Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-2649 CHICAGO TEACHERS UNION, LOCAL 1, AFT and MOSELEAN PARKER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United St

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-2649 CHICAGO TEACHERS UNION, LOCAL 1, AFT and MOSELEAN PARKER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United St

38 P.3d 12 (2002) 201 Ariz. 474 WELLS FARGO BANK, a National Banking Association, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellee, v. ARIZONA LABORERS, TEAMSTERS AND CEMENT MASONS LOCAL NO. 395 PENSION TRUST FUND; Arizona Laborers, Teamsters and Cement Masons Local No. 395 Defined Contribution Pension Trust Fund; Arizona Operating Engineers Defined Benefit Pension Trust Fund; Arizona Operating Engineers Defined Contribution Pension Tr

563 F.3d 276 (2009) INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 150, AFL-CIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph P. WARD, Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-1631. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued October 27, 2008. Decided April 16, 2009. *277 Bryan P. Diemer, Dale D. Pierson (argued), IUOE Local

787 F.2d 128 54 USLW 2527, 7 Employee Benefits Ca 1273 UNITED RETAIL & WHOLESALE EMPLOYEES TEAMSTERS UNION LOCALNO. 115 PENSION PLAN and Robert E. Zimmer, Michael Paolella,John P. Morris and James Smith, Jr., Trustees of the UnitedRetail & Wholesale Employees Teamsters Union Local No. 115Pension Plan, Appellees/Cross-Appellants,v.YAHN & Mc DONNELL, INC. and the Pennstar Company, Appel

OPINION OF THE COURT BECKER, Circuit Judge. This case presents three important questions concerning the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (“MPPAA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. (1982): 1) whether MPPAA authorizes a right of action to collect withdrawal liability payments pending arbitration proceedings at which employers withdrawing from the plan may challenge assessments of withdraw

MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting in Part and Denying in Part Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss; and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Petitioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court following the parties’ negotiat

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ) NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES ) UNION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 25-0935 (PLF)

828 F.2d 961 127 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3018, 107 Lab.Cas. P 10,204 Robert L. JOHNSON, Keith A. Smith, Richard E. Davis, AnnMcFadden, Wanda M. Anderson, and All OthersSimilarly Situated, Appellants,v.UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS, INTERNATIONAL UNIONLOCAL NO. 23, Formerly Local No. 590; Jack Draper; RichardJ. Lutz; United Food and Commercial Workers InternationalUnion, A.F.L.-C.I.O., C.L.C.;

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge Plaintiff Daniel Virtue is something of a collector. Over the course of his employment with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, with his local union, and as a rank-and-file Teamster, he has collected memberships in at least four Teamsters-affiliated pension plans. In this

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge. Plaintiff Daniel Virtue worked a series of jobs -with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters from October 2000 to January 2007. As a result of his service with the IBT, his local union, and as a rank-and-file Teamster, he was eligible to participate in at least four Teamsters-affiliated pension plans. When Virtue also sought to participate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DANIEL A. VIRTUE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 12-516 (JEB) INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS RETIREMENT AND FAMILY PROTECTION PLAN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Daniel Virtue worked a series of jobs with the International Bro

91 F.Supp.2d 797 (2000) Edward J. FOLEY, Sr., Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION 98 PENSION FUND, et. al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 98-906. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 29, 2000. *798 *799 Edward J. Foley, Jr., Philadelphia,

811 F.Supp.2d 1295 (2011) In re IRON WORKERS LOCAL 25 PENSION FUND. Case Nos. 04-cv-40243, 07-cv-12368. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 29, 2011. *1297 Sharon S. Almonrode, Michael J. Asher, Sullivan, Ward, Southfield, MI, for Iron Workers Local 25 Pension Fund. Eugene Driker, Morley Witus, S

OPINION & ORDER EDELSTEIN, District Judge: This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement of an action commenced by plaintiff United States of America (“the Government”) against, inter alia, defendants International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“the IBT” or “the Union”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14,1989 (“Consen

125 F.3d 1230 156 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2364, 97 Cal. Daily Op.Serv. 7215,97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7408,97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,982 SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, anunincorporated association; Carpenters Local1506, an unincorporated association;Does 1 through 100,Defendants-Appellants. N

BREYER, Circuit Judge. This case raises two difficult and important sets of questions concerning collective bargaining and rapid transit. First, can the Commonwealth of Massachusetts enact statutes that are inconsistent with assurances that its Transit Authority previously gave the Secretary of Labor as part of an application for federal grant money? Second, do those Massachusetts statutes unconstitutionally impair pre-existin

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 08-1631 INTERNATIONAL U NION OF O PERATING E NGINEERS, L OCAL 150, AFL-CIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOSEPH P. W ARD , Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, ef ai., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:17-cv-01215 (TNM) v. HEBREW HOMES HEALTH NETWORK, INC,, ef al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund (the “Fund’’) seeks to recover a total of $847,290.62 in required pension contributions that Defendants Hebrew Homes Health Network, Inc., Aventura Plaza, Inc

708 F.Supp. 1388 (1989) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, et al., Defendants. No. 88 Civ. 4486 (DNE). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 6, 1989. *1389 *1390 *1391 Rudolph W. Giuliani, U.S. Atty.