⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “THOMAS GEORGE PHARO”

Brown v. Perezpublic domain
District Court, D. Colorado · 2014-12-23 · Published · cited 0× · 76 F. Supp. 3d 1217; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177200; 2014 WL 7336788
ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RAYMOND P. MOORE, United States District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 51 & 52). Plaintiffs Blake Brown, Dean Biggs, Jacqueline De-herrera, Ruth Ann Head, Marlene Mason, Roxanne McFall, Richard Medlock and Bernadette Smith (“Plaintiffs”) seek an order finding that Defendants viola
Medina v. Astruepublic domain
District Court, D. Colorado · 2012-03-21 · Published · cited 0× · 847 F. Supp. 2d 1314; 2012 WL 952831; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38031
ORDER REVERSING DISABILITY DECISION AND REMANDING TO COMMISSIONER BLACKBURN, District Judge. The matter before me is plaintiffs Complaint [# 1]1 filed December 13, 2010, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying plaintiffs claim for supplemental security income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401, et seq. I have jurisdic
Hale v. Ashcroftpublic domain
District Court, D. Colorado · 2009-08-19 · Published · cited 3× · 683 F. Supp. 2d 1189; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73921; 2009 WL 2601312
683 F.Supp.2d 1189 (2009) Matthew F. HALE, Plaintiff, v. John ASHCROFT, Alberto Gonzales, Harrell Watts, R. Wiley, Michael Nalley, F.A. Bierschbach, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Harley Lappin, Harvey Church, U.S. Penitentiary-Max, Federal Bureau of Prisons, and Kathleen Hawk Sawyer, Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-cv-00541-PAB-KLM. United States District Court, D. Colorado.
District Court, D. Colorado · 2008-02-12 · Published · cited 129× · 619 F. Supp. 2d 1107; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10219; 2008 WL 410369
(2008) Wilma G. VIALPANDO, Plaintiff, v. Mike JOHANNS, Secretary, United States Dept. of Agriculture, Defendant. Civil Action No. 05-cv-01904-MSK-BNB. United States District Court, D. Colorado. February 12, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AND RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW, AND GRANTING, IN PART, MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FE
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2024-07-19 · Published · cited 0×
Rel: July 19, 2024 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS SPECIAL
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997-07-16 · Published · cited 0× · 119 F.3d 816; 1997 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1135; 27 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21370; 137 Oil & Gas Rep. 248; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 17750; 1997 WL 398539
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge. The Southern Ute Indian Tribe (the Tribe) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants Amoco Production Company and others on the Tribe’s claim to ownership of coal bed methane (CBM) contained in coal acquired by the Tribe as successor in interest to a statutory reservation of coal to the United States. The Tribe also appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the Se
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2011-04-14 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued April 14, 2011 In The Court of Appeals
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2019-04-11 · Published · cited 0× · 373 F. Supp. 3d 1172
JON P. McCALLA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Federal Express Corporation ("FedEx") on November 14, 2018. (ECF No. 37.) In this lawsuit, Preston asserts that FedEx terminated his employment because he is white, *1176because he is male, and in retaliation for reportin
State v. Kelleypublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003-03-21 · Published · cited 38× · 658 N.W.2d 279; 265 Neb. 563; 2003 Neb. LEXIS 43
658 N.W.2d 279 (2003) 265 Neb. 563 STATE of Nebraska, Appellee, v. Terry W. KELLEY, Appellant. No. S-02-742. Supreme Court of Nebraska. March 21, 2003. *283 W. Randall Paragas, of Paragas Law Offices, Omaha, for appellant. Don Stenberg, Attorney General, and George R. Love for appellee. HENDR
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-01-18 · Published · cited 0× · 318 F. App'x 451
MEMORANDUM * The Britton Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for relief from the judgment of dismissal entered two years earlier for failure to comply with case management orders in this multidistrict litigation. The Britton Plaintiffs argue that they are entitled to relief under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) and 60(b)(6) because they did not
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-01-18 · Published · cited 0× · 318 F. App'x 451
MEMORANDUM * The Britton Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for relief from the judgment of dismissal entered two years earlier for failure to comply with case management orders in this multidistrict litigation. The Britton Plaintiffs argue that they are entitled to relief under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) and 60(b)(6) because they did not
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991-01-25 · Published · cited 47× · 919 F.2d 1014
919 F.2d 1014 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,739, 14 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 336J.B. HARALSON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants,v.The E.F. HUTTON GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants,Cross-Appellees.The E.F. HUTTON GROUP, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,Cross-Appellees,v.George J. AUBIN, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants. No. 88-2999. United Sta
District Court, D. Colorado · 1990-06-20 · Published · cited 10× · 751 F. Supp. 1454; 113 Oil & Gas Rep. 4; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15025; 1990 WL 172541
751 F.Supp. 1454 (1990) MARATHON OIL COMPANY, Joan L. Savage, Barbara Cliff Toner, and Frank G. Cooley, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Cameron Cliff, Plaintiffs, v. Manuel LUJAN, Jr., Secretary of the Interior, Delos Sy Jamison, Director, Bureau of Land Management, and the Department of the Interior, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 89-F-1829. United States District Court, D. Colorado.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989-09-18 · Published · cited 61× · 885 F.2d 723; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14229
885 F.2d 723 Blue Sky L. Rep. P 73,025, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,730,RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 7327 Ernest ROSS, individually and as representative of abondholder class, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.BANK SOUTH, N.A., et al., Defendants,Alston & Bird, et al., Defendants-Appellants.George MILLER, individually and as a representative of aclass of bondholders described in the complaint,Plaintiff-Appell
Brueck v. Kringspublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1981-07-24 · Published · cited 3× · 638 P.2d 904; 6 Kan. App. 2d 622; 230 Kan. 466; 631 P.2d 1233; 1981 Kan. App. LEXIS 323
6 Kan. App. 2d 622 (1981) 631 P.2d 1233 BERNARD J. BRUECK, et al., and KANSAS SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellants and Cross-Appellees, and JAMES and MARGARET CURRENS, et al., Plaintiffs-Intervenors, v. T.R. KRINGS, et al., Defendants, and PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL & Co., Appellee and Cross-Appellants. Reversed 230 Kan. 466, 638 P.2d 904 (1982). No. 51,945 Court of Appeals
District Court, D. Colorado · 1995-02-05 · Published · cited 5× · 874 F. Supp. 1142; 1995 WL 50038
874 F.Supp. 1142 (1995) SOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBE, Plaintiff, v. AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY; Shirley K. Adams; Henry Ashworth; Carla M. Aspaas; Eric K. Aspaas; Helen Ruth Aspaas; Laura Belle Aspaas; Leta M. Adkins; Rita M. Adkins; Maxwell C. Anderson; Earl A. Barker; Heirs of Maurice C. Breen, Deceased; Horace F. Buchanan; The Heirs of Horace Buchanan, Deceased; George A. Bugg; Carbone Investment Company; Jack Carmack; Rowland Carmack; Joseph C. Ci
Brueck v. Kringspublic domain
Supreme Court of Kansas · 1982-01-15 · Published · cited 32× · 638 P.2d 904; 230 Kan. 466; 1982 Kan. LEXIS 192
230 Kan. 466 (1982) 638 P.2d 904 BERNARD J. BRUECK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and KANSAS SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, and JAMES and MARGARET CURRENS, et al., Intervening Plaintiffs, v. T.R. KRINGS, et al., Defendants, and PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL & CO., Defendant-Appellee. No. 51,945 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed Ja
District Court, D. Colorado · 1994-09-13 · Published · cited 2× · 863 F. Supp. 1389; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13223; 1994 WL 510919
863 F.Supp. 1389 (1994) SOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBE, Plaintiff, v. AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY; Shirley K. Adams; Henry Ashworth; Carla M. Aspaas; Eric K. Aspaas; Helen Ruth Aspaas; Laura Belle Aspaas; Leta M. Adkins; Rita M. Adkins; Maxwell C. Anderson; Earl A. Barker; Heirs of Maurice C. Breen, Deceased; Horace F. Buchanan; The Heirs of Horace Buchanan, Deceased; George A. Bugg; Carbone Investment Company; Jack Carmack; Rowland Carmack; Joseph C. Ci
In Re Pan Am Corp.public domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991-03-18 · Published · cited 4× · 124 B.R. 960; 14 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 571; 24 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 935; 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 313; 21 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 757; 1991 WL 35396
124 B.R. 960 (1991) In re PAN AM CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. Bankruptcy Nos. 91 B 10080 (CB)-91 B 10087 (CB). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. March 18, 1991. *961 Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton by George Weisz, Jerome E. Hyman, Thomas J. Maloney, James W. Pharo, Robert P. Davis, Howard Zelbo, New York City, for d
Brandt v. Surberpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2006-06-08 · Published · cited 35× · 194 S.W.3d 108; 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 4962; 2006 WL 1550842
OPINION Opinion by Justice HINOJOSA. This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment in a medical malpractice case that arose from the death of William Tate Surber (“Tate”). Appellees, Kelley Brooke Surber (“Brooke”), individually and on behalf of the Estate of William Tate Surber, Deceased, and as next friend of Loren Bailey Surber and Nicholas Tate