Cases

OPINION AND ORDER GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge. Before the Court are several motions relating to plaintiffs’ claims that certain of the workers whose employment taxes are at issue in these cases were actually independent contractors, not employees. Defendant has moved in limine to preclude plaintiffs from asserting their independent contractor claims based principally on the doctrine of variance

377 B.R. 513 (2007) In re SUNPOINT SECURITIES, INC., Debtor. Securities Investor Protection Corporation and Robert G. Richardson, Trustee of the Estate of Sunpoint Securities, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Cheshier & Fuller, L.L.P., King Bourland, Jeff Cheshier, Jack Sprawls, James Conner, Jack Savage and Bret Robertson, Defendants. Cheshier & Fuller, L.L.P., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Van R. Lewis, III, Mary Ellen Wilder, and Doug

262 B.R. 384 (2001) In re SUNPOINT SECURITIES, INC., Debtor. Securities Investor Protection Corporation and Robert G. Richardson, Trustee of the Estate of Sunpoint Securities, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Cheshier & Fuller, L.L.P., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 99-6073. Adversary No. 00-6068. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division. April 23, 2001.

OPINION BY JUDGE WOJCIK Before this Court are Respondents' 1 preliminary objections (POs) and the Department's Application for Summary Relief 2 to Petitioner Keystone ReLeaf LLC's Amended Petition for Review in the Nature of a C

388 B.R. 795 (2008) In re J & M SALUPO DEVELOPMENT CO., Debtor. Paul T. and Nancy Hamerly, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Fifth Third Mortgage Company, Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-8026. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit. Argued February 5, 2008. Decided April 18, 2008. *799 ARGUED: J

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0177p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Appellee,

476 F.Supp.2d 1159 (2007) CELERITY, INC., Plaintiff, v. ULTRA CLEAN HOLDING, INC., et al., Defendants. No. C 05-4374 MMCJL. United States District Court, N.D. California. February 28, 2007. *1160 *1161 Chris Kao, Karin Morgan Frenza, Richard Steven Swope, Robert E. Camors, Jr., Samuel Joseph M

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-appellants L.W. Packard & Co. (“Packard”) and Cashmere & Camel Hair Manufacturers Institute (the “Institute”) appeal from the district court’s entry of partial summary judgment dismissing their false advertising claims under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and Massachusetts state law. In particular, Packard ch

249 B.R. 200 (2000) In re Marilyn M. MOSS, Debtor. Steven C. Block, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Citizens Bank, et al., Defendants. Steven C. Block, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Prudential Securities, et al., Defendants. Steven C. Block, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Marilyn M. Moss, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 98-43272-1, Adversary No. 99-4200-1, Adversary No. 99-4203-1, Adversary No. 00-4058-1. <

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 3 {¶ 1} Ramin Yazdani-Isfehani ("father") appeals two separate judgments of the Athens County Court of Common Pleas. The first overrules his objections to the magistrate's decision and determines that the court lacked jurisdiction to consider his motion for visitation in the context of Case No. 0

ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2008 FED App. 0008P (6th Cir.) File Name: 08b0008p.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT In re: J & M SALUPO DEVELOPMENT CO., ) ) Debtor. ) _____________________________________ ) ) PAUL T. AND NANCY HAMERLY, )

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 19-1404 ____________ CHRISTOPHER RAD, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ____________ On Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on two motions for summary judgment: Plaintiff William Mills’s Motion for Partial Sum-*1130raary Judgment on Defendant’s first affirmative defense [Docket No. 44], filed on September 19, 2013, and Defendant Haus-mann-McNally, S.C.’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Docket No. 62], filed on Decem

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Carmen Carulli and Barbara : Carulli, husband and wife : : v. : : North Versailles Township : Sanitary Authority : : v. : : Port V

74 Mich. App. 81 (1977) 253 N.W.2d 652 WILLIAM MOORS, INC. v. PINE LAKE SHOPPING CENTER, INC., #2 Docket No. 27118. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March 2, 1977. *82 Barris, Sott, Denn & Driker (by Stephen E. Glazek), for defendant Pine Lake Shopping Center, Inc., and defendant Securi

35 F.3d 799 30 Fed.R.Serv.3d 690 Robert D. SCHULMAN, t/a Maxi's Express, Appellant,v.J.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC.; Widener FundingCorp., Inc., Appellees. No. 93-1888. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued March 25, 1994.Decided Sept. 13, 1994.Sur Petition for RehearingOct. 14, 1994. <

ACCEPTED 15-25-00082-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/4/2025 4:15 PM No. 15-25-00082-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

Haymond, Judge: This is an original proceeding in prohibition instituted in this Court June 24, 1968, in which the petitioner, Omer Lynn, seeks a writ to prohibit the defendants, Honorable Don J. Eddy, Judge of the Circuit Court of Monongalia County, West Virginia, and Margie Lynn, herein sometimes referred to as the defendant, from proceeding further with the prosecution or the hearing of a civil action for divorce instituted in

163 S.E.2d 472 (1968) STATE ex rel. Omer LYNN v. The Honorable Don J. EDDY, Judge, Circuit Court of Monongalia County, West Virginia, and Margie Lynn. No. 12748. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted September 4, 1968. Decided October 1, 1968. *474 Joseph A. Laurita, Jr., and Charles H. Haden, II,

These appeals involve deficiencies in income taxes for the year 1920 in the following respective amounts: Elsie S. Eckstein, $265.59; Lois M. Stumer, $33.11; Louis M. Stumer II, $33.77; Gladys R. Byfield, $11.28; Benjamin J. Rosenthal, $886.36; Hannah S. Rosen-thal, $167.82; Aline Blanche Stumer, $33.77; Blanche G. Stumer, .$554.46; Elaine R. Reinhardt, $187; Louis Eckstein, $1,584.56. The issue raised by the appeals relates to the prop