⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Swanson v. Boston Scientific Corporation”

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977-06-13 · Published · cited 171× · 555 F.2d 862
555 F.2d 862 180 U.S.App.D.C. 390, 1977-2 Trade Cases 61,811 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellant,v.TEXACO, INC.FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellant,v.STANDARD OIL COMPANY.FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellant,v.The SUPERIOR OIL COMPANY, INC., a corporation.FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellant,v.EXXON CORPORATION, a corporation.FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellant,v.SH
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996-12-19 · Published · cited 210× · 102 F.3d 1273; 27 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20622; 43 ERC (BNA) 1824; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33128; 1996 WL 720191
BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge. The defendant-intervenor Loon Mountain Recreation Corporation (“Loon Corp.”) operates a ski resort in the White Mountain National Forest in Lincoln, New Hampshire. In order to expand its skiing facilities, Loon Corp. sought and received a permit to do so from the United States Forest Service. 1 </
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998-05-04 · Published · cited 78× · 143 F.3d 515; 98 Daily Journal DAR 4577; 28 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21247; 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3305; 46 ERC (BNA) 1551; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 8551
143 F.3d 515 46 ERC 1551, 28 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,247,98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3305,98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4577 SOUTHWEST CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, a non-profitcorporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,Arizona Power Authority; Metropolitan Water District ofSouthern California; Southern Nevada Water Authority; SaltRiver Valley Water Users Association; Salt River ProjectAgricultural Improvement
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016-06-23 · Published · cited 13× · 197 F. Supp. 3d 1026; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81789; 2016 WL 3444191
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: Terence and Sherry Laverty1 have sued Smith & Nephew, Inc., asserting tort claims under Illinois law for negligence, strict products liability, and loss of consortium. Smith & Nephew has moved for partial judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). For the rea
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2024-10-11 · Published · cited 0×
RENDERED: OCTOBER 11, 2024; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2023-CA-0649-MR COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF WORKPLACE STANDARDS, EDUCATION AND LABOR CABINET APPELLANT APPEAL FROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE PHILLIP J. SHEPHERD, JUDGE ACTION NO. 22
California Court of Appeal · 2016-04-29 · Published · cited 9× · 247 Cal. App. 4th 1; 202 Cal. Rptr. 3d 68; 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 347
Opinion DONDERO, J. Plaintiff Ashley Glennen sued defendant Allergan, Inc. (Allergan), 1 alleging she suffered complications after Allergan’s LAP-BAND Adjustable Gastric Banding System (Lap-Band) was surgically implanted in her body. She appeals from the judgment rendered after the trial court sustain
Poe v. Drummondpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-08-06 · Published · cited 0×
Appellate Case: 23-5110 Document: 248-1 Date Filed: 08/06/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 6, 2025
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021-01-27 · Published · cited 12× · 986 F.3d 482
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1391 DOROTHY E. SMITH, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Julian Jackson Smith, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCHLAGE LOCK COMPANY, LLC, Defendant - Appellee, and AMETEK, INC., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Haveg
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016-10-19 · Published · cited 8× · 215 F. Supp. 3d 140; 95 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1794; 101 Fed. R. Serv. 1001; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145545; 129 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1180; 2016 WL 6134123
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Casper, United States District Judge I. Introduction Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has filed this lawsuit against Defendants Texas Roadhouse, Inc., Texas Roadhouse Holdings LLC and Texas Roadhouse Management Corp. (collectively, “Texas Roadhouse”) alleging a pattern or practice of age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employmen
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-06-15 · Published · cited 2× · 321 F. Supp. 3d 206
MEMORANDUM & ORDER YOUNG, D.J. I. INTRODUCTION This is a securities class action on behalf of persons and entities who purchased Acacia Communications, Inc. common stock. Lead plaintiffs WKW Partners Fund I, L.P. ("WKW Partners"), Hui Zhang ("Zhang"), and Chris Kebler ("Kebler"), together with plaintiff Rina Rollhaus ("Rollhaus" and collectively with WKW Partners, Zhang, a
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015-08-27 · Published · cited 30× · 800 F.3d 936; 2015 WL 5042248
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Security National Bank .of Sioux City, Iowa, acting as conservator for minor J.M.K., brought this products liability action against Abbott Laboratories, alleging *938 that Abbott’s baby formula caused permanent brain damage to J.M.K. After the trial jury found in favor of Abbo
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012-08-13 · Published · cited 120× · 688 F.3d 1342; 104 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1001; 2012 WL 3264508; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 16904
DYK, Circuit Judge, concurring. I agree with the majority that deference is owed to the jury’s implied findings in support of its nonobviousness verdict for the reasons ably set forth in the majority opinion. However, I write separately because, in my view, the majority errs in its construction of the “healing” limitations of these claims. Because the jury was not properly instructed on claim constructi
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023-07-18 · Published · cited 11× · 77 F.4th 787
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 16, 2022 Decided July 18, 2023 No. 20-5008 AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, APPELLEE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., APPELLEES SODA MOUNTAIN WILDERNESS COUNCIL, ET AL., APPELLANTS Consolidated with 20-5009, 20-5010, 20-5011, 22-5019,
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2022-12-15 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LEBANON COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ ) RETIREMENT FUND and TEAMSTERS ) LOCAL 443 HEALTH SERVICES & ) INSURANCE PLAN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2022-12-15 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LEBANON COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ ) RETIREMENT FUND and TEAMSTERS ) LOCAL 443 HEALTH SERVICES & ) INSURANCE PLAN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.
District Court, D. Vermont · 1997-08-12 · Published · cited 5× · 975 F. Supp. 576; 48 Fed. R. Serv. 115; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12142; 1997 WL 467029
975 F.Supp. 576 (1997) Ethel JUGLE, Administrator of the Estate of Jay G. Jugle, Ethel Jugle, individually and as Mother and next-of-kin of Jay G. Jugle, Plaintiffs, v. VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant. No. 2:93-CV-151. United States District Court, D. Vermont. August 12, 1997. *577 Gary W. Lange, Swanson & Lange, Burli
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018-11-15 · Published · cited 0× · 366 F. Supp. 3d 1234
James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendant the United States of America's oral objection to hearsay contained in America Indian oral tradition evidence testimony of Jemez Pueblo member Paul Tosa, and (ii) the Plaintiff Pueblo of Jemez's Memorandum of Law: Native American Oral Traditional Evidence at 1, filed October 29, 2018 (Doc. 320)("Oral Evidence Mem
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-12-21 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY; No. 19-72109 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, EPA No. 62719-625 Petitioners, OPINION v. MICHAEL S. REGAN, in his official capacity as Administrator; U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondents, CORTEVA AGRISCIENCE LLC, Respondent-Intervenor. 2
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2022-07-27 · Published · cited 0×
07/27/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 30, 2022 Session LUNA LAW GROUP, PLLC v. RICHARDSON M. ROBERTS Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 17-688-I Patricia Head Moskal, Chancellor ___________________________________
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2011-02-22 · Published · cited 54× · 15 A.3d 1247; 2011 Del. LEXIS 115; 2011 WL 592186
STEELE, Chief Justice: James E. Sheehan filed a personal injury action under 10 Del. C. § 8145, the Child Victim’s Act, against several institutional defendants, including the Oblates of St. Francis de Sales and Salesianum School, for the alleged sexual abuse he suffered in 1962 by Father Francis Norris, a teacher at Salesianum. The Child Victim’s Act (CVA), enacted in 2007, abolished the civil statute of limitati