Cases

256 F.Supp. 617 (1966) I. William BIANCHI, Jr., and Quentin B. Sammis, Plaintiffs, v. Evans K. GRIFFING, William P. Bain, Lester M. Albertson, William J. Leonard, Stephen F. Meschutt, Ralph J. Osgood, Charles R. Dominy, Robert J. Flynn, Arthur M. Cromarty, and Thomas J. Harwood, constituting the Board of Supervisors of Suffolk County, New York, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 62-C-821. United States District C

122 B.R. 527 (1990) In re GRAHAM SQUARE, INC. Bankruptcy No. 690-01182. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio. July 11, 1990. *528 John P. Van Abel, Amerman, Burt & Jones, Canton, Ohio, for debtor. Stephen D. Thompson, Black, McCuskey, Souers & Arbaugh, Canton, Ohio, for Union Nat. Bank of Pittsburgh. Russ Kendi

ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING W.C. DAVIS, Judge. A majority of this Court denies the State’s motion for rehearing on the basis that the trial court committed reversible error in allowing certain evidence to be admitted. The evidence in question consisted of the testimony of police officer Ivan Lenin Gus-tin as to “the victim’s out-of-court declaration ... that appellant was the individ

USCA11 Case: 23-12160 Document: 82-1 Date Filed: 05/13/2025 Page: 1 of 127 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-12160 ____________________ HM FLORIDA-ORL, LLC,

USCA11 Case: 23-12160 Document: 82-1 Date Filed: 05/13/2025 Page: 1 of 127 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-12160 ____________________ HM FLORIDA-ORL, LLC,

Appellees were formerly husband and wife. They were married on March 27, 1916 and consorted as husband and wife until on or about the latter part of October 1942. On or about April 15, 1942, the husband obtained employment *Page 429 in Pascagoula, in Jackson County, and went from his home in Lamar County to Pascagoula, but returned on frequent visits to his wife and children who had remained in Lamar County, these visits extending up until about the latte

Garland, J. On the 30th of August, 1830, the mother of the plaintiffs, acting as the administratrix of her deceased husband? presented her petition to the Court of Probates, representiii'g the estate as largely indebted, and as having no means of paying the debts, except by a sale of the property ; she, therefore, prayed for a family meeting, and a sale of the real and personal estate. The judge ordered a family meeting to assem

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of the appellant, in which the trial court granted a partial judgment against the former guardian of appellant’s ward. Appellant’s contention here is that the trial court erred in not granting a summary judgment in the full sum of $70,000.00, the amoun

11/21/2017 DA 16-0769 Case Number: DA 16-0769 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2017 MT 284 ZINVEST, LLC, a Montana limited liability company, Plaintiff and Appellee, v.

Case: 21-2063 Document: 73 Page: 1 Filed: 08/16/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INCEPT LLC, Appellant v. PALETTE LIFE SCIENCES, INC., Appellee KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Case: 21-2063 Document: 73 Page: 1 Filed: 08/16/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INCEPT LLC, Appellant v. PALETTE LIFE SCIENCES, INC., Appellee KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

WINTER, Chief Judge: Intervenors — plaintiffs in In re NASDAQ Market-Makers Antitrust Litigation, 94 Civ. 3996(RWS)—appeal from two decisions by Judge Sweet. The first approved a consent decree between the United States and appel-lees. On appeal, appellants challenge a provision of the consent decree that largely prohibits certain audio tapes from being subject to discovery or admitted at trial. Judge Sweet’s other deci

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DICKINSON, Presiding Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. After the estate of a former resident sued a nursing home for negligent care, the primary insurance carrier employed lawyers to defend the suit. Because the *422lawyers failed to timely designate an expert witness, the settlement value of the ease gre

OPINION SMITH, Circuit Judge. This case concerns the applicable burdens of proof for establishing jurisdiction in a removal action under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(d), 1453. Defendant in this action, Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America (“Travelers”), removed the case to the United States District Court for the E

OWEN, Circuit Judge: Dennis Ingles was convicted of mail fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud because of his involvement in an arson scheme to defraud State Farm Insurance Company. Dennis challenges his convictions and sentences on three primary grounds, claiming that: 1) there is insufficient evidence to support his convictions; 2) the district court

MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge. Presently pending and ready for resolution in this breach of contract case are: (1) a motion for summary judgment on counts I and VIII of its amended complaint filed *596by Plaintiff J.E. Dunn Construction Company (“J.E. Dunn” or “Plaintiff’) (ECF No. 95); (2) a cross motion for summary judgme

RULING AND ORDER BRIAN A. JACKSON, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this consolidated patent infringement action,1 Plaintiff Gator Tail, LLC alleges that certain boat motors produced by Defendants Go-Devil Manufacturing Co. of La., Inc. and Mud Buddy, LLC infringe the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit. (08-cv-00124 Doc. 20; 08-cv-00125 Doc. 1

692 F.Supp.2d 1040 (2010) Michael HAVILAND, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated employees, Plaintiffs, v. CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES-IOWA, CORP., Defendant. No. 4:07-cv-18 RP-TJS. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. March 12, 2010. *1041 Thomas Andrew Newkirk, Jill M. Zwagerman, Newk

OPINION OF THE COURT GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. I. Factual and Procedural Background In this civil action the jury returned a verdict against the defendants-appellants CIGNA Corporation and Marlene Graham, CIGNA’S head of security, for $377,500 in favor of the plaintiff-appellee Jackey B. Griffiths on his claims for retaliatory discharge under section 704(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C.

Rehearing en banc granted, August 22, 2007 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ALI SALEH KAHLAH AL-MARRI,  Petitioner-Appellant, and MARK A. BERMAN, as next friend, Petitioner, v. COMMANDER S. L. WRIGHT, USN Commander, Consolidated Naval Brig, Respondent-Appellee. SPECIALISTS IN THE LAW OF WAR; PROFESSORS O