Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Swartwood v. Swartwood”
Swartwood v. County of San Diegopublic domain
ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. 42]; (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS [DOC. 45]; AND (3) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST THE COUNTY DEFENDANTS [DOC. 46] THOMAS J. WHELAN, District Judge. Plaintiffs are Steven and
Bank of New Glarus v. Swartwoodpublic domain
725 N.W.2d 944 (2006) 2006 WI App 224 The BANK OF NEW GLARUS a Wisconsin Banking Corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Clarence Allen SWARTWOOD, Kathy Swartwood and John Doe and Jane Doe, Defendants, Ameriquest Mortgage Company, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2005AP647. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on Briefs September 15, 2005.
LCI International v. Margo Swartwoodpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON ________________________________________ LCI INTERNATIONAL, Vs. Plaintiff-Appellant, FILED Gibson Circuit No. 7423 C.A. No. W1999-02312-COA-R3-CV January 13
Vaughan v. Swartwoodpublic domain
996 F.2d 303 Vaughanv.Swartwood NO. 92-7712 United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. May 28, 1993 1 Appeal From: W.D.N.Y. 2 AFFIRMED.
Swartwood v. Commonwealthpublic domain
Opinion by Judge Wilkinson, Jr., This is an appeal from an adjudication of the Environmental Hearing Board (Board) affirming the decision of the Department of Environmental Resources (Department) which affirmed the decision of the Falls Township Board of Supervisors (Supervisors) to supplement the Official Sewage Facilities Plan (Official Plan) of Falls Township (Township) pursuant to the Pennsylvania Sewage Fa
McChesney v. Swartwoodpublic domain
Application for a writ of mandamus denied, wdthout costs. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Mahoney, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
Swartwood v. Burlington Northern, Inc.public domain
TÜRSI, Judge. In this wrongful death action brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), defendant, Burlington Northern, Inc., (Burlington) appeals the jury’s award of $800,000 to plaintiff, Alison M. Swart-wood, as personal representative of her deceased husband, Darwyn L. Swartwood. Burlington contends that the court erroneously prevented introduction of evidence of plaintiff’s remarriage or her curr
Simpson v. Swartwoodpublic domain
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (brought on in this court [CPLR 506, subd (b), par 1]) seeking, inter alia, to prohibit respondents from taking further action to enforce the order of Supreme Court, Tioga County, directing petitioner to prosecute the misdemeanor charge in People v Frank L. Dean by indictment in the County Court of Tioga County. In his decision on respondent Dean’s motion for divestiture, the respondent Swartwood foun
307 So.2d 631 (1975) LANDRY & PASSMAN REALTY INC. v. BEADLE, SWARTWOOD, WALL AND ASSOCIATES, INC., et al. No. 55785. Supreme Court of Louisiana. February 7, 1975. Writ refused. No error of law. SUMMERS, J., concurs.
In re: Carson Davis, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 303 So.2d 761. Writ refused. No error of law. SUMMERS, J., concurs.
Krause v. Swartwoodpublic domain
1 Reported in 218 N.W. 555. Certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission denying compensation. *Page 148 At the time of her alleged injury relator was employed in the office of the respondent Dr. F. A. Swartwood at Waseca. Her duties were those of office assistant and secretary to a physician and surgeon. Her "noon hour" was fr
In Re Swartwood Welsher Estatespublic domain
In the course of a probate proceeding involving the joint administration of two estates, the administrator filed a claim on behalf of himself and *Page 558 another claimant against the consolidated estates, seeking to have certain real property, which had been inventoried therein, conveyed to the claimants in specific performance of a prior oral agreement alleged to have been had with a former owner of the property; or otherwise, to have the remainder of
Swartwood v. Chancepublic domain
Sherwin, J.— Prior to January 4, 1905, Roy A. Swartwood, the plaintiff’s ward, was the owner of eighty acres of land, which was then of the value of from $3,200 to $3,600. The eighty was incumbered by a mortgage of *715$2,000 on which there was $100 interest dne. About said date Swartwood traded his equity in the land to the defendant on a valuation of $4,000 for the land
Swartwood v. Sagepublic domain
Per Curiam: Jerome E. Sage recovered judgment in the district court upon a note and mortgage executed by Helmuth Weber and wife. Weber had died before the action was brought, and his heirs, some of whom were minors, were made defendants. The guardian of the minors was also made a defendant in that capacity. No guardian ad litem was appointed. The only argument presented for reversing the
Swartwood v. Lehigh Valley Railroadpublic domain
Per, Curiam,. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6.
Cargill Commission Co. v. Swartwoodpublic domain
Stone, J. Action on a written contract of guaranty. Verdict for defendants and appeal by plaintiff from the denial of its blended motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial. The trial was had before Honorable Arthur B. Childress, former judge of the Fifth judicial district. The motion for judgment or a new trial did not come on for hearing until after his retirement
Swartwood v. Walbridgepublic domain
■ Dwight, P. J. This was an action of assault and battery. The defendant was the trustee of a school-district in which the plaintiff had been for some time employed as the teacher of the school. The alleged assault was committed by the defendant in resisting an attempt by the plaintiff to force an entrance *863into the school-house, for the purpose, as she declared, of ta
Swartwood v. Lehigh Valley Railroadpublic domain
Woodward, J.: This is an action brought to recover damages for the death of one Harleigh Swartwood, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. The case is pleaded with great prolixness, but it seems to have been tried upon the theory that it came within the provisions of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (35 U. S. Stat. at Large, 65, chap. 149, as amd. by 36 id. 291, chap. 143), which was pleaded among
Swartwood v. Wooleverpublic domain
Decree of the surrogate of Tompkins county reversed and a *641new trial ordered at the circuit of Tompkins county, with costs of this appeal to abide the final award of costs by the surrogate. Order may be settled by Justice Vann. Opinion by Vann, J
Swartwood v. Lehigh Valley Railroadpublic domain
Motion denied.