Cases

[Cite as Mentor Way Real Estate Partnership, 2016-Ohio-4692.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 103267 MENTOR WAY REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.

404 F.Supp.2d 540 (2005) Joseph ACHTMAN, Shirley Achtman, Blair Ambach, Theodore Andreozzi, Sondra Baer-Miller for the Estate of Jenny Baer, Sandy Berkowitz, Joseph Berlinger, Elissa Berlinger, Gustave Birnberg, Faith Birnberg, George Cagen, Yvette Cohen, Selma Dauber, Martin Dauber, Isabel Ezersky, Paul Ezersky, Dorothy Feigenbaum, Richard Flynn, Individually, and Richard Flynn for the Estate of Herbert Flynn, Dorothy Gaston, Erwin Gaston, Gunther Glase

336 F.Supp.2d 336 (2004) Joseph ACHTMAN, Shirley Achtman, Blair Ambach, Theodore Andreozzi, Sondra Baer-Miller for the Estate of Jenny Baer, Sandy Berkowitz, Joseph Berlinger, Elissa Berlinger, Gustave Birnberg, Faith Birnberg, George Cagen, Yvette Cohen, Selma Dauber, Martin Dauber, Isabel Ezersky, Paul Ezersky, Dorothy Feigenbaum, Richard Flynn, Individually, and Richard Flynn for the Estate of Herbert Flynn, Dorothy Gaston, Erwin Gaston, Gunther Glase

464 F.3d 328 Joseph ACHTMAN, Shirley Achtman, Blair Ambach, Theodore Andreozzi, Sondra Baer-Miller, for the estate of Jenny Baer, Sandy Berkowitz, Joseph Berlinger, Elissa Berlinger, Gustave Birnberg, Faith Birnberg, George Cagen, Yvette Cohen, Selma Dauber, Martin Dauber, Isabel Ezersky, Paul Ezersky, Dorothy Feigenbaum, Richard Flynn, individually and for the estate of Herbert Flynn, Dorothy Gatson, Erwin Gatson, Gunther Glaser, Grace Gluck, Saul

242 Pa. Superior Ct. 125 (1976) 363 A.2d 1192 Marjorie H. MATSON and Sylvia S. Sales, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. PARKING SERVICE CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania Corporation, et al., Appellants, (three cases), and the City of Pittsburgh, a Municipal Corporation; and the Public Parking Authority of Pittsburgh, a Municipal Corporation. Appeal of JOSEPH HORNE COMPANY. Appeal of GIMBEL BR

Lenk, J. This matter is before us on the appeal of the husband, Brian Buckley, from the February 3, 1995, post-divorce judgments of the Probate and Family Court, modifying the parties’ judgment of divorce nisi pursuant to G. L. c. 208, § IB, entered on August 1, 1990. The modification judgments award the wife, Patricia Buckley, alimony and do not require her to pay child support. At issue is whether the wife’s request fo

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State ex rel. Edelweiss Fund, LLC v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. (A-60-24) (090285) Argued April 27, 2026 -- Decided July 16, 2026 JUSTICE PIERRE-LOUIS, writing for a unanimous Court. Here, the Court considers w

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 23-1223 _____________ SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC.; SMITH & WESSON SALES CO.; SMITH & WESSON INC. Appellants v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs brought a putative class action against their former attorneys, Kirby, Mclnerney & Squire, LLP (“Kirby”) and Bernstein, Litowitz, Berger & Grossman, *331LLP (“Bernstein”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sprizzo, J.). Both firms had served as class counsel in a separate ea

SUMMARY ORDER IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, *14AND DECREED that this matter is REMANDED to the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sprizzo, J.) pursuant to the procedure outlined in Franceskin v. Credit Suisse, 214 F.3d 253, 259-60 (2d Cir.2000). This case comes before us because on September 17, 200

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. The question presented on this appeal is whether the Chief Administrator of the Courts has authority to assign Judges and Justices of one court to serve temporarily in another court under article VI (§ 26, subd i) of the Constitution of the State of New York when no standards or administrative policies for such transfers have been established in the manner prescribed

PER CURIAM: Table of Contents I. Background............................................................1193 A. Historical and Regulatory Setting...................................1193 B. Orders 497 and 497-A...............................................1194 1. Standards of Conduct.......................................

969 F.2d 1187 297 U.S.App.D.C. 187, 133 P.U.R.4th 606 TENNECO GAS, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,Amoco Production Company, ANR Pipeline Company, Arco Oil andGas Company, a Division of Atlantic Richfield Company,Arkla, Inc., Associated Natural Gas Company, a Division ofArkansas Western Gas Company, Association of TexasIntrastate Natural Gas Pipelines, Colorado G