⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “TD&H, Inc.”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-05-10 · Published · cited 2× · 889 F.3d 920
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Jay Zola and Jeremiah Joseph Lowney (collectively, Zola), Tyler Verdieck, and Michael Sarbacker filed separate class-action complaints against TD Ameritrade, Inc., alleging various state-law claims. 1 The *922
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008-05-20 · Published · cited 7× · 554 F. Supp. 2d 77; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62712; 2008 WL 2123308
(2008) COMMERCE BANK & TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. TD BANKNORTH, INC., TD Bank Financial Group, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Commerce Bancorp, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-40054-FDS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 20, 2008. MEMORANDUM ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SAYLOR, District Judg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-12-04 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 06796
TD Bank, N.A. v A.H. Dental P.C. (2025 NY Slip Op 06796) TD Bank, N.A. v A.H. Dental P.C. 2025 NY Slip Op 06796 Decided on December 04, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008-05-07 · Published · cited 31× · 527 F.3d 1300; 86 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1769; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 9725; 2008 WL 1966704
527 F.3d 1300 (2008) DECISIONING.COM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., Macys.Com, Inc., Bloomingdale's, Inc., The Bon, Inc. (doing business as The Bon Marche), Burdines, Inc., Rich's Department Stores, Inc. (doing business as Rich's-Macy's, Lazarus and Goldsmith's), FDS Bank, Department Stores National Bank, FACS Group, Inc., and Federated Systems Group, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. Decisioning.Com, Inc., Plaint
District Court, S.D. New York · 2012-12-27 · Published · cited 5× · 484 B.R. 593; 2012 WL 6709266
MEMORANDUM JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. Ernst & Young Inc., a bankruptcy monitor and authorized foreign representative (the “Monitor”) for Oilsands Quest, Inc. (“Oilsands”) and certain of its subsidiaries, filed Verified Petitions for Recognition of Foreign Proceedings and Related Relief (the “Petitions”) pursuant to Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Monitor seeks 1) recognition of cert
District Court, S.D. New York · 2001-06-20 · Published · cited 2× · 148 F. Supp. 2d 289; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8203; 2001 WL 699070
148 F.Supp.2d 289 (2001) Tony H. HOFFMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. TD WATERHOUSE INVESTOR SERVICES, INC. and John H. Chapel, Defendants. No. 00CIV0958(MBM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 20, 2001. *290 James P. Bonner, Shalov Stone & Bonner, New York City,
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017-10-03 · Published · cited 0× · 805 S.E.2d 542
AFFIRMED.
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018-10-24 · Published · cited 0× · 819 S.E.2d 387
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of July 2018 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017-07-12 · Published · cited 1× · 171 A.3d 921
*922 OPINION BY JUDGE COHN JUBELIRER Gretchen G. Pettit (Pettit), who claims she is successor in interest to Jupiter Tavern, Inc. (Licensee), appeals from the June 20, 2016 Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County (common pleas) that denied Pettit’s appeal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-03-24 · Published · cited 1× · 192 A.D.3d 996; 145 N.Y.S.3d 95; 2021 NY Slip Op 01758
Laura Andrew, Inc. v Holub Enters., Inc. (2021 NY Slip Op 01758) Laura Andrew, Inc. v Holub Enters., Inc. 2021 NY Slip Op 01758 Decided on March 24, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State
Superior Court of Delaware · 2022-01-04 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE T&H BAIL BONDS, INC. ) et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) C.A. No. N14J-01761 V. ) ) PREFERRED INVESTMENT ) SERVICES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER On February 20, 2020, Plaintiff Floyd White (“White”) filed a Motion for Condemnation Order and Judgment against defendant/judgment debtor Preferred Investment Services, Inc. (“PISI”’).'! White was attempting to execute a judgment owed by PISI by attempting to collect PISI funds allegedly in the possession of
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015-04-16 · Published · cited 242× · 784 F.3d 154; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 6190; 2015 WL 1727613
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 14-3050 _____________ CRYSTAL BYRD; BRIAN BYRD, Individually, and on Behalf of all Similarly Situated Persons, Appellants v. AARON’S INC; ASPEN WAY ENTERPRISES INC, d/b/a Aaron’s Sales and Leasing, A Franchisee of
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018-06-19 · Published · cited 0× · 814 S.E.2d 924
DISMISSED.
Arizona Supreme Court · 2012-05-04 · Published · cited 59× · 275 P.3d 598; 229 Ariz. 299; 633 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 38; 2012 WL 1556654; 2012 Ariz. LEXIS 122
275 P.3d 598 (2012) BT CAPITAL, LLC, an Arizona limited liability corporation, Plaintiff/Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. TD SERVICE COMPANY OF ARIZONA, an Arizona corporation; and RCS-Chandler, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, Defendants/Appellees, and Point Center Financial, Inc., a foreign corporation, Defendant/Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. CV-11-0308-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-01-18 · Published · cited 1× · 2024 NY Slip Op 00252
Tour Cent. Park Inc. v Thor 38 Park Row LLC (2024 NY Slip Op 00252) Tour Cent. Park Inc. v Thor 38 Park Row LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 00252 Decided on January 18, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-01-18 · Published · cited 1× · 2024 NY Slip Op 00252
Tour Cent. Park Inc. v Thor 38 Park Row LLC (2024 NY Slip Op 00252) Tour Cent. Park Inc. v Thor 38 Park Row LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 00252 Decided on January 18, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting
Superior Court of Delaware · 2018-10-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SERVICES, INC., T&H BAIL BONDS, INC. et al., ) Assignee Floyd White ) ) Judgment Creditor, ) C.A. No. N14J-01 761 v. ) ) PREFERRED INVESTMENT ) ) ) ) Judgment Debtor. Subrnitted: September 12, 2018 Decided: October 30, 2018 Upon Judgment Debtor’s Motion for Reconsideration of Commissioner’s C)rder. DENIED. _(M Floyd White, New Castle, Delaware, pro se. E. Calvin Harmon, Jr., Esquire, Wilmington, Delaware, Attorney for Judgment Debtor Pre
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-04-17 · Published · cited 1× · 2024 NY Slip Op 02032
Air-Sea Packing Group, Inc. v Applied Underwriters, Inc. (2024 NY Slip Op 02032) Air-Sea Packing Group, Inc. v Applied Underwriters, Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 02032 Decided on April 17, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Miller, J. <
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016-03-18 · Published · cited 60× · 817 F.3d 56; 61 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1653; 2016 WL 1077009; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 5114
PER CURIAM: This case returns to the Court for the second time since 2013. After the September 2008 bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (“Lehman”), Plaintiffs-Appellants (“Plaintiffs”) brought suit on behalf of a putative class, of former participants in an employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”) invested exclusively in Lehman’s common stock. Plaintiffs alleged that Defendants-Appellees (“Plan Committee Defendants”
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2017-08-30 · Published · cited 0× · 576 B.R. 260
ORDER DENYING IN PART OMNIBUS MOTION OF PLAINTIFF AND SETTING HEARING THEREON Erik P. Kimball, Judge This matter comes before the Court on the omnibus motion in each of the above-*262captioned adversary proceedings [ECF No. 50, Adv. Proc. No. 16-01755-EPK; ECF No. 57, Adv. Proc. No. 16-01756-EPK; and ECF No. 40, Adv. Proc. No. 16-01757-EPK] (collec