Cases

This is an original proceeding in this court brought by Gulf Oil Corporation, hereinafter referred to as petitioner, to obtain a review of an award which was made and entered on December 7, 1942, by a trial commissioner of the State Industrial Commission in favor of Loren Donald Kyes, hereinafter referred to as respondent. The sufficiency of the notice of injury given by the respondent and of the evidence to establish disability as the result of an accidental injury are the principal i

Grant, J. {after stating the facts). 1. The defend*283ant does not contend that there was no evidence o£ negligence on the part of the defendant, but upon the trial insisted and requested the court to instruct the jury that the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence. It is insisted that he continued to work in this dangerous posit

Thomson, J., delivered the opinion of the court. Action for malicious prosecution. The plaintiff had judgment, and the defendant appealed. *191The complaint was that on the 7th day of April, 1893, the defendant falsely, maliciously, unlawfully, wrongfully, and without reasonable or probable cause, commenced a criminal prosecution aga

Thomson, J., delivered the opinion of the court. Action for malicious prosecution. The plaintiff had judgment, and the defendant appealed. *191The complaint was that on the 7th day of April, 1893, the defendant falsely, maliciously, unlawfully, wrongfully, and without reasonable or probable cause, commenced a criminal prosecution aga

OPINION OF THE COURT (June 16, 2016) HODGE, Chief Justice. John Cianci and Thomas Chaput (collectively referred to as “sons”), initiated a petition for guardianship and conservatorship over their father, Robert Chaput, on October 9, 2012. During the pendency of that proceeding —■ after the Superior Court had held multiple hearings but before it entered its final order — Chaput filed

For Publication IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS EUPHITA O HACKETT ) S Ct Civ N0 2020 0029 Appellant/Defendant ) Re Super Ct Civ No 538 2002 (STX) ) V ) ) HARRIETT

DUNSTON, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 8, 2016) Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants’ Motion for Extension of Time will be granted, while their Motion to Dismiss will be granted in part as to Plaintiff’s claims for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, but denied wi

OPINION OF THE COURT (February 24, 2017) Swan, Associate Justice. Appellant, Dale Dupigny, seeks reversal of a November 15, 2013 order of the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands *438affirming a child support award on writ of review from the Department of Justice’s Division of Paternity and Child Support (“PCS”). Dupigny ar

OPINION OF THE COURT (July 20, 2015) HODGE, Chief Justice. Hoda Fathi Yusuf Hamed1 appeals from the Superior Court’s January 31, 2014 order, which dismissed her petition for divorce. Because the parties’ failure to obtain a license prior to having their marriage solemnized did not render their marriage void or voidable, we reverse. I. B

DONOHUE, Presiding Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (May 28, 2013) THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Raphael Panilla’s competency to stand trial. For the following reasons, the Court finds that the Defendant does not presently possess the necessary capacity, ability or knowledge to assist in his own defense or understand the proceedings against him. Pursuant to this determin

OPINION OF THE COURT (February 1, 2016) PER curiam. Appellant Kye Walker, Esq., appeals from the Superior Court’s May 21, 2015 opinion and order, which held her in criminal contempt for remarks she made at a May 8, 2013 hearing. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment below. *338I. BACKGROUND

WESTBROOKS, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. This action derives from a civil suit filed by minor Jane Doe, 1 individually, against the Holmes County School District (HCSD) under the Mississippi Tort Claims Act (MTCA) in the Holmes County Circuit Court. HCSD filed a motion to dismiss alleging that the statute of limita

For Publication [N THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS FRANCISCO ANTONIO AGUEDA a/k/a ) S Ct Civ No 2020 0030 FRANCISCO AGUEDA ) Re Super Ct Cw No 375 2014(STX) Appellant/Defendant ) ) v )

WILLOCKS, Administrative Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (April 8, 2015) THIS MATTER is in the Appellate Division of the Superior Court based on a petition for review Beatrice Ramos filed on behalf of her business, Wild Orchid Floral & Event Design.1 Wild Orchid, the plaintiff in the Magistrate Division and the petitioner on internal appeal to the Appellate

GÓMEZ, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (February 7, 2017) Before the Court is (1) the complaint filed by Kevin A. Rodriquez against the 32nd Legislature of the Virgin Islands and Senator Myron Jackson bearing Civil Case No. 17-3 (the “Federal Action”); and (2) the *829complaint filed by Janelle K. Sarauw and Brigitte Berry aga

GÓMEZ, Chief United States District Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (July 17, 2013) Before the Court is the motion of the plaintiff, Shorn Joseph, for attorneys’ fees and costs. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This case arises out of an employment dispute between the plaintiff, Shorn Joseph (“Joseph”), and the defendants, the Government of

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-297 No. COA21-99 Filed 3 May 2022 Gaston County, No. 17 CRS 63798 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. MARQUIS JULIUS GRAHAM, Defendant. Appeal by Defendant from judgment entered 19 February 2020 by Judge David A. Phillips in Gaston County Superior Court. H

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-297 No. COA21-99 Filed 3 May 2022 Gaston County, No. 17 CRS 63798 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. MARQUIS JULIUS GRAHAM, Defendant. Appeal by Defendant from judgment entered 19 February 2020 by Judge David A. Phillips in Gaston County Superior Court. H

TERRENCE LEON ATTORNEY AT LAW HOLMES FILED IN 455 Milam Street 1st COURT OF APPEALS Beaumont, Texas 77701-4914

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2653 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Antione Deandre Maxwell lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ___________________________ No. 22-2655 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllll