Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “TD&H, Inc.”
Jay Zola v. TD Ameritrade, Inc.public domain
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Jay Zola and Jeremiah Joseph Lowney (collectively, Zola), Tyler Verdieck, and Michael Sarbacker filed separate class-action complaints against TD Ameritrade, Inc., alleging various state-law claims. 1 The *922
Commerce Bank & Trust Co. v. TD Banknorth, Inc.public domain
(2008) COMMERCE BANK & TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. TD BANKNORTH, INC., TD Bank Financial Group, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Commerce Bancorp, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-40054-FDS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 20, 2008. MEMORANDUM ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SAYLOR, District Judg
TD Bank, N.A. v. A.H. Dental P.C.public domain
TD Bank, N.A. v A.H. Dental P.C. (2025 NY Slip Op 06796) TD Bank, N.A. v A.H. Dental P.C. 2025 NY Slip Op 06796 Decided on December 04, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
527 F.3d 1300 (2008) DECISIONING.COM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., Macys.Com, Inc., Bloomingdale's, Inc., The Bon, Inc. (doing business as The Bon Marche), Burdines, Inc., Rich's Department Stores, Inc. (doing business as Rich's-Macy's, Lazarus and Goldsmith's), FDS Bank, Department Stores National Bank, FACS Group, Inc., and Federated Systems Group, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. Decisioning.Com, Inc., Plaint
Collins v. Oilsands Quest Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. Ernst & Young Inc., a bankruptcy monitor and authorized foreign representative (the “Monitor”) for Oilsands Quest, Inc. (“Oilsands”) and certain of its subsidiaries, filed Verified Petitions for Recognition of Foreign Proceedings and Related Relief (the “Petitions”) pursuant to Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Monitor seeks 1) recognition of cert
Hoffman v. TD Waterhouse Investor Services, Inc.public domain
148 F.Supp.2d 289 (2001) Tony H. HOFFMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. TD WATERHOUSE INVESTOR SERVICES, INC. and John H. Chapel, Defendants. No. 00CIV0958(MBM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 20, 2001. *290 James P. Bonner, Shalov Stone & Bonner, New York City,
Taylor v. Mystic Lands, Inc.public domain
AFFIRMED.
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of July 2018 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
*922 OPINION BY JUDGE COHN JUBELIRER Gretchen G. Pettit (Pettit), who claims she is successor in interest to Jupiter Tavern, Inc. (Licensee), appeals from the June 20, 2016 Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County (common pleas) that denied Pettit’s appeal
Laura Andrew, Inc. v. Holub Enters., Inc.public domain
Laura Andrew, Inc. v Holub Enters., Inc. (2021 NY Slip Op 01758) Laura Andrew, Inc. v Holub Enters., Inc. 2021 NY Slip Op 01758 Decided on March 24, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE T&H BAIL BONDS, INC. ) et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) C.A. No. N14J-01761 V. ) ) PREFERRED INVESTMENT ) SERVICES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER On February 20, 2020, Plaintiff Floyd White (“White”) filed a Motion for Condemnation Order and Judgment against defendant/judgment debtor Preferred Investment Services, Inc. (“PISI”’).'! White was attempting to execute a judgment owed by PISI by attempting to collect PISI funds allegedly in the possession of
Crystal Byrd v. Aaron's Incpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 14-3050 _____________ CRYSTAL BYRD; BRIAN BYRD, Individually, and on Behalf of all Similarly Situated Persons, Appellants v. AARON’S INC; ASPEN WAY ENTERPRISES INC, d/b/a Aaron’s Sales and Leasing, A Franchisee of
DISMISSED.
Bt Capital v. Td Service Co. of Arizonapublic domain
275 P.3d 598 (2012) BT CAPITAL, LLC, an Arizona limited liability corporation, Plaintiff/Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. TD SERVICE COMPANY OF ARIZONA, an Arizona corporation; and RCS-Chandler, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, Defendants/Appellees, and Point Center Financial, Inc., a foreign corporation, Defendant/Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. CV-11-0308-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc
Tour Cent. Park Inc. v. Thor 38 Park Row LLCpublic domain
Tour Cent. Park Inc. v Thor 38 Park Row LLC (2024 NY Slip Op 00252) Tour Cent. Park Inc. v Thor 38 Park Row LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 00252 Decided on January 18, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting
Tour Cent. Park Inc. v. Thor 38 Park Row LLCpublic domain
Tour Cent. Park Inc. v Thor 38 Park Row LLC (2024 NY Slip Op 00252) Tour Cent. Park Inc. v Thor 38 Park Row LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 00252 Decided on January 18, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SERVICES, INC., T&H BAIL BONDS, INC. et al., ) Assignee Floyd White ) ) Judgment Creditor, ) C.A. No. N14J-01 761 v. ) ) PREFERRED INVESTMENT ) ) ) ) Judgment Debtor. Subrnitted: September 12, 2018 Decided: October 30, 2018 Upon Judgment Debtor’s Motion for Reconsideration of Commissioner’s C)rder. DENIED. _(M Floyd White, New Castle, Delaware, pro se. E. Calvin Harmon, Jr., Esquire, Wilmington, Delaware, Attorney for Judgment Debtor Pre
Air-Sea Packing Group, Inc. v Applied Underwriters, Inc. (2024 NY Slip Op 02032) Air-Sea Packing Group, Inc. v Applied Underwriters, Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 02032 Decided on April 17, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Miller, J. <
Rinehart ex rel. Buzzo v. Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM: This case returns to the Court for the second time since 2013. After the September 2008 bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (“Lehman”), Plaintiffs-Appellants (“Plaintiffs”) brought suit on behalf of a putative class, of former participants in an employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”) invested exclusively in Lehman’s common stock. Plaintiffs alleged that Defendants-Appellees (“Plan Committee Defendants”
ORDER DENYING IN PART OMNIBUS MOTION OF PLAINTIFF AND SETTING HEARING THEREON Erik P. Kimball, Judge This matter comes before the Court on the omnibus motion in each of the above-*262captioned adversary proceedings [ECF No. 50, Adv. Proc. No. 16-01755-EPK; ECF No. 57, Adv. Proc. No. 16-01756-EPK; and ECF No. 40, Adv. Proc. No. 16-01757-EPK] (collec