Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NICOLAS TALBOTT, et al, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-cv-00240 (ACR) UNITED STATES, et al, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendants ask the Court to dissolve, or stay pending appeal, the preliminary injunction it ent

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NICOLAS TALBOTT, et al, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-cv-00240 (ACR) UNITED STATES, et al, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendants ask the Court to dissolve, or stay pending appeal, the preliminary injunction it ent

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NICOLAS TALBOTT, et al, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-cv-00240 (ACR) UNITED STATES, et al, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In Executive Order No. 14183, President Donald J. Trump focuses on “Prioritizing Military Excellence and

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 25-5087 September Term, 2025 1:25-cv-00240-ACR Filed On: December 9, 2025 Nicolas Talbott, et al., Appellees v. United States of

On March 23, 2018, Defendants Donald J. Trump ("President Trump"), in his official capacity as President of the United States; James N. Mattis, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense; Joseph F. Dunford, Jr., in his official capacity as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; Richard V. Spencer, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy; Ryan D. McCarthy, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Army; Heather A. Wilson, in her offi

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 22, 2026 Decided June 1, 2026 No. 25-5087 NICHOLAS TALBOTT, ET AL., PLAINTIFF-APPELLEES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 26-1169 (JDB) v. DONALD TRUMP et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER The American Historical Association and American Oversight have brought suit against a bevy of federal def

RENDERED: JUNE 20, 2025 TO BE PUBLISHED Supreme Court of Kentucky 2023-SC-0124-MR EARL K. JOHNSON APPELLANT ON APPEAL FROM LOGAN CIRCUIT COURT V. HONORABLE JOE W. HENDRICKS, JR., JUDGE NO. 19-CR-00158 COMMONWEALTH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-9, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 25-cv-325 (JMC) v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AGENTS ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 25-cv-328 (JMC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAKE THE ROAD NEW YORK, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 25-cv-190 (JMC) v. KRISTI NOEM, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION For nearly three decades, the

23 F.Supp.2d 658 (1998) Paul R. PIAZZA, v. Jeff MAYNE. No. CIV. A. 97-238. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. October 29, 1998. *659 Galen S. Brown, M. Lizabeth Talbott, Lamothe & Hamilton, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff. Lionel Joseph Favret, III, Leake & Andersson, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant. <

490 S.E.2d 754 (1997) 200 W.Va. 667 Ward W. KEESECKER, II, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Walter M. BIRD, Committee for Emily Keesecker, and Arch Steiner, Committee for Emily Keesecker, Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 23386. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted February 4, 1997. Decided July 14, 1997.

601 F.3d 329 (2010) Anthony TODD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STEAMSHIP MUTUAL UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION (BERMUDA) LIMITED, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-30177. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. March 18, 2010. *330 William Steven Mannear (argued), Poynter, Mannear & Co., P.L.C., Baton Rouge, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.<

124 F.Supp.2d 788 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Ivette RIVERA MALDONADO, Defendant. No. CRIM.95-0390(HL). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. December 20, 2000. *789 Warren Vazquez, Asst. U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office District of P.R., San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Lydia Lizarribar-Buxo, S

MEMORANDUM OPINION NORMAN K. MOON, District Judge. Plaintiffs, all prisoners residing at Flu-vanna Correctional Center for Women (“FCCW”), a facility of the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections (the ‘VDOC”), filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Defendants1 violated Plaintiffs’ constitutional rights under the Eighth Amendment to

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 664 OPINION This is an appeal from an order denying Plaintiffs-Appellants' motion for new trial. Plaintiffs, Ronald Martin, James Muller, Aaron Anderson, and Todd Meyer, were injured in an explosion and fire that occurred on June 28, 1994, at Apartment 3d 1901 H

SEITZ, Chief Judge, concurring. I agree with the majority that the district court’s order is appealable under Perlman v. United States, 247 U.S. 7, 38 S.Ct. 417, 62 L.Ed. 950 (1918), and subsequent cases interpreting that opinion. I also agree that the CBS materials cannot at this time be obtained by a rule 17(c) subpoena, except to the extent that they may be used for impeachment purposes after t

Opinion issued August 20, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00846-CV ——————————— DAVID GORDON SCHMIDT D/B/A ABC BONDING COMPANY AND GREENBRIER EQUITIES, LLC, Appellants V. BRENDA CRAWFORD, CARLOS PERE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PERKINS COIE LLP, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-716 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge, dissenting. My colleagues hold that, after Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), judicial application of the Sentencing Guidelines violates the defendant’s right to trial by jury under the sixth amendment. I disagree with that holding on both procedural and substantive grounds. This is the wrong forum for such a conclusion; and whatever po