Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Ruben Castillo, Chief Judge • Tonya Davis (“Plaintiff”) brings this action against Ernest B. Fenton, the Law Office of Ernest B. Fenton, P.C. (“the Law Office”), and Legal Services, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging violations of' the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq., and the- Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1982; attorney ma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. Monica McLamore, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-cv-1274 (TSC) WINN COMPANIES d/b/a Winn Properties, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff-Relator Monica McLamore brings this F

MEMORANDUM OPINION TANYA S. CHUTKAN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Electronic Privacy Information Center (“EPIC”) moves this Court for an award of fees and costs arising out of the instant Freedom of Information Act Complaint. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants in part and denies in part EPIC’s Motion (ECF No. 15).

637 F.3d 508 (2011) In re FAMILY DOLLAR FLSA LITIGATION. Irene Grace; Sharron Daugherty; John A. Gertken; Dusty G. Hylton; Lasandra B. Rose; Phillis Fancher; Jodi Hare; Angela J. Cooper; Melvin Cathey; Mark Clark; John E. Gersch; Margie A. Little; Vicki Brown Guy; Brenda Kay Russell, a/k/a Brenda K. Russell-Stain; Barbara G. Brown; Marcella San Giorgio; Brian K. Backlund; James Manos; Arlene Atkins; Tracy Kloppe; Sandra Carney; Catherine M. Dawson; A

ORDER FERNANDO J. GAITAN, JR., District Judge. Pending before the Court are (1) State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike and Request for Oral Argument (Doc. No. 21); (2) Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File.Second Amended Complaint and Motion to Stay Ruling on Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 25); and (3) State Farm’s Motion for Leave to File SurReply in

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00378-CV DAVID J. KANTNER AND WIFE, APPELLANTS SHERI K. KANTNER, JON D. MATHE, DAVID MOORE, AND WIFE, SYLVIA MOORE, AND MICHAEL MORRIS AND WIFE, KIM MORRIS V. CHESAPEAKE ENERGY APPELLEES CORPORATION AND CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, LLC

02-11-378--390-CV_COR

871 N.E.2d 914 (2007) The ESTATE OF William BASS, Deceased, and by and through its Independent Coexecutor Edward BASS; Edward Bass, Individually; Lyle B. Streicher; and Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. Melvin L. KATTEN; Katten Muchin Zavis Rosenman, a Professional Corporation; Lizabeth N. Horn, Linda L. Miller; Harvey M. Silets; David M. Kushnir; Deloitte Touche, L.L.P.; Paul Anglin; Jam

515 F.Supp.2d 25 (2007) Deborah D. PETERSON, Personal Representative of the Estate of James C. Knipple (Dec.), et al., Plaintiffs, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 01-2094 (RCL), 01-2684(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 7, 2007. *26

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CLAUDIA WILKEN, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Competition takes many forms. Although this case raises questions about athletic competition on the football field and the basketball court, it is principally about the rules governing competition in a different arena — namely, the marketplace. Plaintiffs are a group

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA

211 F.Supp.2d 81 (2002) UNITED STATES of America v. Anthony WIGGINS, Defendant. No. Crim.A. 98-409(EGS). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 20, 2002. Charles Joseph Harkins, Jr., Amy Jeanne Conway, Julius Rothstein, Anthony Barkow, U.S. Attorney's office, Washington, DC, for U.S. Erica Hashimoto, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Washin

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi

■ FUENTES, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judges Sloviter, Alito and Smith join, dissenting. In this case, the majority interprets the phrase “the trustee may,” in § 544(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, to mean that the trustee and a creditors’ committee may seek recovery under the statute. Although the majority does not conclude that the phrase is ambiguous or that its meaning is in any way obscure,

406 F.Supp.2d 954 (2005) Edward NOWAK, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL TRUCK AND ENGINE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation doing business in Illinois Defendant. No. 03 C 4971. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 19, 2005. *955 *956

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA25-181 Filed 4 April 2025 Wake County, Nos. 24CV40619-910, 24CV040620-910, 24CV40622-910 JEFFERSON GRIFFIN, Petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, Respondent, and ALLISON RIGGS, Intervenor-Respondent. Appeal by petitioner from orders entered 7 February 2025 by Judge William R. Pittman in Wake County Supe

192 F.Supp.2d 1124 (2001) Richard R. CASTALDO, Dominic R. Castaldo and Connie Michalik, Plaintiffs, v. Jefferson County Sheriff John C. STONE, individually and in his official capacity, Former Jefferson County Sheriff Ronald Beckham, individually and in his official capacity, Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, Neil Gardner, individually, John Hicks, individually, Mark M. Miller, individually, Tanya Williams, individually, Mike Guerra, individ

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF CERTAIN ATTORNEYS FOR FAILURE TO PAY ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES and/or FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS RANDALL T. SHEPARD, Chief Justice. The Clerk of the Court has notified this Court that certain attorneys have failed either to pay the annual registration fee required for them to be lieensed to practice law in Indiana, or to file an exemption affidavit as contem

909 N.E.2d 415 (2009) In the Matter of FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS and/or NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES. No. 94S00-0905-MS-210. Supreme Court of Indiana. May 5, 2009. ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF CERTAIN ATTORNEYS FOR FAILURE TO PAY ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES and/or FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIRE

MORAN, Senior District Judge. Plaintiffs-appellants are current and former New York City correction officers and captains. They appeal from a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Rakoff, J.) dismissing with prejudice their consolidated challenge to the sick leave policy of the New York City Department of Correction (“DOC”). Embodied in DOC Directive 2262, the policy permits an eligible office