Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “THOMAS v. CONTRACT CALLERS, INC.”
McGlone v. Contract Callers Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. On June 22, 2015, following the conclusion of a trial in which the jury rendered judgment for plaintiffs Michael McGlone et al. on claims brought under the Fair, Labor, Standards Act (FLSA) and the New York Labor Law (NYLL), the Court entered final judgment, holding defendants Contract Callers Inc. and William “Tim” Wertz jointly and several
McGlone v. Contract Callers Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. The jury having rendered a verdict finding for plaintiffs, the Court entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs on June 22, 2015. See Amended Judgment dated June 22, 2015, ECF Dkt. No. 159. Prior to entering judgment, the Court received submissions from the parties as to how the jury’s verdict translated into individual monetary judgments. (These submissio
Thomas v. Seterus Inc. (In re Thomas)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION William R. Sawyer, United States Bankruptcy Judge This adversary proceeding is before the Court on the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase (“Chase”). (Doc. 12). Plaintiffs Jack and Angela Thomas (“Plaintiffs”) allege that Chase willfully violated the automatic stay by sending them monthly mortgage statements and letters threatening to charge them for force-placed
In re Onstar Contract Litigationpublic domain
OPINION & ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION SEAN F. COX, District Judge. Buyers and lessees of automobiles equipped with OnStar telematics equipment filed prospective class action complaints against four automobile manufacturers (General Motors Corporation (“GM”), American Honda Motor Company (“Honda”), Subaru of America (“Subaru”), and Volkswagen of America (“VW”)), an
State v. Thomas Zingispublic domain
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State v. Thomas Zingis (A-66-21) (087132) Argued March 26, 2024 -- Decided August 8, 2024 -- Revised November 7, 2024 NORIEGA, J., writing for a unanimous Court. In State v. Cassidy
State v. Thomas Zingispublic domain
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State v. Thomas Zingis (A-66-21) (087132) Argued March 26, 2024 -- Decided August 8, 2024 NORIEGA, J., writing for a unanimous Court. In State v. Cassidy, 235 N.J. 482, 486 (2018),
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 13, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00173-CV JOSEPH ANTHONY THOMAS, Appellant V. LAKE COVE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 157th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court
David Thomas v. State of Mississippipublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-KA-01146-SCT DAVID THOMAS a/k/a DAVID LEE THOMAS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/06/2016 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JEFF WEILL, SR. TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: BRAD McCULLOUCH GRETA HARRIS CHRISTOPHER ROUTH ER
David Thomas v. State of Mississippipublic domain
CHAMBERLIN, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. David Thomas admitted in oral and written statements to police that he and Jontez Garvis had attacked Fred Jackson and stolen cash from him. After being hospitalized for forty-one days due to the injuries inflicted by the two men, Jackson died. Thomas was indicted for and convicted of capital murder. The trial court sentenced Thomas to life in prison without parole. After review, w
Michael Anderson v. Thomas Snoddypublic domain
ACCEPTED 06-14-00096-cv SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 5/26/2015 4:11:56 PM
Bratton v. Thomas Law Firm, PCpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs [ECF No. 12] filed by the Plaintiff, Richard Bratton, on September 12, 2012. The Plaintiff attached numerous exhibits to his Motion, including a Bill of Costs [ECF No. 12-17]. The Plaintiff asks the Court to award him $3,062.50 in attorneys’ fees and $425.00 in costs. The Defenda
James Hulce v. Zipongo Inc.public domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-1623 JAMES C. HULCE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ZIPONGO INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United S
Anoush Cab, Inc. v. Uber Tech. Inc.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-2001 ANOUSH CAB, INC.; ARAMS, INC.; ARARRAT, INC.; ATLANTIC CAB, INC.; BARLOW CAB, INC.; BEDROS CAB, INC.; BOYLSTON CAB, INC.; BRIGHAM CAB, INC.; CLEVELAND CAB, INC.; DIAMOND CAB, INC.; ELSIE CAB, INC.; FENWAY TAXI,INC.; G&A CAB, INC.; JORDAN CAB, INC.; JUBRAN CAB, INC.; KILMARNOCK CAB,INC.; LITTLE ISLAND CAB, INC.; LOCUST CAB, INC.; LONGWOOD CAB, INC.; M & AN CAB, INC.; M.P.E. CAB, INC.; MARBED C
James Hulce v. Zipongo Inc.public domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-1623 JAMES C. HULCE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ZIPONGO INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United S
James Hulce v. Zipongo Inc.public domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-1623 JAMES C. HULCE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ZIPONGO INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United S
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Digitas, Inc.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-2113 KEN JOHANSEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP INC., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, SPANISH QUOTES, INC., d/b/a WeSpeakInsurance, Defendant,
Williams v. Red Coats, Inc.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROBYN D. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00571 (CJN) RED COATS, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Robyn D. Williams alleges that her former employer, Red Coats Inc., and supervisor, Deine Avila, violated her right to medical le
ACCEPTED 04-14-00735-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 2/20/2015 1:49:45 PM
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE COMCAST CABLE ) COMMUNICATIONS ) MANAGEMENT, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2024-0991-LWW ) CX360, INC. f/k/a INTRADO ) INTERACTI
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DOHERTY & ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, V. C.A. N0. N12C-12-145 FWW DelaWare corporation, T & D INSURANCE, INC., a Delaware corporation, THGMAS WISELEY INSURANCE, INC., a Pennsylvania foreign corporation, and THOMAS WISELEY, ) ) ) ) ) § PEOPLE FIRST lNSURANCE, INC., a ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) Submitted: January 16, 2018 Decided: March 22, 2018 Upon Defendant People First Insurance, Inc.’s Motion to Vacate Default Jud