begins on Page 21) NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Opinion Analyst, Supreme Court

ORDER AND REASONS SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge. Before the Court are plaintiff J.O.B Investments, LLC’s motion to remand1 and defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of America’s motion to sever,2 which is joined by defendant Mount Hawley Insurance Company.3 Because the Court finds that plaintiffs joinder of