Cases

SUTIN, Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I concur in the reversal of summary judgment in favor of defendant Pharmaseal. I dissent in the affirmance of summary judgment in favor of Dr. Burress and Presbyterian Hospital. The purpose of this dissent is not to declare defendants liable. That is not t

Opinion RAMIREZ, P. J. —Having read and considered the petition, the informal response we requested, and additional briefing as described below, as well as the record provided by both parties, we conclude the petition lacks merit. Our order requesting an informal response notified the parties that ‘“[t]he court

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced declaratory judgment action, alleging breach of contract, conversion, and unjust enrichment/money had and received, arising out of Defendants’ alleged efforts to deprive Plaintiff Moreno Energy, Inc. (“Moreno”), a citizen of Texas, of substantial portions of its overriding royalty interest in the

JULIE A. ROBINSON, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff-Relator Michele Coffman filed this qui tam action against Defendant the City of Leavenworth, Kansas ("the City"), alleging that it committed fraud on the federal government by making a false claim for reimbursement to the Federal Emergency Management Agency ("FEMA") and fraudulently billing federal agencies for sewage service. This matter is before the Court on the par

133 F.Supp.2d 1164 (2000) Tito ALVARENGA-VILLALOBOS, Petitioner, v. Janet RENO, Attorney General of the United States, and Charles H Demore, District Director, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondents. No. C-00-4291 VRW. United States District Court, N.D. California. December 22, 2000. *1165 Frank P. Sprouls, Ricc

ORDER CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO, District Judge. Having considered the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, and/or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 filed by petitioner Jaime Pinillos-Prieto (Pinillos) (docket entry 1), the United States’ Response in Opposition (docket entry 4), and the Report and Recommendation (R & R) issued by U.S. Magistrate-Judge Justo Arenas on July 29, 2013 (docket entry 24), whi

325 F.Supp.2d 778 (2004) Vladamir LEMESHKO, Petitioner, v. Philip WRONA, Respondent. No. 03-CV-72042-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. April 9, 2004. *779 *780 Nancy B. Pridgen, United States Attorney's Office, Detroit, MI, for Defendant. OR

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF, District Judge. The plaintiffs’ complaint alleges a claim for unpaid wages and injunctive relief under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219. The plaintiffs allege defendant Cargill Meat Solutions, Corporation (“Cargill”) has violated and continues to violate the FLSA by requiring non-exempt employees at Cargill’s facility at Schuyler, Nebraska t

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, filed March 23, 2018 (Doc. 27)("MTD"). The Court held a hearing on August 10, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the applicable statutes of limitations bar Plaintiff Janice Nowell's claims against Defendants Medtronic Inc., Covidien PLC, Covidien LP, and Medtronic PLC for negligence, strict

TURNER, P. J., Concurring and Dissenting. I agree wholeheartedly with those portions of my colleagues’ conclusions that: the present case involves an issue of assignment of counsel, not relieving an attorney (Alexander v. Superior Court (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 901, 914 [27 Cal.Rptr.2d 732]); resolution of the present petition is subject to the deferential abuse of discretion standar

30 F.3d 1106 Francisco NARANJO-AGUILERA; Candelario Orozco-Macias;Juventino Tafolla-Ramirez; Hector Orozco-Flores;Celestino Gaona,Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants,v.U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE; William P. Barr,in his official capacity as Attorney General ofthe United States,Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Nos. 92-16653, 92-16933. Unit

Opinion by Judge FLETCHER. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: This is a class action challenge to Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) interpretations of a provision of the Special Agricultural Workers legalization program created by the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), as amended by the Immigration Nursing Relief Act of 1989 (INRA). The class members are immigrant agricultural workers who

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 440 TX[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 441 TX[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE

ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE